IPO承销商是否为他们提供的服务付费?

M. Meoli, A. Signori, S. Vismara
{"title":"IPO承销商是否为他们提供的服务付费?","authors":"M. Meoli, A. Signori, S. Vismara","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2007982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More reputable underwriters are paid more for taking companies public, because they are expected to provide a better service. However, independently from their reputation, underwriters provide different optional services to the firms they take public. We question whether the services provided are related to the gross spreads. Based on declarations in the prospectuses of Italian IPOs, we find that asking underwriters to stabilize the price does increase the spread. Issuers can therefore pay lower fees by facing the risk of no aftermarket support for their stocks. Conversely, liquidity support does not drive the spread. We further investigate whether the underwriters’ declarations are actually pursued, and find that in general, they do seem to act according to the issuers’ interests. Nevertheless, the fees charged are not informative about the provision of these services. Rather, other factors such as negative price revisions and negative (or low) underpricing drive the provision of these services.","PeriodicalId":321552,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are IPO Underwriters Paid for the Services They Provide?\",\"authors\":\"M. Meoli, A. Signori, S. Vismara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2007982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More reputable underwriters are paid more for taking companies public, because they are expected to provide a better service. However, independently from their reputation, underwriters provide different optional services to the firms they take public. We question whether the services provided are related to the gross spreads. Based on declarations in the prospectuses of Italian IPOs, we find that asking underwriters to stabilize the price does increase the spread. Issuers can therefore pay lower fees by facing the risk of no aftermarket support for their stocks. Conversely, liquidity support does not drive the spread. We further investigate whether the underwriters’ declarations are actually pursued, and find that in general, they do seem to act according to the issuers’ interests. Nevertheless, the fees charged are not informative about the provision of these services. Rather, other factors such as negative price revisions and negative (or low) underpricing drive the provision of these services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信誉良好的承销商在帮助公司上市的过程中获得的报酬更高,因为人们期望他们提供更好的服务。然而,与他们的声誉无关,承销商为他们上市的公司提供不同的可选服务。我们质疑所提供的服务是否与总息差有关。根据意大利ipo招股说明书中的声明,我们发现要求承销商稳定价格确实会增加价差。因此,发行者可以支付较低的费用,因为他们的股票可能面临没有售后市场支持的风险。相反,流动性支持不会推动价差。我们进一步调查了承销商的声明是否真的被追究,并发现一般来说,他们似乎确实根据发行人的利益行事。然而,所收取的费用并不能说明提供这些服务的情况。相反,诸如负面价格修正和负面(或低)定价等其他因素推动了这些服务的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are IPO Underwriters Paid for the Services They Provide?
More reputable underwriters are paid more for taking companies public, because they are expected to provide a better service. However, independently from their reputation, underwriters provide different optional services to the firms they take public. We question whether the services provided are related to the gross spreads. Based on declarations in the prospectuses of Italian IPOs, we find that asking underwriters to stabilize the price does increase the spread. Issuers can therefore pay lower fees by facing the risk of no aftermarket support for their stocks. Conversely, liquidity support does not drive the spread. We further investigate whether the underwriters’ declarations are actually pursued, and find that in general, they do seem to act according to the issuers’ interests. Nevertheless, the fees charged are not informative about the provision of these services. Rather, other factors such as negative price revisions and negative (or low) underpricing drive the provision of these services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信