作为开放制度的间断时代家庭管理再配置

M. Sajeva, Andrew S. Mitchell, M. Lemon
{"title":"作为开放制度的间断时代家庭管理再配置","authors":"M. Sajeva, Andrew S. Mitchell, M. Lemon","doi":"10.4018/IJFBMBM.2019010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is based upon a heterodox approach to economics that rejects the oversimplification made by closed economic models and the mainstream concept of ‘externality.' This approach re-imagines economics as a holistic evaluation of resources versus human needs, which requires judgement based on understanding of the complexity generated by the dynamic relations between different systems. One re-imagining of the economic model is as a holistic and systemic evaluation of agri-food systems' sustainability that was performed through the multi-dimensional Governance Assessment Matrix Exercise (GAME). This is based on the five capitals model of sustainability, and the translation of qualitative evaluations into quantitative scores. This is based on the triangulation of big data from a variety of sources. To represent quantitative interactions, this article proposes a provisional translation of GAME's qualitative evaluation into a quantitative form through the identification of measurement units that can reflect the different capital dimensions. For instance, a post-normal, ecological accounting method, Emergy is proposed to evaluate the natural capital. The revised GAME re-imagines economics not as the ‘dismal science,' but as one that has potential leverage for positive, adaptive and sustainable ecosystemic analyses and global ‘household' management. This article proposes an explicit recognition of economics nested within the social spheres of human and social capital which are in turn nested within the ecological capital upon which all life rests and is truly the bottom line. In this article, the authors make reference to an on-line retailer of local food and drink to illustrate the methods for evaluation of the five capitals model.","PeriodicalId":137727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconfiguring Household Management in Times of Discontinuity as an Open System\",\"authors\":\"M. Sajeva, Andrew S. Mitchell, M. Lemon\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJFBMBM.2019010101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is based upon a heterodox approach to economics that rejects the oversimplification made by closed economic models and the mainstream concept of ‘externality.' This approach re-imagines economics as a holistic evaluation of resources versus human needs, which requires judgement based on understanding of the complexity generated by the dynamic relations between different systems. One re-imagining of the economic model is as a holistic and systemic evaluation of agri-food systems' sustainability that was performed through the multi-dimensional Governance Assessment Matrix Exercise (GAME). This is based on the five capitals model of sustainability, and the translation of qualitative evaluations into quantitative scores. This is based on the triangulation of big data from a variety of sources. To represent quantitative interactions, this article proposes a provisional translation of GAME's qualitative evaluation into a quantitative form through the identification of measurement units that can reflect the different capital dimensions. For instance, a post-normal, ecological accounting method, Emergy is proposed to evaluate the natural capital. The revised GAME re-imagines economics not as the ‘dismal science,' but as one that has potential leverage for positive, adaptive and sustainable ecosystemic analyses and global ‘household' management. This article proposes an explicit recognition of economics nested within the social spheres of human and social capital which are in turn nested within the ecological capital upon which all life rests and is truly the bottom line. In this article, the authors make reference to an on-line retailer of local food and drink to illustrate the methods for evaluation of the five capitals model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFBMBM.2019010101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFBMBM.2019010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文基于一种非正统的经济学方法,拒绝由封闭的经济模型和“外部性”的主流概念所造成的过度简化。这种方法将经济学重新想象为对资源与人类需求的整体评估,这需要基于对不同系统之间动态关系产生的复杂性的理解进行判断。经济模型的一个重新构想是通过多维治理评估矩阵练习(GAME)对农业粮食系统的可持续性进行全面和系统的评估。这是基于可持续性的五个资本模型,并将定性评估转化为定量评分。这是基于对各种来源的大数据进行三角测量。为了表现定量的相互作用,本文提出通过识别能够反映不同资本维度的计量单位,将GAME的定性评价临时转化为定量的形式。例如,提出了一种后常态的生态核算方法——能值(energy)来评价自然资本。修订后的GAME不再把经济学想象成一门“沉闷的科学”,而是一门对积极、适应性和可持续的生态系统分析和全球“家庭”管理具有潜在杠杆作用的科学。这篇文章提出了一个明确的认识,即经济学嵌套在人类和社会资本的社会领域中,而人类和社会资本又嵌套在所有生命赖以生存的生态资本中,这才是真正的底线。本文以某本地食品饮料在线零售商为例,阐述了五资本模型的评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconfiguring Household Management in Times of Discontinuity as an Open System
This article is based upon a heterodox approach to economics that rejects the oversimplification made by closed economic models and the mainstream concept of ‘externality.' This approach re-imagines economics as a holistic evaluation of resources versus human needs, which requires judgement based on understanding of the complexity generated by the dynamic relations between different systems. One re-imagining of the economic model is as a holistic and systemic evaluation of agri-food systems' sustainability that was performed through the multi-dimensional Governance Assessment Matrix Exercise (GAME). This is based on the five capitals model of sustainability, and the translation of qualitative evaluations into quantitative scores. This is based on the triangulation of big data from a variety of sources. To represent quantitative interactions, this article proposes a provisional translation of GAME's qualitative evaluation into a quantitative form through the identification of measurement units that can reflect the different capital dimensions. For instance, a post-normal, ecological accounting method, Emergy is proposed to evaluate the natural capital. The revised GAME re-imagines economics not as the ‘dismal science,' but as one that has potential leverage for positive, adaptive and sustainable ecosystemic analyses and global ‘household' management. This article proposes an explicit recognition of economics nested within the social spheres of human and social capital which are in turn nested within the ecological capital upon which all life rests and is truly the bottom line. In this article, the authors make reference to an on-line retailer of local food and drink to illustrate the methods for evaluation of the five capitals model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信