学术机构知识共享实践的系统文献综述

Mariana Purba, Ermatita Ermatita, Abdiansah Abdiansah, Vina Ayumi, Handrie Noprisson, Anita Ratnasari
{"title":"学术机构知识共享实践的系统文献综述","authors":"Mariana Purba, Ermatita Ermatita, Abdiansah Abdiansah, Vina Ayumi, Handrie Noprisson, Anita Ratnasari","doi":"10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many knowledge-sharing activities take place in educational institutions, both formally and informally. If this activity is organized with good knowledge management, then this will support a faster knowledge sharing process to get quality and innovative ideas. This paper aims to obtain a summary of existing research, issues, and opportunities for further analysis on knowledge-sharing (KS) practices in academic institutions. The phases of the systematic literature review (SLR) method are described based on Kitchenham (2009) guideline. We found 21 articles, seven articles from IEEE, nine articles from Science Direct, and five articles from Springer. The collection of research data on knowledge sharing has been carried out in the United States, Australia, China, Cyprus, United Kingdom, Ghana, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordanian, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia, with the most research locations being Malaysia (14%) and Saudi Arabia (19%). We also attempted to identify the research topic trend of knowledge sharing research in academic institutions. We found two types of research trends of knowledge sharing research in university, including factor analysis and architecture development. Of the two categories of research trends, 76% discussed factor analysis, and 24% discussed architectural development. We also identified six methods in KS research including Partial Least Square Structure Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), questionnaire, data triangulation, focus groups discussion, observation and interview. Moreover, the most used method in related research is questionnaire, because it is a relatively inexpensive, fast and efficient way of collecting large amounts of information.","PeriodicalId":250460,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Literature Review of Knowledge Sharing Practices in Academic Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Purba, Ermatita Ermatita, Abdiansah Abdiansah, Vina Ayumi, Handrie Noprisson, Anita Ratnasari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many knowledge-sharing activities take place in educational institutions, both formally and informally. If this activity is organized with good knowledge management, then this will support a faster knowledge sharing process to get quality and innovative ideas. This paper aims to obtain a summary of existing research, issues, and opportunities for further analysis on knowledge-sharing (KS) practices in academic institutions. The phases of the systematic literature review (SLR) method are described based on Kitchenham (2009) guideline. We found 21 articles, seven articles from IEEE, nine articles from Science Direct, and five articles from Springer. The collection of research data on knowledge sharing has been carried out in the United States, Australia, China, Cyprus, United Kingdom, Ghana, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordanian, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia, with the most research locations being Malaysia (14%) and Saudi Arabia (19%). We also attempted to identify the research topic trend of knowledge sharing research in academic institutions. We found two types of research trends of knowledge sharing research in university, including factor analysis and architecture development. Of the two categories of research trends, 76% discussed factor analysis, and 24% discussed architectural development. We also identified six methods in KS research including Partial Least Square Structure Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), questionnaire, data triangulation, focus groups discussion, observation and interview. Moreover, the most used method in related research is questionnaire, because it is a relatively inexpensive, fast and efficient way of collecting large amounts of information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS53775.2021.9699350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多知识分享活动在教育机构中进行,有正式的,也有非正式的。如果这个活动是在良好的知识管理下组织起来的,那么这将支持一个更快的知识共享过程,以获得高质量和创新的想法。本文旨在总结现有的研究,问题和机会,以进一步分析学术机构的知识共享(KS)实践。基于Kitchenham(2009)的指南,描述了系统文献综述(SLR)方法的各个阶段。我们找到了21篇文章,其中7篇来自IEEE, 9篇来自Science Direct, 5篇来自Springer。在美国、澳大利亚、中国、塞浦路斯、英国、加纳、匈牙利、印度尼西亚、伊朗、以色列、意大利、约旦、马来西亚和沙特阿拉伯进行了关于知识共享的研究数据收集,其中研究地点最多的是马来西亚(14%)和沙特阿拉伯(19%)。我们还试图识别学术机构知识共享研究的研究主题趋势。我们发现了大学知识共享研究的两种研究趋势:因子分析和架构开发。在两类研究趋势中,76%讨论了因素分析,24%讨论了架构开发。我们还确定了六种研究KS的方法,包括偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)、问卷调查、数据三角测量、焦点小组讨论、观察和访谈。此外,在相关研究中使用最多的方法是问卷调查,因为它是一种相对便宜,快速和有效的收集大量信息的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Literature Review of Knowledge Sharing Practices in Academic Institutions
Many knowledge-sharing activities take place in educational institutions, both formally and informally. If this activity is organized with good knowledge management, then this will support a faster knowledge sharing process to get quality and innovative ideas. This paper aims to obtain a summary of existing research, issues, and opportunities for further analysis on knowledge-sharing (KS) practices in academic institutions. The phases of the systematic literature review (SLR) method are described based on Kitchenham (2009) guideline. We found 21 articles, seven articles from IEEE, nine articles from Science Direct, and five articles from Springer. The collection of research data on knowledge sharing has been carried out in the United States, Australia, China, Cyprus, United Kingdom, Ghana, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordanian, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia, with the most research locations being Malaysia (14%) and Saudi Arabia (19%). We also attempted to identify the research topic trend of knowledge sharing research in academic institutions. We found two types of research trends of knowledge sharing research in university, including factor analysis and architecture development. Of the two categories of research trends, 76% discussed factor analysis, and 24% discussed architectural development. We also identified six methods in KS research including Partial Least Square Structure Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), questionnaire, data triangulation, focus groups discussion, observation and interview. Moreover, the most used method in related research is questionnaire, because it is a relatively inexpensive, fast and efficient way of collecting large amounts of information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信