那就告他

J. Farrier
{"title":"那就告他","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores a diverse set of member lawsuits, spanning the “pocket veto,” three cases related to treaty changes/withdrawals, and a case on the Affordable Care Act that was settled recently. All of these cases highlight the way that conventional partisan warfare creeps into legal battles. The member-plaintiffs in these cases are attacking opposition presidents for institutional behaviors and constitutional interpretations that they appear to forgive in their own presidents. This partisan dynamic dilutes the power and potential significance of the claim. Moreover, if federal courts are being dragged into separation of powers questions just to expand the arena of partisan combat, there is no deep reset of systemic balance of power in the constitutional order. Congressional power should mean more than defending one's own party when in the minority or in the majority under conditions of divided government.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"So Sue Him\",\"authors\":\"J. Farrier\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores a diverse set of member lawsuits, spanning the “pocket veto,” three cases related to treaty changes/withdrawals, and a case on the Affordable Care Act that was settled recently. All of these cases highlight the way that conventional partisan warfare creeps into legal battles. The member-plaintiffs in these cases are attacking opposition presidents for institutional behaviors and constitutional interpretations that they appear to forgive in their own presidents. This partisan dynamic dilutes the power and potential significance of the claim. Moreover, if federal courts are being dragged into separation of powers questions just to expand the arena of partisan combat, there is no deep reset of systemic balance of power in the constitutional order. Congressional power should mean more than defending one's own party when in the minority or in the majority under conditions of divided government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨了一系列不同的成员诉讼,包括“口袋否决权”,三个与条约变更/退出有关的案件,以及最近解决的一个关于《合理医疗费用法案》的案件。所有这些案件都突显了传统的党派之争是如何渗透到法律斗争中的。这些案件中的原告成员攻击反对派总统的制度行为和宪法解释,而他们似乎原谅了自己的总统。这种党派之争削弱了这一主张的力量和潜在意义。此外,如果联邦法院被拖入三权分立问题只是为了扩大党派斗争的舞台,那么宪法秩序中的系统性权力平衡就不会得到深刻的重置。国会权力不应仅仅意味着在政府分裂的情况下,无论是在少数派还是多数派中捍卫自己的政党。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
So Sue Him
This chapter explores a diverse set of member lawsuits, spanning the “pocket veto,” three cases related to treaty changes/withdrawals, and a case on the Affordable Care Act that was settled recently. All of these cases highlight the way that conventional partisan warfare creeps into legal battles. The member-plaintiffs in these cases are attacking opposition presidents for institutional behaviors and constitutional interpretations that they appear to forgive in their own presidents. This partisan dynamic dilutes the power and potential significance of the claim. Moreover, if federal courts are being dragged into separation of powers questions just to expand the arena of partisan combat, there is no deep reset of systemic balance of power in the constitutional order. Congressional power should mean more than defending one's own party when in the minority or in the majority under conditions of divided government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信