组织界面压力和11种不同减压支持面估计的皮下压力。

Decubitus Pub Date : 1992-03-01
J Y Thompson-Bishop, C M Mottola
{"title":"组织界面压力和11种不同减压支持面估计的皮下压力。","authors":"J Y Thompson-Bishop,&nbsp;C M Mottola","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study examined the pressure-reducing properties of 11 different pressure-reducing devices as compared to a standard hospital mattress. Mean trochanteric and heel pressure readings were obtained on each surface from 13 healthy adult volunteers by using an electropneumatic pressure transducer (Gaymar, catalog # PSM1). Mean trochanteric pressures ranged from 37.2 mm Hg to 55.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 83.6 mm Hg on a standard hospital mattress. Mean heel pressure readings ranged from 28.1 mm Hg to 62.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 93.9 mm Hg on the standard hospital mattress. While pressure-reducing support surfaces were found to yield significantly lower mean pressure readings than the standard hospital mattress, none of them is capable of preventing tissue ischemia if the subcutaneous pressure is three to five times higher than the interface pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":77095,"journal":{"name":"Decubitus","volume":"5 2","pages":"42-6, 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"J Y Thompson-Bishop,&nbsp;C M Mottola\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This pilot study examined the pressure-reducing properties of 11 different pressure-reducing devices as compared to a standard hospital mattress. Mean trochanteric and heel pressure readings were obtained on each surface from 13 healthy adult volunteers by using an electropneumatic pressure transducer (Gaymar, catalog # PSM1). Mean trochanteric pressures ranged from 37.2 mm Hg to 55.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 83.6 mm Hg on a standard hospital mattress. Mean heel pressure readings ranged from 28.1 mm Hg to 62.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 93.9 mm Hg on the standard hospital mattress. While pressure-reducing support surfaces were found to yield significantly lower mean pressure readings than the standard hospital mattress, none of them is capable of preventing tissue ischemia if the subcutaneous pressure is three to five times higher than the interface pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decubitus\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"42-6, 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decubitus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decubitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项试点研究检查了11种不同的减压装置的减压性能,并与标准医院床垫进行了比较。使用电-气动压力传感器(Gaymar,目录# PSM1)获得13名健康成年志愿者在每个表面上的平均粗隆和足跟压力读数。与标准医院床垫上的83.6毫米汞柱相比,减压支撑表面上的平均粗隆压力为37.2毫米汞柱至55.1毫米汞柱。与标准医院床垫的93.9毫米汞柱相比,减压支撑表面的平均跟压读数从28.1毫米汞柱到62.1毫米汞柱。虽然发现减压支撑表面的平均压力读数明显低于标准医院床垫,但如果皮下压力比界面压力高3到5倍,它们都不能防止组织缺血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.

This pilot study examined the pressure-reducing properties of 11 different pressure-reducing devices as compared to a standard hospital mattress. Mean trochanteric and heel pressure readings were obtained on each surface from 13 healthy adult volunteers by using an electropneumatic pressure transducer (Gaymar, catalog # PSM1). Mean trochanteric pressures ranged from 37.2 mm Hg to 55.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 83.6 mm Hg on a standard hospital mattress. Mean heel pressure readings ranged from 28.1 mm Hg to 62.1 mm Hg on the pressure-reducing support surfaces as compared to 93.9 mm Hg on the standard hospital mattress. While pressure-reducing support surfaces were found to yield significantly lower mean pressure readings than the standard hospital mattress, none of them is capable of preventing tissue ischemia if the subcutaneous pressure is three to five times higher than the interface pressure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信