美国史前大盆地偶蹄动物合作狩猎的人口与社会文化因素评价

Kari Sprengeler, Christopher Morgan
{"title":"美国史前大盆地偶蹄动物合作狩猎的人口与社会文化因素评价","authors":"Kari Sprengeler, Christopher Morgan","doi":"10.3828/hgr.2018.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis research evaluates the association of ethnographically derived demographic and sociocultural variables with a large sample of communal, landscapescale hunting features (drivelines, corrals and traps) from across the Great Basin; it does so in an attempt to identify the sociocultural contexts that may have encouraged or discouraged people to cooperate rather than compete or operate individually. Results indicate that communal hunting was associated with moderate population densities and with greater degrees of ritual and some forms of property ownership, but not with greater degrees of leadership or territoriality. The implications of this work are that high population densities and entrenched leadership positions are not necessarily required for large-scale cooperative efforts and that territoriality may have retarded cooperation at the scales required to elicit large-scale group effort, at least in regions with relatively low population densities. It also appears that ritual may have played a role in generating the coherence necessary for cooperation among oftentimes far-flung, autonomous families and that privatising communal hunting features was necessary to underwrite the technological investment entailed by making and using these features.","PeriodicalId":271872,"journal":{"name":"Hunter Gatherer Research: Volume 4, Issue 4","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of demographic and sociocultural factors affiliated with cooperative artiodactyl hunting in the prehistoric Great Basin, USA\",\"authors\":\"Kari Sprengeler, Christopher Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/hgr.2018.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis research evaluates the association of ethnographically derived demographic and sociocultural variables with a large sample of communal, landscapescale hunting features (drivelines, corrals and traps) from across the Great Basin; it does so in an attempt to identify the sociocultural contexts that may have encouraged or discouraged people to cooperate rather than compete or operate individually. Results indicate that communal hunting was associated with moderate population densities and with greater degrees of ritual and some forms of property ownership, but not with greater degrees of leadership or territoriality. The implications of this work are that high population densities and entrenched leadership positions are not necessarily required for large-scale cooperative efforts and that territoriality may have retarded cooperation at the scales required to elicit large-scale group effort, at least in regions with relatively low population densities. It also appears that ritual may have played a role in generating the coherence necessary for cooperation among oftentimes far-flung, autonomous families and that privatising communal hunting features was necessary to underwrite the technological investment entailed by making and using these features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hunter Gatherer Research: Volume 4, Issue 4\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hunter Gatherer Research: Volume 4, Issue 4\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2018.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hunter Gatherer Research: Volume 4, Issue 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2018.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了民族志衍生的人口和社会文化变量与大盆地各地公共景观狩猎特征(传动系统、畜栏和陷阱)的大样本之间的关系;它这样做是为了确定可能鼓励或阻碍人们合作而不是竞争或单独操作的社会文化背景。结果表明,群体狩猎与适度的人口密度、更高程度的仪式和某些形式的财产所有权有关,但与更高程度的领导或领土所有权无关。这项工作的含义是,高人口密度和根深蒂固的领导地位并不一定需要大规模的合作努力,领土可能阻碍了大规模的合作,至少在人口密度相对较低的地区。此外,仪式可能在产生相互协作所必需的一致性方面发挥了作用,这些一致性往往是在遥远的自治家庭之间产生的,而将公共狩猎特征私有化对于保证制作和使用这些特征所需要的技术投资是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of demographic and sociocultural factors affiliated with cooperative artiodactyl hunting in the prehistoric Great Basin, USA
This research evaluates the association of ethnographically derived demographic and sociocultural variables with a large sample of communal, landscapescale hunting features (drivelines, corrals and traps) from across the Great Basin; it does so in an attempt to identify the sociocultural contexts that may have encouraged or discouraged people to cooperate rather than compete or operate individually. Results indicate that communal hunting was associated with moderate population densities and with greater degrees of ritual and some forms of property ownership, but not with greater degrees of leadership or territoriality. The implications of this work are that high population densities and entrenched leadership positions are not necessarily required for large-scale cooperative efforts and that territoriality may have retarded cooperation at the scales required to elicit large-scale group effort, at least in regions with relatively low population densities. It also appears that ritual may have played a role in generating the coherence necessary for cooperation among oftentimes far-flung, autonomous families and that privatising communal hunting features was necessary to underwrite the technological investment entailed by making and using these features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信