认知不公:南非高等教育机构之间衔接管理的障碍

D. Lortan, S. Maistry
{"title":"认知不公:南非高等教育机构之间衔接管理的障碍","authors":"D. Lortan, S. Maistry","doi":"10.26803/myres.2018.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The call for free education and decolonization of higher education curricula in recent years by university students in South Africa has increased awareness of epistemological issues and the notion of epistemic justice in higher education. In national policies education is presented as a critical means for addressing inequality, poverty and unemployment and the need for integration of the various strands of the post-school education and training system is highlighted. Systemic articulation between institutions of learning and work is viewed as expanding access to education and training opportunities.A national articulation baseline survey involving all public universities and technical vocational education and training (TVET) colleges was undertaken in November 2016 in order to explore the existence and nature of articulation initiatives, and identify enablers and barriers to articulation between higher education institutions in South Africa. The report was completed in October 2017. This paper focuses on findings in the report related to articulation management between TVET colleges and universities. Although not explicitly stated, the findings revealed the prevalence of what we refer to as epistemic injustice, indicated by the extent to which individual and collective attitudes in academia perpetuate discrimination that impacts negatively on students’ progression from one institution to another higher learning institution. The need for epistemic justice to be included in the articulation lexicon on a national level is highlighted. One of the recommendations made in the report is that the South African Qualifications Authority should raise the level of awareness of epistemic injustice at institutional and individual levels.","PeriodicalId":269540,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic Injustice: Barrier to Articulation Management between Higher Education Institutions in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"D. Lortan, S. Maistry\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/myres.2018.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The call for free education and decolonization of higher education curricula in recent years by university students in South Africa has increased awareness of epistemological issues and the notion of epistemic justice in higher education. In national policies education is presented as a critical means for addressing inequality, poverty and unemployment and the need for integration of the various strands of the post-school education and training system is highlighted. Systemic articulation between institutions of learning and work is viewed as expanding access to education and training opportunities.A national articulation baseline survey involving all public universities and technical vocational education and training (TVET) colleges was undertaken in November 2016 in order to explore the existence and nature of articulation initiatives, and identify enablers and barriers to articulation between higher education institutions in South Africa. The report was completed in October 2017. This paper focuses on findings in the report related to articulation management between TVET colleges and universities. Although not explicitly stated, the findings revealed the prevalence of what we refer to as epistemic injustice, indicated by the extent to which individual and collective attitudes in academia perpetuate discrimination that impacts negatively on students’ progression from one institution to another higher learning institution. The need for epistemic justice to be included in the articulation lexicon on a national level is highlighted. One of the recommendations made in the report is that the South African Qualifications Authority should raise the level of awareness of epistemic injustice at institutional and individual levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/myres.2018.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/myres.2018.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,南非大学生呼吁免费教育和高等教育课程的非殖民化,提高了对高等教育中认识论问题和认识论正义概念的认识。在国家政策中,教育被认为是解决不平等、贫穷和失业问题的关键手段,并强调需要将学校后教育和培训制度的各个部分结合起来。学习机构和工作机构之间的系统衔接被视为扩大获得教育和培训机会的途径。2016年11月进行了一项涉及所有公立大学和职业技术教育与培训学院的全国衔接基线调查,以探索衔接倡议的存在和性质,并确定南非高等教育机构之间衔接的推动因素和障碍。该报告于2017年10月完成。本文着重分析了报告中有关高职院校衔接管理的研究结果。虽然没有明确说明,但研究结果揭示了我们所说的认知不公正的普遍存在,表明了学术界个人和集体态度使歧视持续存在的程度,这种歧视对学生从一个机构到另一个高等学府的进步产生了负面影响。需要认识正义,包括在发音词典在国家层面上强调。报告中提出的一项建议是,南非资格管理局应在机构和个人层面提高对知识不公正的认识水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic Injustice: Barrier to Articulation Management between Higher Education Institutions in South Africa
The call for free education and decolonization of higher education curricula in recent years by university students in South Africa has increased awareness of epistemological issues and the notion of epistemic justice in higher education. In national policies education is presented as a critical means for addressing inequality, poverty and unemployment and the need for integration of the various strands of the post-school education and training system is highlighted. Systemic articulation between institutions of learning and work is viewed as expanding access to education and training opportunities.A national articulation baseline survey involving all public universities and technical vocational education and training (TVET) colleges was undertaken in November 2016 in order to explore the existence and nature of articulation initiatives, and identify enablers and barriers to articulation between higher education institutions in South Africa. The report was completed in October 2017. This paper focuses on findings in the report related to articulation management between TVET colleges and universities. Although not explicitly stated, the findings revealed the prevalence of what we refer to as epistemic injustice, indicated by the extent to which individual and collective attitudes in academia perpetuate discrimination that impacts negatively on students’ progression from one institution to another higher learning institution. The need for epistemic justice to be included in the articulation lexicon on a national level is highlighted. One of the recommendations made in the report is that the South African Qualifications Authority should raise the level of awareness of epistemic injustice at institutional and individual levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信