企业家的男子气概:重塑白手起家的男人

James V. Catano
{"title":"企业家的男子气概:重塑白手起家的男人","authors":"James V. Catano","doi":"10.1111/J.1542-734X.2000.2302_1.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps the most wide-ranging, durable, and popular tale in Western culture is the myth of the selfmade man. The most well-known American versions of the myth are Horatio Alger's morally uplifting, turn-of-the-century tales of overcoming less-thanspectacular origins and reaping justly deserved personal rewards. Popular interest in such tales has underwritten a cottage industry in entrepreneurial autobiographies and non-fiction essays during the last two decades. My basic claim here is that the popularity of these tales of corporate prowess rests on their ability to embody the most persistent and complex of social values-those devoted to gender. What is commonly being offered in the myth, which is dominated by male figures, is access to real masculinity. At the same time, these tales do not resolve masculine gender tensions. Instead they reenact psychological and social conflicts over \"correct\" gender behavior (exemplified in the myth's own internal contradictions) that cannot be readily resolved. In short, representations of masculine self-making are symptomatic of an incomplete symmetry between social claim and individual experience. The resulting disparity between societal goals and self-perceived identity produces an anxiety that paradoxically reinforces interest in the myth, as both society and its subjects attempt to perform and re-perform the myth's contradictory behaviors in an ongoing attempt to alleviate the very tensions the myth dramatizes. Among the contradictory appeals that the myth produces, one key element is a call to fight one's way up the corporate ladder that is paradoxically accompanied by an appeal to anti-institutionalism, to a rejection of the status quo and the flabby, bureaucratic, non-masculinity embodied in the aging fathers and the corporate powers-that-be. This is not a new argument, of course. Andrew Carnegie used it in another classic of the genre, his own autobiography of men and steel. But like all social myths, gender is subject to historical strains that intensify its internal contradictions, and one modern source of deep tension is the clash between Carnegie's still-active ideal of nineteenthcentury rugged individualism, especially entrepreneurial self-making, and the middle-class reality of modern corporate life. The twentieth-century rise of modern corporations has shifted the more blatantly masculinized, oedipal motifs of nineteenth-century industrial rhetoric, such as portrayals of fistfights between workers and managers, toward representations based on a carefully maintained blend of anti-institutionalism, corporate prowess, and personal risk. To these motifs is added a rhetorical dynamic that colors the mythic rhetoric as a whole: a call for movement forward into the future, which is paradoxically underwritten by nostalgia for the past. That nostalgia is further enhanced by the need to offset an end-of-the-century threat to the United States's industrial dominance, and the masculinity it underpins, with a renewed vision of economic strength, creativity, and masculine agency. Iacocca and the rebirth of Chrysler Motors provides one of the more successful dramatizations of this basic, middle-class success story. It does so, moreover, by masking its corporate connections and dependencies so well that the book has become \"essential reading\" in arenas as intriguing as Russia's newly formed, all-male school of New Business Technologies (Myre). Yet for all the popularity of Michael Douglas-like visions of corporate power, a deep uneasiness remains over portraying a masculinity ultimately dependent upon the very institutional frames that it decries. And as Russia readily demonstrates, the economic stage does not always provide corporate successes such as Chrysler's to act as a backdrop to a self-made success story. Steelmaking, for example, with all its elementsits raw power, huge consumption of energy, and Promethean drive to produce a product seen as alternatively molten, malleable, and the backbone of the western industrial nations' economic and urban risehas long been connected to general themes of masculinity in the popular ethos. …","PeriodicalId":134380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrepreneurial Masculinity: Re‐tooling the Self‐made Man\",\"authors\":\"James V. Catano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1542-734X.2000.2302_1.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perhaps the most wide-ranging, durable, and popular tale in Western culture is the myth of the selfmade man. The most well-known American versions of the myth are Horatio Alger's morally uplifting, turn-of-the-century tales of overcoming less-thanspectacular origins and reaping justly deserved personal rewards. Popular interest in such tales has underwritten a cottage industry in entrepreneurial autobiographies and non-fiction essays during the last two decades. My basic claim here is that the popularity of these tales of corporate prowess rests on their ability to embody the most persistent and complex of social values-those devoted to gender. What is commonly being offered in the myth, which is dominated by male figures, is access to real masculinity. At the same time, these tales do not resolve masculine gender tensions. Instead they reenact psychological and social conflicts over \\\"correct\\\" gender behavior (exemplified in the myth's own internal contradictions) that cannot be readily resolved. In short, representations of masculine self-making are symptomatic of an incomplete symmetry between social claim and individual experience. The resulting disparity between societal goals and self-perceived identity produces an anxiety that paradoxically reinforces interest in the myth, as both society and its subjects attempt to perform and re-perform the myth's contradictory behaviors in an ongoing attempt to alleviate the very tensions the myth dramatizes. Among the contradictory appeals that the myth produces, one key element is a call to fight one's way up the corporate ladder that is paradoxically accompanied by an appeal to anti-institutionalism, to a rejection of the status quo and the flabby, bureaucratic, non-masculinity embodied in the aging fathers and the corporate powers-that-be. This is not a new argument, of course. Andrew Carnegie used it in another classic of the genre, his own autobiography of men and steel. But like all social myths, gender is subject to historical strains that intensify its internal contradictions, and one modern source of deep tension is the clash between Carnegie's still-active ideal of nineteenthcentury rugged individualism, especially entrepreneurial self-making, and the middle-class reality of modern corporate life. The twentieth-century rise of modern corporations has shifted the more blatantly masculinized, oedipal motifs of nineteenth-century industrial rhetoric, such as portrayals of fistfights between workers and managers, toward representations based on a carefully maintained blend of anti-institutionalism, corporate prowess, and personal risk. To these motifs is added a rhetorical dynamic that colors the mythic rhetoric as a whole: a call for movement forward into the future, which is paradoxically underwritten by nostalgia for the past. That nostalgia is further enhanced by the need to offset an end-of-the-century threat to the United States's industrial dominance, and the masculinity it underpins, with a renewed vision of economic strength, creativity, and masculine agency. Iacocca and the rebirth of Chrysler Motors provides one of the more successful dramatizations of this basic, middle-class success story. It does so, moreover, by masking its corporate connections and dependencies so well that the book has become \\\"essential reading\\\" in arenas as intriguing as Russia's newly formed, all-male school of New Business Technologies (Myre). Yet for all the popularity of Michael Douglas-like visions of corporate power, a deep uneasiness remains over portraying a masculinity ultimately dependent upon the very institutional frames that it decries. And as Russia readily demonstrates, the economic stage does not always provide corporate successes such as Chrysler's to act as a backdrop to a self-made success story. Steelmaking, for example, with all its elementsits raw power, huge consumption of energy, and Promethean drive to produce a product seen as alternatively molten, malleable, and the backbone of the western industrial nations' economic and urban risehas long been connected to general themes of masculinity in the popular ethos. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":134380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1542-734X.2000.2302_1.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1542-734X.2000.2302_1.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

也许在西方文化中最广泛、最持久、最流行的故事是白手起家的神话。这个神话最著名的美国版本是霍雷肖·阿尔杰(Horatio Alger)的道德振奋、世纪之交的故事,讲述了人们如何克服不那么壮观的出身,并获得应得的个人回报。在过去的二十年里,人们对这类故事的普遍兴趣催生了创业自传和非小说类散文的家庭手工业。我在这里的基本观点是,这些关于企业实力的故事之所以受欢迎,是因为它们体现了最持久、最复杂的社会价值观——那些与性别有关的价值观。在这个由男性角色主导的神话中,通常提供的是通往真正男子气概的途径。与此同时,这些故事并没有解决男性的性别紧张关系。相反,他们重新演绎了关于“正确”性别行为的心理和社会冲突(以神话本身的内部矛盾为例),这些冲突无法轻易解决。简而言之,男性自我创造的表现是社会要求和个人经验之间不完全对称的症状。社会目标和自我认知之间的差异产生了一种焦虑,矛盾的是,这种焦虑增强了人们对神话的兴趣,因为社会和它的主体都试图表演和重新表演神话中矛盾的行为,以持续地试图缓解神话戏剧化的紧张局势。在这一神话产生的矛盾诉求中,一个关键因素是呼吁人们在公司的阶梯上奋力拼搏,这一诉求矛盾地伴随着对反制度主义的呼吁,对现状的拒绝,以及对年迈的父亲和公司当权者所体现的软弱、官僚和非男子气概的拒绝。当然,这不是一个新的论点。安德鲁·卡耐基在另一部关于男人与钢铁的自传中也使用了这个词。但是,就像所有的社会神话一样,性别也受到历史压力的影响,加剧了其内部矛盾,而深刻矛盾的一个现代根源是卡内基仍然活跃的19世纪粗粝的个人主义理想,特别是企业家自我创造,与现代企业生活的中产阶级现实之间的冲突。20世纪现代企业的崛起,已经将19世纪工业修辞中更为明显的男性化、俄狄浦斯式的主题,比如描绘工人和经理之间的打斗,转变为一种精心维护的反制度主义、企业实力和个人风险的混合表现。对于这些主题,添加了一种修辞动态,使神话修辞成为一个整体:对未来运动的呼吁,矛盾的是对过去的怀旧。美国工业主导地位及其所支撑的男子气概在本世纪末受到威胁,需要用一种对经济实力、创造力和男子气概的新愿景来抵消这种威胁,这进一步增强了这种怀旧情绪。艾柯卡和克莱斯勒汽车公司的重生为中产阶级的基本成功故事提供了更成功的戏剧化之一。此外,它还很好地掩盖了自己与企业的关系和依赖关系,以至于这本书在俄罗斯新成立的全是男性的新商业技术学院(Myre)等吸引人的领域成为了“必读读物”。然而,尽管迈克尔·道格拉斯(Michael douglas)式的企业权力愿景广受欢迎,但人们仍然对描绘一种最终依赖于它所谴责的制度框架的男子气概深感不安。正如俄罗斯很容易证明的那样,经济舞台并不总能提供克莱斯勒(Chrysler)等企业的成功,作为白手起家的成功故事的背景。以炼钢为例,炼钢的所有要素——原动力、巨大的能源消耗和普罗米修斯式的动力——都被认为是熔化的、可塑的,而西方工业国家的经济和城市崛起的支柱,长期以来一直与大众精神中的男性气概主题联系在一起。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entrepreneurial Masculinity: Re‐tooling the Self‐made Man
Perhaps the most wide-ranging, durable, and popular tale in Western culture is the myth of the selfmade man. The most well-known American versions of the myth are Horatio Alger's morally uplifting, turn-of-the-century tales of overcoming less-thanspectacular origins and reaping justly deserved personal rewards. Popular interest in such tales has underwritten a cottage industry in entrepreneurial autobiographies and non-fiction essays during the last two decades. My basic claim here is that the popularity of these tales of corporate prowess rests on their ability to embody the most persistent and complex of social values-those devoted to gender. What is commonly being offered in the myth, which is dominated by male figures, is access to real masculinity. At the same time, these tales do not resolve masculine gender tensions. Instead they reenact psychological and social conflicts over "correct" gender behavior (exemplified in the myth's own internal contradictions) that cannot be readily resolved. In short, representations of masculine self-making are symptomatic of an incomplete symmetry between social claim and individual experience. The resulting disparity between societal goals and self-perceived identity produces an anxiety that paradoxically reinforces interest in the myth, as both society and its subjects attempt to perform and re-perform the myth's contradictory behaviors in an ongoing attempt to alleviate the very tensions the myth dramatizes. Among the contradictory appeals that the myth produces, one key element is a call to fight one's way up the corporate ladder that is paradoxically accompanied by an appeal to anti-institutionalism, to a rejection of the status quo and the flabby, bureaucratic, non-masculinity embodied in the aging fathers and the corporate powers-that-be. This is not a new argument, of course. Andrew Carnegie used it in another classic of the genre, his own autobiography of men and steel. But like all social myths, gender is subject to historical strains that intensify its internal contradictions, and one modern source of deep tension is the clash between Carnegie's still-active ideal of nineteenthcentury rugged individualism, especially entrepreneurial self-making, and the middle-class reality of modern corporate life. The twentieth-century rise of modern corporations has shifted the more blatantly masculinized, oedipal motifs of nineteenth-century industrial rhetoric, such as portrayals of fistfights between workers and managers, toward representations based on a carefully maintained blend of anti-institutionalism, corporate prowess, and personal risk. To these motifs is added a rhetorical dynamic that colors the mythic rhetoric as a whole: a call for movement forward into the future, which is paradoxically underwritten by nostalgia for the past. That nostalgia is further enhanced by the need to offset an end-of-the-century threat to the United States's industrial dominance, and the masculinity it underpins, with a renewed vision of economic strength, creativity, and masculine agency. Iacocca and the rebirth of Chrysler Motors provides one of the more successful dramatizations of this basic, middle-class success story. It does so, moreover, by masking its corporate connections and dependencies so well that the book has become "essential reading" in arenas as intriguing as Russia's newly formed, all-male school of New Business Technologies (Myre). Yet for all the popularity of Michael Douglas-like visions of corporate power, a deep uneasiness remains over portraying a masculinity ultimately dependent upon the very institutional frames that it decries. And as Russia readily demonstrates, the economic stage does not always provide corporate successes such as Chrysler's to act as a backdrop to a self-made success story. Steelmaking, for example, with all its elementsits raw power, huge consumption of energy, and Promethean drive to produce a product seen as alternatively molten, malleable, and the backbone of the western industrial nations' economic and urban risehas long been connected to general themes of masculinity in the popular ethos. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信