建议的来源和决策任务对请求专家建议的决策的影响

Robin M. Richter, Maria Jose Valladares, Steven C. Sutherland
{"title":"建议的来源和决策任务对请求专家建议的决策的影响","authors":"Robin M. Richter, Maria Jose Valladares, Steven C. Sutherland","doi":"10.1145/3301275.3302279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automation has become a deeply integrated aspect of our everyday activities. Many factors affect whether we rely on and comply with recommendations that we receive, from both human and automated experts. In the present study, participants were presented with advice from either a human or automated expert to complete one of two decision tasks: assigning teams to find human survivors or assigning teams to find and repair oil wells. Participants played 1 of 4 modified versions of the Search and Rescue video game and, on each trial, were asked to choose 3 of 12 locations to which to send search teams. Participants could request advice from a drone or human expert (confederate), depending on the condition to which they were assigned. Participants utilized automation more consistently than the human expert regardless of the decision task. We discuss possible explanations of our results and how they affect design considerations for automation.","PeriodicalId":153096,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the source of advice and decision task on decisions to request expert advice\",\"authors\":\"Robin M. Richter, Maria Jose Valladares, Steven C. Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3301275.3302279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automation has become a deeply integrated aspect of our everyday activities. Many factors affect whether we rely on and comply with recommendations that we receive, from both human and automated experts. In the present study, participants were presented with advice from either a human or automated expert to complete one of two decision tasks: assigning teams to find human survivors or assigning teams to find and repair oil wells. Participants played 1 of 4 modified versions of the Search and Rescue video game and, on each trial, were asked to choose 3 of 12 locations to which to send search teams. Participants could request advice from a drone or human expert (confederate), depending on the condition to which they were assigned. Participants utilized automation more consistently than the human expert regardless of the decision task. We discuss possible explanations of our results and how they affect design considerations for automation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

自动化已经成为我们日常活动的一个深度集成的方面。许多因素会影响我们是否依赖和遵守我们从人类和自动专家那里得到的建议。在目前的研究中,参与者被提供了来自人类或自动化专家的建议,以完成两项决策任务中的一项:指派团队寻找人类幸存者或指派团队寻找和修复油井。参与者玩4个修改版的“搜索与救援”视频游戏中的1个,每次测试都要求他们从12个地点中选择3个派出搜救队的地点。参与者可以根据他们被分配到的条件,向无人机或人类专家(助手)寻求建议。无论决策任务是什么,参与者比人类专家更一致地使用自动化。我们讨论了对结果的可能解释,以及它们如何影响自动化的设计考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the source of advice and decision task on decisions to request expert advice
Automation has become a deeply integrated aspect of our everyday activities. Many factors affect whether we rely on and comply with recommendations that we receive, from both human and automated experts. In the present study, participants were presented with advice from either a human or automated expert to complete one of two decision tasks: assigning teams to find human survivors or assigning teams to find and repair oil wells. Participants played 1 of 4 modified versions of the Search and Rescue video game and, on each trial, were asked to choose 3 of 12 locations to which to send search teams. Participants could request advice from a drone or human expert (confederate), depending on the condition to which they were assigned. Participants utilized automation more consistently than the human expert regardless of the decision task. We discuss possible explanations of our results and how they affect design considerations for automation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信