基于fNIRS-EEG混合的5级记忆负荷判别

C. Herff, Ole Fortmann, C. Tse, Xiaoqin Cheng, F. Putze, D. Heger, Tanja Schultz
{"title":"基于fNIRS-EEG混合的5级记忆负荷判别","authors":"C. Herff, Ole Fortmann, C. Tse, Xiaoqin Cheng, F. Putze, D. Heger, Tanja Schultz","doi":"10.1109/NER.2015.7146546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we show that both electroencephalograhy (EEG) and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) can be used to discriminate between 5 levels of memory load. We induce memory load with the memory updating task, which is known to robustly generate memory load and allows us to define 5 different levels of load. Typical experiments only discriminate between low and high workload or up to a maximum of three classes. To the best of our knowledge, the memory updating task has not been used in combination with brain activity measurements before. Here, accuracies of up to 93% are achieved for the binary classification between very high and very low workload. On average, two levels of workload could be discriminated with 74% accuracy. Classification between the full five classes yielded 44% accuracy on average. Despite the fact that EEG results consistently outperformed the results obtained with fNIRS, we could show that the feature-level fusion of both modalities increased robustness of classification results. A reliable discrimination between different levels of memory load could be used to adapt user interfaces or present the right amount of information to a learner.","PeriodicalId":137451,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid fNIRS-EEG based discrimination of 5 levels of memory load\",\"authors\":\"C. Herff, Ole Fortmann, C. Tse, Xiaoqin Cheng, F. Putze, D. Heger, Tanja Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NER.2015.7146546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we show that both electroencephalograhy (EEG) and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) can be used to discriminate between 5 levels of memory load. We induce memory load with the memory updating task, which is known to robustly generate memory load and allows us to define 5 different levels of load. Typical experiments only discriminate between low and high workload or up to a maximum of three classes. To the best of our knowledge, the memory updating task has not been used in combination with brain activity measurements before. Here, accuracies of up to 93% are achieved for the binary classification between very high and very low workload. On average, two levels of workload could be discriminated with 74% accuracy. Classification between the full five classes yielded 44% accuracy on average. Despite the fact that EEG results consistently outperformed the results obtained with fNIRS, we could show that the feature-level fusion of both modalities increased robustness of classification results. A reliable discrimination between different levels of memory load could be used to adapt user interfaces or present the right amount of information to a learner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2015.7146546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2015.7146546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在这项研究中,我们发现脑电图(EEG)和功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)可以用来区分5个水平的记忆负荷。我们用内存更新任务诱导内存负载,这是已知的健壮地产生内存负载,并允许我们定义5个不同级别的负载。典型的实验只区分低负荷和高负荷或最多三个班。据我们所知,记忆更新任务之前还没有与大脑活动测量结合使用过。在这里,对于非常高和非常低的工作负载之间的二元分类,准确率高达93%。平均而言,区分两个级别的工作负载的准确率为74%。五个类别之间的分类平均准确率为44%。尽管EEG结果始终优于fNIRS结果,但我们可以证明,两种模式的特征级融合增加了分类结果的鲁棒性。对不同记忆负荷水平的可靠区分可以用来调整用户界面或向学习者呈现适当数量的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid fNIRS-EEG based discrimination of 5 levels of memory load
In this study, we show that both electroencephalograhy (EEG) and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) can be used to discriminate between 5 levels of memory load. We induce memory load with the memory updating task, which is known to robustly generate memory load and allows us to define 5 different levels of load. Typical experiments only discriminate between low and high workload or up to a maximum of three classes. To the best of our knowledge, the memory updating task has not been used in combination with brain activity measurements before. Here, accuracies of up to 93% are achieved for the binary classification between very high and very low workload. On average, two levels of workload could be discriminated with 74% accuracy. Classification between the full five classes yielded 44% accuracy on average. Despite the fact that EEG results consistently outperformed the results obtained with fNIRS, we could show that the feature-level fusion of both modalities increased robustness of classification results. A reliable discrimination between different levels of memory load could be used to adapt user interfaces or present the right amount of information to a learner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信