建构主义教学有什么问题?理论和历史争议的阐述、概括和综合

Tomislav Topolovčan
{"title":"建构主义教学有什么问题?理论和历史争议的阐述、概括和综合","authors":"Tomislav Topolovčan","doi":"10.38003/sv.72.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to use a historical and theoretical-comparative methodological approach to elaborate and recapitulate the phenomenon, history, theoretical, methodological and didactic characteristics as well as certain controversies of constructivism in education. The emphasis will be placed on observing the constructivist teaching in the discourse of the movements of reform pedagogy from a hundred and more years ago. By synthesizing the analysed facts, one can state with certainty that constructivist teaching is a multiple and robust theoretical concept with its own definitions and a long history. The didactic arrangements of constructivist teaching show roots in the concepts of schools and teaching of the reform pedagogy movement, but these two terms cannot be considered synonymous. Constructivist teaching provides essential educational benefits to students, but there are also well-argued criticisms and limitations whose interpretations depend on the theoretical, epistemological and cultural perspectives of observation.","PeriodicalId":138779,"journal":{"name":"Školski vjesnik","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is wrong with constructivist teaching? Elaboration, recapitulation and synthesis of theoretical and historical controversies\",\"authors\":\"Tomislav Topolovčan\",\"doi\":\"10.38003/sv.72.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is to use a historical and theoretical-comparative methodological approach to elaborate and recapitulate the phenomenon, history, theoretical, methodological and didactic characteristics as well as certain controversies of constructivism in education. The emphasis will be placed on observing the constructivist teaching in the discourse of the movements of reform pedagogy from a hundred and more years ago. By synthesizing the analysed facts, one can state with certainty that constructivist teaching is a multiple and robust theoretical concept with its own definitions and a long history. The didactic arrangements of constructivist teaching show roots in the concepts of schools and teaching of the reform pedagogy movement, but these two terms cannot be considered synonymous. Constructivist teaching provides essential educational benefits to students, but there are also well-argued criticisms and limitations whose interpretations depend on the theoretical, epistemological and cultural perspectives of observation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Školski vjesnik\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Školski vjesnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38003/sv.72.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Školski vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38003/sv.72.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是运用历史和理论-比较方法论的方法来阐述和概括建构主义在教育中的现象、历史、理论、方法和教学特点以及某些争议。重点将放在观察一百多年前改革教育学运动话语中的建构主义教学。综合所分析的事实,我们可以肯定地说,建构主义教学是一个多元的、强大的理论概念,有自己的定义和悠久的历史。建构主义教学的教学安排根源于学校观念和改革教育学运动的教学,但这两个术语不能被认为是同义词。建构主义教学为学生提供了重要的教育效益,但也存在着充分论证的批评和限制,这些批评和限制的解释取决于观察的理论、认识论和文化观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is wrong with constructivist teaching? Elaboration, recapitulation and synthesis of theoretical and historical controversies
The aim of the study is to use a historical and theoretical-comparative methodological approach to elaborate and recapitulate the phenomenon, history, theoretical, methodological and didactic characteristics as well as certain controversies of constructivism in education. The emphasis will be placed on observing the constructivist teaching in the discourse of the movements of reform pedagogy from a hundred and more years ago. By synthesizing the analysed facts, one can state with certainty that constructivist teaching is a multiple and robust theoretical concept with its own definitions and a long history. The didactic arrangements of constructivist teaching show roots in the concepts of schools and teaching of the reform pedagogy movement, but these two terms cannot be considered synonymous. Constructivist teaching provides essential educational benefits to students, but there are also well-argued criticisms and limitations whose interpretations depend on the theoretical, epistemological and cultural perspectives of observation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信