韩国终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统前后死亡供肝移植预后的比较研究:单中心经验

J. A. Lee, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, C. Kwon, J. Joh
{"title":"韩国终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统前后死亡供肝移植预后的比较研究:单中心经验","authors":"J. A. Lee, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, C. Kwon, J. Joh","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Korea. This study was conducted to reveal the changes before and after the MELD system. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2017, 71 patient datapoints were collected from recipients who underwent DDLT in a single center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the allocation system (41 in the MELD group, 30 in the CTP group). Results: The MELD score of the two groups differed significantly (36.8±4.5 in the MELD group, 26.0±8.1 in the CTP group, P=0.001). There was no difference in etiology for liver transplantation, 6-month survival rate, or in-hospital stay. However, complication rate and re-admission rate within the first 3 months were higher in the MELD group (78%, 56%). No one received a DDLT because of an incentive system for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: Despite the short-term follow-up period, the new allocation rule reflects the severity of the patients. Almost all patients who underwent DDLT when they had a high MELD score and then suffered from morbidity; however, this problem was associated with organ shortage, not the allocation system.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Study of Outcomes of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation before and after Korean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) System: Single Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Lee, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, C. Kwon, J. Joh\",\"doi\":\"10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Korea. This study was conducted to reveal the changes before and after the MELD system. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2017, 71 patient datapoints were collected from recipients who underwent DDLT in a single center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the allocation system (41 in the MELD group, 30 in the CTP group). Results: The MELD score of the two groups differed significantly (36.8±4.5 in the MELD group, 26.0±8.1 in the CTP group, P=0.001). There was no difference in etiology for liver transplantation, 6-month survival rate, or in-hospital stay. However, complication rate and re-admission rate within the first 3 months were higher in the MELD group (78%, 56%). No one received a DDLT because of an incentive system for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: Despite the short-term follow-up period, the new allocation rule reflects the severity of the patients. Almost all patients who underwent DDLT when they had a high MELD score and then suffered from morbidity; however, this problem was associated with organ shortage, not the allocation system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2018.32.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:2016年6月,韩国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)的分配系统取代了基于child - turcote - pugh (CTP)评分的死亡供肝移植(DDLT)分配系统。本研究旨在揭示MELD系统前后的变化。方法:从2015年1月至2017年3月,从单个中心接受DDLT的患者中收集71个患者数据点。根据分配制度将患者分为两组(MELD组41例,CTP组30例)。结果:两组MELD评分差异有统计学意义(MELD组36.8±4.5分,CTP组26.0±8.1分,P=0.001)。肝移植的病因、6个月生存率和住院时间没有差异。然而,MELD组前3个月内的并发症发生率和再入院率较高(78%,56%)。由于肝细胞癌的激励机制,没有人接受DDLT。结论:尽管随访时间较短,但新的分配规则反映了患者的严重程度。几乎所有在MELD评分较高时接受DDLT的患者都出现了发病率;然而,这个问题与器官短缺有关,而不是分配制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Study of Outcomes of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation before and after Korean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) System: Single Center Experience
Background: In June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Korea. This study was conducted to reveal the changes before and after the MELD system. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2017, 71 patient datapoints were collected from recipients who underwent DDLT in a single center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the allocation system (41 in the MELD group, 30 in the CTP group). Results: The MELD score of the two groups differed significantly (36.8±4.5 in the MELD group, 26.0±8.1 in the CTP group, P=0.001). There was no difference in etiology for liver transplantation, 6-month survival rate, or in-hospital stay. However, complication rate and re-admission rate within the first 3 months were higher in the MELD group (78%, 56%). No one received a DDLT because of an incentive system for hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions: Despite the short-term follow-up period, the new allocation rule reflects the severity of the patients. Almost all patients who underwent DDLT when they had a high MELD score and then suffered from morbidity; however, this problem was associated with organ shortage, not the allocation system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信