基于投影方法的激光雷达点云处理:比较

Guidong Yang, S. Mentasti, M. Bersani, Yafei Wang, F. Braghin, F. Cheli
{"title":"基于投影方法的激光雷达点云处理:比较","authors":"Guidong Yang, S. Mentasti, M. Bersani, Yafei Wang, F. Braghin, F. Cheli","doi":"10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accurate and rapid-response perception system is fundamental for autonomous vehicles to operate safely. 3D object detection methods handle point clouds given by LiDAR sensors to provide accurate depth and position information for each detection, together with its dimensions and classification. The information is then used to track vehicles and other obstacles in the surroundings of the autonomous vehicle, and also to feed control units that guarantee collision avoidance and motion planning. Nowadays, object detection systems can be divided into two main categories. The first ones are the geometric based, which retrieve the obstacles using geometric and morphological operations on the 3D points. The seconds are the deep learning-based, which process the 3D points, or an elaboration of the 3D point-cloud, with deep learning techniques to retrieve a set of obstacles. This paper presents a comparison between those two approaches, presenting one implementation of each class on a real autonomous vehicle. Accuracy of the estimates of the algorithms has been evaluated with experimental tests carried in the Monza ENI circuit. The positions of the ego vehicle and the obstacle are given by GPS sensors with real time kinematic (RTK) correction, which guarantees an accurate ground truth for the comparison. Both algorithms have been implemented on ROS and run on a consumer laptop.","PeriodicalId":104806,"journal":{"name":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LiDAR point-cloud processing based on projection methods: a comparison\",\"authors\":\"Guidong Yang, S. Mentasti, M. Bersani, Yafei Wang, F. Braghin, F. Cheli\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An accurate and rapid-response perception system is fundamental for autonomous vehicles to operate safely. 3D object detection methods handle point clouds given by LiDAR sensors to provide accurate depth and position information for each detection, together with its dimensions and classification. The information is then used to track vehicles and other obstacles in the surroundings of the autonomous vehicle, and also to feed control units that guarantee collision avoidance and motion planning. Nowadays, object detection systems can be divided into two main categories. The first ones are the geometric based, which retrieve the obstacles using geometric and morphological operations on the 3D points. The seconds are the deep learning-based, which process the 3D points, or an elaboration of the 3D point-cloud, with deep learning techniques to retrieve a set of obstacles. This paper presents a comparison between those two approaches, presenting one implementation of each class on a real autonomous vehicle. Accuracy of the estimates of the algorithms has been evaluated with experimental tests carried in the Monza ENI circuit. The positions of the ego vehicle and the obstacle are given by GPS sensors with real time kinematic (RTK) correction, which guarantees an accurate ground truth for the comparison. Both algorithms have been implemented on ROS and run on a consumer laptop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

准确、快速的感知系统是自动驾驶汽车安全运行的基础。三维目标检测方法处理激光雷达传感器给出的点云,为每次检测提供准确的深度和位置信息,以及其尺寸和分类。然后,这些信息被用于跟踪自动驾驶汽车周围的车辆和其他障碍物,并为保证避免碰撞和运动规划的控制单元提供信息。目前,目标检测系统可以分为两大类。第一类是基于几何的方法,利用三维点上的几何和形态运算来检索障碍物。秒是基于深度学习的,它处理3D点,或3D点云的细化,用深度学习技术检索一组障碍。本文对这两种方法进行了比较,并在一辆真实的自动驾驶汽车上展示了每种方法的一个实现。通过在蒙扎ENI电路中进行的实验测试,对算法估计的准确性进行了评估。小车和障碍物的位置由GPS传感器给出,并进行实时运动学(RTK)校正,为比较提供了准确的地面真实值。这两种算法都在ROS上实现,并在消费者笔记本电脑上运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LiDAR point-cloud processing based on projection methods: a comparison
An accurate and rapid-response perception system is fundamental for autonomous vehicles to operate safely. 3D object detection methods handle point clouds given by LiDAR sensors to provide accurate depth and position information for each detection, together with its dimensions and classification. The information is then used to track vehicles and other obstacles in the surroundings of the autonomous vehicle, and also to feed control units that guarantee collision avoidance and motion planning. Nowadays, object detection systems can be divided into two main categories. The first ones are the geometric based, which retrieve the obstacles using geometric and morphological operations on the 3D points. The seconds are the deep learning-based, which process the 3D points, or an elaboration of the 3D point-cloud, with deep learning techniques to retrieve a set of obstacles. This paper presents a comparison between those two approaches, presenting one implementation of each class on a real autonomous vehicle. Accuracy of the estimates of the algorithms has been evaluated with experimental tests carried in the Monza ENI circuit. The positions of the ego vehicle and the obstacle are given by GPS sensors with real time kinematic (RTK) correction, which guarantees an accurate ground truth for the comparison. Both algorithms have been implemented on ROS and run on a consumer laptop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信