{"title":"能量最优精密晶圆台定位:最小时间最优等价","authors":"I. Ioslovich, Shai Moshenberg, P. Gutman","doi":"10.1109/ISIE.2015.7281450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The minimal time optimality and the minimal energy optimality are often considered as competing approaches in the trajectory planning for precision movement of the wafer stages in electronic industry. We present here the theoretical and simulation results showing that with appropriate choice of the constraints these approaches are equivalent in the sense that they produce the same trajectory. The optimal control solver DIDO has been used in this research.","PeriodicalId":377110,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the energy-optimal precise wafer stage positioning: Equivalence with minimal time optimality\",\"authors\":\"I. Ioslovich, Shai Moshenberg, P. Gutman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISIE.2015.7281450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The minimal time optimality and the minimal energy optimality are often considered as competing approaches in the trajectory planning for precision movement of the wafer stages in electronic industry. We present here the theoretical and simulation results showing that with appropriate choice of the constraints these approaches are equivalent in the sense that they produce the same trajectory. The optimal control solver DIDO has been used in this research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2015.7281450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2015.7281450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the energy-optimal precise wafer stage positioning: Equivalence with minimal time optimality
The minimal time optimality and the minimal energy optimality are often considered as competing approaches in the trajectory planning for precision movement of the wafer stages in electronic industry. We present here the theoretical and simulation results showing that with appropriate choice of the constraints these approaches are equivalent in the sense that they produce the same trajectory. The optimal control solver DIDO has been used in this research.