不同抽象层次上顺序机的验证

S. Devadas, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, A. Newton
{"title":"不同抽象层次上顺序机的验证","authors":"S. Devadas, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, A. Newton","doi":"10.1145/37888.37929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, an algorithm is presented for the verification of the equivalence of two sequential circuit descriptions at the same or differing levels of abstraction, namely at the register-transfer (RT) level and the logic level. The descriptions represent general finite automata at the differing levels -- a finite automaton can be described in a ISP-like language and its equivalence to a logic level implementation can be verified using our algorithm. Two logic level automatons can be similarly verified for equivalence. Previous approaches to sequential circuit verification have been restricted to verifying relatively simple descriptions with small amounts of memory. Unlike these approaches, our technique is shown to be computationally efficient for much more complex circuits. The efficiency of our algorithm lies in the exploitation of don't care information derivable from the RTL or logic level description (e.g invalid input and output sequences) during the verification process. Using efficient cube enumeration procedures at the logic level we have been able to verify the equivalence of finite automata with a large number of states in small amounts of cpu-time.","PeriodicalId":301552,"journal":{"name":"24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On The Verification of Sequential Machines at Differing Levels of Abstraction\",\"authors\":\"S. Devadas, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, A. Newton\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/37888.37929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, an algorithm is presented for the verification of the equivalence of two sequential circuit descriptions at the same or differing levels of abstraction, namely at the register-transfer (RT) level and the logic level. The descriptions represent general finite automata at the differing levels -- a finite automaton can be described in a ISP-like language and its equivalence to a logic level implementation can be verified using our algorithm. Two logic level automatons can be similarly verified for equivalence. Previous approaches to sequential circuit verification have been restricted to verifying relatively simple descriptions with small amounts of memory. Unlike these approaches, our technique is shown to be computationally efficient for much more complex circuits. The efficiency of our algorithm lies in the exploitation of don't care information derivable from the RTL or logic level description (e.g invalid input and output sequences) during the verification process. Using efficient cube enumeration procedures at the logic level we have been able to verify the equivalence of finite automata with a large number of states in small amounts of cpu-time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"87\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/37888.37929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/37888.37929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

摘要

本文提出了一种算法,用于验证两个顺序电路描述在相同或不同抽象层次上的等价性,即在寄存器-传输(RT)层和逻辑层。这些描述代表了不同层次的一般有限自动机——有限自动机可以用类似isp的语言描述,并且可以使用我们的算法验证其与逻辑级实现的等价性。两个逻辑级自动机可以类似地验证是否等价。以前的顺序电路验证方法仅限于验证具有少量内存的相对简单的描述。与这些方法不同,我们的技术在更复杂的电路中显示出计算效率。我们的算法的效率在于在验证过程中利用了从RTL或逻辑层描述中派生的无关信息(例如无效的输入输出序列)。在逻辑级别使用高效的多维数据集枚举过程,我们已经能够在少量cpu时间内验证具有大量状态的有限自动机的等价性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On The Verification of Sequential Machines at Differing Levels of Abstraction
In this paper, an algorithm is presented for the verification of the equivalence of two sequential circuit descriptions at the same or differing levels of abstraction, namely at the register-transfer (RT) level and the logic level. The descriptions represent general finite automata at the differing levels -- a finite automaton can be described in a ISP-like language and its equivalence to a logic level implementation can be verified using our algorithm. Two logic level automatons can be similarly verified for equivalence. Previous approaches to sequential circuit verification have been restricted to verifying relatively simple descriptions with small amounts of memory. Unlike these approaches, our technique is shown to be computationally efficient for much more complex circuits. The efficiency of our algorithm lies in the exploitation of don't care information derivable from the RTL or logic level description (e.g invalid input and output sequences) during the verification process. Using efficient cube enumeration procedures at the logic level we have been able to verify the equivalence of finite automata with a large number of states in small amounts of cpu-time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信