基于场景的可靠性单元测试

S. Kuball, G. Hughes, I. Gilchrist
{"title":"基于场景的可靠性单元测试","authors":"S. Kuball, G. Hughes, I. Gilchrist","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2002.981646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical software testing (SST) is an important means for the quantification of software dependability. The concept of SST is that the software is executed on statistically generated test-cases that simulate the software's operating environment. As opposed to SST tests, coverage tests are engineered to execute each statement, decision, Boolean expression etc. at least once. Coverage testing is required by many standards, SST is not required by the standards. Coverage testing however cannot quantify reliability. In this paper, we want to investigate how to link these two important testing strategies. We want to maintain the features of SST, which allow us to quantify dependability, but combine them with a view towards code-coverage. The aim is to not only perform SST, but perform SST on the full code and thus achieve a dependability estimate that is attached to all code-parts. We demonstrate on a software example, taken from the protection system of a heavy water reactor, how to achieve this, by creating a link between the structure of the software input-space and the structure of the code.","PeriodicalId":395613,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scenario-based unit testing for reliability\",\"authors\":\"S. Kuball, G. Hughes, I. Gilchrist\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2002.981646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statistical software testing (SST) is an important means for the quantification of software dependability. The concept of SST is that the software is executed on statistically generated test-cases that simulate the software's operating environment. As opposed to SST tests, coverage tests are engineered to execute each statement, decision, Boolean expression etc. at least once. Coverage testing is required by many standards, SST is not required by the standards. Coverage testing however cannot quantify reliability. In this paper, we want to investigate how to link these two important testing strategies. We want to maintain the features of SST, which allow us to quantify dependability, but combine them with a view towards code-coverage. The aim is to not only perform SST, but perform SST on the full code and thus achieve a dependability estimate that is attached to all code-parts. We demonstrate on a software example, taken from the protection system of a heavy water reactor, how to achieve this, by creating a link between the structure of the software input-space and the structure of the code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2002.981646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2002.981646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

统计软件测试(SST)是软件可靠性量化的重要手段。SST的概念是软件在模拟软件操作环境的统计生成的测试用例上执行。与SST测试相反,覆盖率测试被设计为至少执行每个语句、决策、布尔表达式等一次。覆盖测试是许多标准所要求的,而SST则不是标准所要求的。然而,覆盖测试不能量化可靠性。在本文中,我们想探讨如何将这两种重要的测试策略联系起来。我们想要维护SST的特性,它允许我们量化可靠性,但是将它们与代码覆盖的观点结合起来。其目的不仅是执行SST,而且是在整个代码上执行SST,从而实现附加到所有代码部分的可靠性估计。我们以一个重水反应堆保护系统为例,通过在软件输入空间的结构和代码的结构之间创建一个链接来演示如何实现这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scenario-based unit testing for reliability
Statistical software testing (SST) is an important means for the quantification of software dependability. The concept of SST is that the software is executed on statistically generated test-cases that simulate the software's operating environment. As opposed to SST tests, coverage tests are engineered to execute each statement, decision, Boolean expression etc. at least once. Coverage testing is required by many standards, SST is not required by the standards. Coverage testing however cannot quantify reliability. In this paper, we want to investigate how to link these two important testing strategies. We want to maintain the features of SST, which allow us to quantify dependability, but combine them with a view towards code-coverage. The aim is to not only perform SST, but perform SST on the full code and thus achieve a dependability estimate that is attached to all code-parts. We demonstrate on a software example, taken from the protection system of a heavy water reactor, how to achieve this, by creating a link between the structure of the software input-space and the structure of the code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信