如何在LFG中不区分论点和附言

Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Pub Date : 2016-12-16 DOI:10.21248/hpsg.2016.29

A. Przepiórkowski

{"title":"如何在LFG中不区分论点和附言","authors":"A. Przepiórkowski","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper briefly reexamines arguments for the argument–adjunct\ndichotomy, commonly assumed in contemporary linguistics, showing that\nthey do not stand up to scrutiny. It demonstrates that – perhaps\nsurprisingly – LFG currently only assumes this dichotomy in its\nf-structure feature geometry, and does not rely on it in any crucial\nway. Building on this observation, the paper presents a way of getting\nrid of this dichotomy altogether.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How not to distinguish arguments from adjuncts in LFG\",\"authors\":\"A. Przepiórkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2016.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe paper briefly reexamines arguments for the argument–adjunct\\ndichotomy, commonly assumed in contemporary linguistics, showing that\\nthey do not stand up to scrutiny. It demonstrates that – perhaps\\nsurprisingly – LFG currently only assumes this dichotomy in its\\nf-structure feature geometry, and does not rely on it in any crucial\\nway. Building on this observation, the paper presents a way of getting\\nrid of this dichotomy altogether.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 20

摘要

本文简要地重新审视了当代语言学中普遍假设的论证-辅助二分法的论点，表明它们经不起推敲。它表明——也许令人惊讶的是——LFG目前只在其自身结构特征几何中假设了这种二分法，并且在任何关键时刻都不依赖于它。基于这一观察，本文提出了一种完全摆脱这种二分法的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How not to distinguish arguments from adjuncts in LFG

The paper briefly reexamines arguments for the argument–adjunct dichotomy, commonly assumed in contemporary linguistics, showing that they do not stand up to scrutiny. It demonstrates that – perhaps surprisingly – LFG currently only assumes this dichotomy in its f-structure feature geometry, and does not rely on it in any crucial way. Building on this observation, the paper presents a way of getting rid of this dichotomy altogether.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar

自引率

0.00%

发文量