{"title":"无知之幕背后的分配","authors":"Junichiro Wada","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2672305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To bring apportionment closer to quotas or the apportionment quotient closer to the population quotient, instead of using “distance,” we introduce f-divergence for utilitarianism and Bregman divergence for suitable optimization. Even in our relaxed condition, we find that we must use alpha-divergence for optimization and show that the minimization of alpha-divergence induces the same divisor methods that correspond to the Kolm-Atkinson social welfare function, which is bounded by constant relative risk aversion.","PeriodicalId":104715,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD: Economics & Political Science (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apportionment Behind the Veil of Ignorance\",\"authors\":\"Junichiro Wada\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2672305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To bring apportionment closer to quotas or the apportionment quotient closer to the population quotient, instead of using “distance,” we introduce f-divergence for utilitarianism and Bregman divergence for suitable optimization. Even in our relaxed condition, we find that we must use alpha-divergence for optimization and show that the minimization of alpha-divergence induces the same divisor methods that correspond to the Kolm-Atkinson social welfare function, which is bounded by constant relative risk aversion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INSEAD: Economics & Political Science (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INSEAD: Economics & Political Science (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD: Economics & Political Science (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To bring apportionment closer to quotas or the apportionment quotient closer to the population quotient, instead of using “distance,” we introduce f-divergence for utilitarianism and Bregman divergence for suitable optimization. Even in our relaxed condition, we find that we must use alpha-divergence for optimization and show that the minimization of alpha-divergence induces the same divisor methods that correspond to the Kolm-Atkinson social welfare function, which is bounded by constant relative risk aversion.