{"title":"基于自适应boosting和人工神经网络的工程造价预测","authors":"Wenhui Feng, Yafeng Zou","doi":"10.1680/jsmic.22.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The artificial bee colony algorithm and multilayer error back propagation neural networks commonly used in construction project cost forecasting suffer from slow training speed and high cost. A combination of the beetle antennae search, support vector machine, adaptive boosting and genetic algorithms was proposed to solve these problems. Support vector machine optimisation was accomplished using the beetle antennae search algorithm. The enhanced genetic algorithm was then used directly to swap out the fit solutions for the unfit ones. One hundred projects completed during the last three years were chosen from a network integration database to serve as the training data set after developing the prediction model. Using actual cost information and trial and error, appropriate parameters were chosen and combinations of algorithms were selected for comparison. The maximum relative error of the improved method was 9.01%, which was 34.68% lower than the baseline method, while the smallest relative error was 0.59%, which was 1.58% lower than the baseline method. The study’s innovation lay in the addition of the beetle antennae search algorithm and enhancement of the genetic algorithm. The former significantly increased the network’s search efficiency, while the latter increased population fitness generally and mitigated the drawback of the genetic algorithm, which was prone to local convergence.","PeriodicalId":371248,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction cost prediction based on adaptive boosting and artificial neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Wenhui Feng, Yafeng Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jsmic.22.00027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The artificial bee colony algorithm and multilayer error back propagation neural networks commonly used in construction project cost forecasting suffer from slow training speed and high cost. A combination of the beetle antennae search, support vector machine, adaptive boosting and genetic algorithms was proposed to solve these problems. Support vector machine optimisation was accomplished using the beetle antennae search algorithm. The enhanced genetic algorithm was then used directly to swap out the fit solutions for the unfit ones. One hundred projects completed during the last three years were chosen from a network integration database to serve as the training data set after developing the prediction model. Using actual cost information and trial and error, appropriate parameters were chosen and combinations of algorithms were selected for comparison. The maximum relative error of the improved method was 9.01%, which was 34.68% lower than the baseline method, while the smallest relative error was 0.59%, which was 1.58% lower than the baseline method. The study’s innovation lay in the addition of the beetle antennae search algorithm and enhancement of the genetic algorithm. The former significantly increased the network’s search efficiency, while the latter increased population fitness generally and mitigated the drawback of the genetic algorithm, which was prone to local convergence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.22.00027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.22.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction cost prediction based on adaptive boosting and artificial neural networks
The artificial bee colony algorithm and multilayer error back propagation neural networks commonly used in construction project cost forecasting suffer from slow training speed and high cost. A combination of the beetle antennae search, support vector machine, adaptive boosting and genetic algorithms was proposed to solve these problems. Support vector machine optimisation was accomplished using the beetle antennae search algorithm. The enhanced genetic algorithm was then used directly to swap out the fit solutions for the unfit ones. One hundred projects completed during the last three years were chosen from a network integration database to serve as the training data set after developing the prediction model. Using actual cost information and trial and error, appropriate parameters were chosen and combinations of algorithms were selected for comparison. The maximum relative error of the improved method was 9.01%, which was 34.68% lower than the baseline method, while the smallest relative error was 0.59%, which was 1.58% lower than the baseline method. The study’s innovation lay in the addition of the beetle antennae search algorithm and enhancement of the genetic algorithm. The former significantly increased the network’s search efficiency, while the latter increased population fitness generally and mitigated the drawback of the genetic algorithm, which was prone to local convergence.