不同传输速度模式下全球海气CO2通量的比较

N. Suzuki, M. Donelan, N. Takagaki, S. Komori
{"title":"不同传输速度模式下全球海气CO2通量的比较","authors":"N. Suzuki, M. Donelan, N. Takagaki, S. Komori","doi":"10.14928/AMSTEC.21.2_59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity is generally expressed as a function only of the wind speed U10. However, there exists considerable disagreement among the observed values. The disagreement is especially large in the context of the different sea surface conditions (wind wave growth and swell etc.). Consequently, many models of the air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity are proposed by field and laboratory experiments. In this study, we evaluate the estimated global air-sea CO2 gas flux using the different some air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity models (field experiment model, laboratory experiment model and hybrid model considering wave breaking). The 6-hourly wind speed and mean period of wind and wave data sets by ECMWF were used. The maximum difference of annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux was 0.76 PgC/year. The annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux of each laboratory experiment models were the smallest value, and each hybrid models were near value to each field experiment models. The difference of each model in low latitude is large, same as the difference in middle latitude. This shows that the difference of the result of each model in low latitude is significant for the estimation of air-sea CO2 gas flux.","PeriodicalId":400958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Marine Science and Technology Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the global air-sea CO2 gas flux on the difference of transfer velocity model\",\"authors\":\"N. Suzuki, M. Donelan, N. Takagaki, S. Komori\",\"doi\":\"10.14928/AMSTEC.21.2_59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity is generally expressed as a function only of the wind speed U10. However, there exists considerable disagreement among the observed values. The disagreement is especially large in the context of the different sea surface conditions (wind wave growth and swell etc.). Consequently, many models of the air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity are proposed by field and laboratory experiments. In this study, we evaluate the estimated global air-sea CO2 gas flux using the different some air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity models (field experiment model, laboratory experiment model and hybrid model considering wave breaking). The 6-hourly wind speed and mean period of wind and wave data sets by ECMWF were used. The maximum difference of annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux was 0.76 PgC/year. The annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux of each laboratory experiment models were the smallest value, and each hybrid models were near value to each field experiment models. The difference of each model in low latitude is large, same as the difference in middle latitude. This shows that the difference of the result of each model in low latitude is significant for the estimation of air-sea CO2 gas flux.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Marine Science and Technology Society\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Marine Science and Technology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14928/AMSTEC.21.2_59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Marine Science and Technology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14928/AMSTEC.21.2_59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

海气CO2气体传递速度一般仅表示为风速U10的函数。然而,观测值之间存在相当大的分歧。在不同海面条件(风浪增长和涌浪等)的背景下,分歧尤其大。因此,通过现场和室内实验,提出了许多海气CO2气体传输速度模型。本文采用不同的海气CO2气体传输速度模型(现场实验模型、室内实验模型和考虑波浪破碎的混合模型)对全球海气CO2气体通量进行了估算。采用ECMWF的6小时风速和平均风浪周期数据集。年全球海气CO2通量最大差值为0.76 PgC/年。各室内试验模型的年全球海气CO2通量最小,各混合模型与各野外试验模型接近。各模式在低纬度的差异较大,在中纬度的差异也较大。这说明各模式在低纬度地区对海气CO2气体通量的估算结果差异较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the global air-sea CO2 gas flux on the difference of transfer velocity model
The air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity is generally expressed as a function only of the wind speed U10. However, there exists considerable disagreement among the observed values. The disagreement is especially large in the context of the different sea surface conditions (wind wave growth and swell etc.). Consequently, many models of the air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity are proposed by field and laboratory experiments. In this study, we evaluate the estimated global air-sea CO2 gas flux using the different some air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity models (field experiment model, laboratory experiment model and hybrid model considering wave breaking). The 6-hourly wind speed and mean period of wind and wave data sets by ECMWF were used. The maximum difference of annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux was 0.76 PgC/year. The annual global air-sea CO2 gas flux of each laboratory experiment models were the smallest value, and each hybrid models were near value to each field experiment models. The difference of each model in low latitude is large, same as the difference in middle latitude. This shows that the difference of the result of each model in low latitude is significant for the estimation of air-sea CO2 gas flux.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信