A. Dollas, E. Sotiriades, Apostolos Emmanouelides, Lee House
{"title":"通用FCCM与定制FCCM: Splash2、Quickturn RPM和GE1用于Golomb标尺派生的比较","authors":"A. Dollas, E. Sotiriades, Apostolos Emmanouelides, Lee House","doi":"10.1109/FPGA.1998.707911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An algorithm for the derivation of Golomb rulers has been mapped on the Quickturn RPM, the Splash 2, and a newly developed FCCM, named GEI. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the three cases are quantified and analyzed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":309841,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines (Cat. No.98TB100251)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General purpose vs. custom FCCM's: a comparison of Splash2, Quickturn RPM, and GE1 for Golomb ruler derivation\",\"authors\":\"A. Dollas, E. Sotiriades, Apostolos Emmanouelides, Lee House\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FPGA.1998.707911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An algorithm for the derivation of Golomb rulers has been mapped on the Quickturn RPM, the Splash 2, and a newly developed FCCM, named GEI. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the three cases are quantified and analyzed in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines (Cat. No.98TB100251)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines (Cat. No.98TB100251)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FPGA.1998.707911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines (Cat. No.98TB100251)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FPGA.1998.707911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
General purpose vs. custom FCCM's: a comparison of Splash2, Quickturn RPM, and GE1 for Golomb ruler derivation
An algorithm for the derivation of Golomb rulers has been mapped on the Quickturn RPM, the Splash 2, and a newly developed FCCM, named GEI. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the three cases are quantified and analyzed in this paper.