R. Gehres, R. Malik, R. Amos, J. Brown, S. Butt, A. Chan, C. Collins, B. Colwill, B. Davies, A. Gabor, N. Le, P. Lindo, K. Mello, E. Meyette, V. Nastasi, J. Patrick, A. Piper, D. Prakash, T. Rust, A. Santiago, T. Su, R. van Roijen, M. Rutten, D. Slisher, B. Tessier, J. Tetzloff, D. Wehella-gamage, R. Wise, Q. Yang, C. Yu, R. Divakaruni, G. Goth
{"title":"90nm双应力衬垫技术的大批量生产","authors":"R. Gehres, R. Malik, R. Amos, J. Brown, S. Butt, A. Chan, C. Collins, B. Colwill, B. Davies, A. Gabor, N. Le, P. Lindo, K. Mello, E. Meyette, V. Nastasi, J. Patrick, A. Piper, D. Prakash, T. Rust, A. Santiago, T. Su, R. van Roijen, M. Rutten, D. Slisher, B. Tessier, J. Tetzloff, D. Wehella-gamage, R. Wise, Q. Yang, C. Yu, R. Divakaruni, G. Goth","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to meet the demand for improved microprocessor performance is made difficult due to the simultaneous need not to increase power consumption. In order to meet these conflicting demands, IBM introduced a 90 nm dual stress liner CMOS technology to improve performance without increasing power consumption (Santiago et al., 2006). In IBM's 300 mm fab, this technology was introduced on multiple microprocessors, designed by different design groups with different architectures. These microprocessors, which were originally designed for a single liner technology, were optimized for systematic yield, power/performance; circuit limited yield (CLY), and random defect limited yield. The benefit of the dual stress liner technology is demonstrated in the power/performance characteristic of a dual core microprocessor and the successful technology ramp is demonstrated by yields of two microprocessors","PeriodicalId":407645,"journal":{"name":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Volume Manufacturing Ramp In 90nm Dual Stress Liner Technology\",\"authors\":\"R. Gehres, R. Malik, R. Amos, J. Brown, S. Butt, A. Chan, C. Collins, B. Colwill, B. Davies, A. Gabor, N. Le, P. Lindo, K. Mello, E. Meyette, V. Nastasi, J. Patrick, A. Piper, D. Prakash, T. Rust, A. Santiago, T. Su, R. van Roijen, M. Rutten, D. Slisher, B. Tessier, J. Tetzloff, D. Wehella-gamage, R. Wise, Q. Yang, C. Yu, R. Divakaruni, G. Goth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability to meet the demand for improved microprocessor performance is made difficult due to the simultaneous need not to increase power consumption. In order to meet these conflicting demands, IBM introduced a 90 nm dual stress liner CMOS technology to improve performance without increasing power consumption (Santiago et al., 2006). In IBM's 300 mm fab, this technology was introduced on multiple microprocessors, designed by different design groups with different architectures. These microprocessors, which were originally designed for a single liner technology, were optimized for systematic yield, power/performance; circuit limited yield (CLY), and random defect limited yield. The benefit of the dual stress liner technology is demonstrated in the power/performance characteristic of a dual core microprocessor and the successful technology ramp is demonstrated by yields of two microprocessors\",\"PeriodicalId\":407645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
由于同时不需要增加功耗,满足对改进微处理器性能的需求的能力变得困难。为了满足这些相互冲突的需求,IBM推出了90nm双应力线CMOS技术,以提高性能而不增加功耗(Santiago et al., 2006)。在IBM的300毫米晶圆厂中,该技术被引入到多个微处理器上,由不同的设计团队用不同的架构设计。这些微处理器最初是为单衬里技术设计的,经过了系统产量、功率/性能的优化;电路限产率(CLY)和随机缺陷限产率。双应力衬垫技术的优势体现在双核微处理器的功率/性能特征上,两个微处理器的产量证明了成功的技术斜坡
High Volume Manufacturing Ramp In 90nm Dual Stress Liner Technology
The ability to meet the demand for improved microprocessor performance is made difficult due to the simultaneous need not to increase power consumption. In order to meet these conflicting demands, IBM introduced a 90 nm dual stress liner CMOS technology to improve performance without increasing power consumption (Santiago et al., 2006). In IBM's 300 mm fab, this technology was introduced on multiple microprocessors, designed by different design groups with different architectures. These microprocessors, which were originally designed for a single liner technology, were optimized for systematic yield, power/performance; circuit limited yield (CLY), and random defect limited yield. The benefit of the dual stress liner technology is demonstrated in the power/performance characteristic of a dual core microprocessor and the successful technology ramp is demonstrated by yields of two microprocessors