有剂量的视频短片干预是否更有效,效果更持久?一项金融素养研究。

S. M. M. Prado, P. Everaert, M. Valcke
{"title":"有剂量的视频短片干预是否更有效,效果更持久?一项金融素养研究。","authors":"S. M. M. Prado, P. Everaert, M. Valcke","doi":"10.1145/3436756.3437055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis comparing short and long periods of video vignettes intervention and a follow-up evaluation has been applied to measure the compared impact and the durability of this kind of visual tools in the financial literacy (FL) levels of the participants. The participants have been involved in a story reacting with the question-answer related to the house, car, and pension plan choosing as the key financial decisions (KFD). The four video vignettes build on video animated response-based simulations, in a case format, contain 20 questions about knowledge, self-efficacy, and confidence dimensions; all of them, as a feedback system to measure Its impact on a randomized sample of university students. Their FL score ex-ante vs. ex-post with a tested FL scale was analyzed to conclude the FL effect is higher and positive in the four-weeks session (long intervention) vs. one-week course (short intervention). The same trend was observed within the follow-up evaluation applied six months after the durability confirmed. A parametric and non-parametric test confirms these results. The findings and its effects on public policy and the Implications for future research must be discussed.","PeriodicalId":250546,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the dosed video-vignettes intervention more effective with a longer-lasting effect? A financial literacy Study.\",\"authors\":\"S. M. M. Prado, P. Everaert, M. Valcke\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3436756.3437055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An analysis comparing short and long periods of video vignettes intervention and a follow-up evaluation has been applied to measure the compared impact and the durability of this kind of visual tools in the financial literacy (FL) levels of the participants. The participants have been involved in a story reacting with the question-answer related to the house, car, and pension plan choosing as the key financial decisions (KFD). The four video vignettes build on video animated response-based simulations, in a case format, contain 20 questions about knowledge, self-efficacy, and confidence dimensions; all of them, as a feedback system to measure Its impact on a randomized sample of university students. Their FL score ex-ante vs. ex-post with a tested FL scale was analyzed to conclude the FL effect is higher and positive in the four-weeks session (long intervention) vs. one-week course (short intervention). The same trend was observed within the follow-up evaluation applied six months after the durability confirmed. A parametric and non-parametric test confirms these results. The findings and its effects on public policy and the Implications for future research must be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文采用了一种分析方法,比较了短时间和长时间的视频短片干预和后续评估,以衡量这种视觉工具对参与者金融素养(FL)水平的比较影响和持久性。参与者参与了一个故事,回答与房屋,汽车和养老金计划选择有关的问题,作为关键的财务决策(KFD)。这四个视频短片以案例形式建立在视频动画响应模拟的基础上,包含20个关于知识、自我效能和信心维度的问题;作为一个反馈系统来衡量其对随机抽样的大学生的影响。用测试过的FL量表对他们的前后FL评分进行分析,得出4周(长干预)比1周(短干预)的FL效果更高、更积极的结论。在耐久性确认后6个月的后续评估中也观察到同样的趋势。参数和非参数测试证实了这些结果。必须讨论这些发现及其对公共政策的影响以及对未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the dosed video-vignettes intervention more effective with a longer-lasting effect? A financial literacy Study.
An analysis comparing short and long periods of video vignettes intervention and a follow-up evaluation has been applied to measure the compared impact and the durability of this kind of visual tools in the financial literacy (FL) levels of the participants. The participants have been involved in a story reacting with the question-answer related to the house, car, and pension plan choosing as the key financial decisions (KFD). The four video vignettes build on video animated response-based simulations, in a case format, contain 20 questions about knowledge, self-efficacy, and confidence dimensions; all of them, as a feedback system to measure Its impact on a randomized sample of university students. Their FL score ex-ante vs. ex-post with a tested FL scale was analyzed to conclude the FL effect is higher and positive in the four-weeks session (long intervention) vs. one-week course (short intervention). The same trend was observed within the follow-up evaluation applied six months after the durability confirmed. A parametric and non-parametric test confirms these results. The findings and its effects on public policy and the Implications for future research must be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信