建筑环境模拟分析整合于设计流程之教育成效评估

林權萱 林權萱, 蔡耀賢 Chuan-Hsuan Lin, 陳柏睿 Yaw-Shyan Tsay
{"title":"建筑环境模拟分析整合于设计流程之教育成效评估","authors":"林權萱 林權萱, 蔡耀賢 Chuan-Hsuan Lin, 陳柏睿 Yaw-Shyan Tsay","doi":"10.53106/101632122021060116007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 近年來,由諸多文獻中發現在建築設計過程中以建築性能分析軟體輔助之相關議題,然而無論在業界實務端或學院教育,對於在設計流程中導入建築性能分析軟體的可信度、時間點、意願、操作流程及相關背景知識仍未成熟。因此,本研究著重於整合國內實務端設計工作流程與重點模擬分析項目,提出一套學習的參考架構,並對設計者進行教育訓練,以消弭設計階段應用分析軟體的障礙。本研究以7名建築系學生為對象,進行一學期的教育訓練實驗,透過問卷和訪談進行綜合性分析以評估訓練成效。實驗結果發現教育訓練具有良好成效,參與者對建築性能分析軟體的知識有顯著提升。雖然個體間學習成效存在差異(如參與者對技術易用性的認知不同),但對技術的價值認知與採納意願則皆有顯著提升。然而,建築能耗分析軟體被發現訓練成效不彰,可能歸因為該能源相關專業本身之複雜性,訓練時間不足,個體學習態度等,導致不容易在短期課程中立即獲得良好學習成效,其在設計中的應用也受到限制。藉此,本研究最後亦提出對未來建築學院在理論與分析軟體操作的整合課程建議,以協助學習者能夠循序漸進,有效的應用輔助分析軟體回饋建築設計。\n Since the sustainable issue has become a trend in recent years, the adoption of building performance analysis (BPA) tools in design process is not a news today. However, according to the literature review revealing the “rule of thumb” was still the measure when architects discuss the green building design. Also, the lack of background knowledge could always be noticed between the intention of sustainability and design works in either academic education or design practice. Therefore, this study was started on the BPA software training course of basic knowledge and application through the early design phase. To close the gap, a guided workflow of BPA tools was proposed for the designer’s needs. The guided workflow was used to draft a pilot experiment course in architectural education with 7 trainees. In order to enhance students’ fundamental knowledge. The results of the experiment showed subjects have a significant improvement on the knowledge of BPA tools (p-value <0.05), nevertheless, energy simulation learning showed on the opposite. The results also indicated that the individual discrepancy might cause the effect on factor of “Perceived Ease of Use”. In conclusion, based on the results of experiment above, the grading course with learning objectives, training methods and contents have been modified and suggested.\n \n","PeriodicalId":291191,"journal":{"name":"建築學報","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"建築環境模擬分析整合於設計流程之教育成效評估\",\"authors\":\"林權萱 林權萱, 蔡耀賢 Chuan-Hsuan Lin, 陳柏睿 Yaw-Shyan Tsay\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/101632122021060116007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 近年來,由諸多文獻中發現在建築設計過程中以建築性能分析軟體輔助之相關議題,然而無論在業界實務端或學院教育,對於在設計流程中導入建築性能分析軟體的可信度、時間點、意願、操作流程及相關背景知識仍未成熟。因此,本研究著重於整合國內實務端設計工作流程與重點模擬分析項目,提出一套學習的參考架構,並對設計者進行教育訓練,以消弭設計階段應用分析軟體的障礙。本研究以7名建築系學生為對象,進行一學期的教育訓練實驗,透過問卷和訪談進行綜合性分析以評估訓練成效。實驗結果發現教育訓練具有良好成效,參與者對建築性能分析軟體的知識有顯著提升。雖然個體間學習成效存在差異(如參與者對技術易用性的認知不同),但對技術的價值認知與採納意願則皆有顯著提升。然而,建築能耗分析軟體被發現訓練成效不彰,可能歸因為該能源相關專業本身之複雜性,訓練時間不足,個體學習態度等,導致不容易在短期課程中立即獲得良好學習成效,其在設計中的應用也受到限制。藉此,本研究最後亦提出對未來建築學院在理論與分析軟體操作的整合課程建議,以協助學習者能夠循序漸進,有效的應用輔助分析軟體回饋建築設計。\\n Since the sustainable issue has become a trend in recent years, the adoption of building performance analysis (BPA) tools in design process is not a news today. However, according to the literature review revealing the “rule of thumb” was still the measure when architects discuss the green building design. Also, the lack of background knowledge could always be noticed between the intention of sustainability and design works in either academic education or design practice. Therefore, this study was started on the BPA software training course of basic knowledge and application through the early design phase. To close the gap, a guided workflow of BPA tools was proposed for the designer’s needs. The guided workflow was used to draft a pilot experiment course in architectural education with 7 trainees. In order to enhance students’ fundamental knowledge. The results of the experiment showed subjects have a significant improvement on the knowledge of BPA tools (p-value <0.05), nevertheless, energy simulation learning showed on the opposite. The results also indicated that the individual discrepancy might cause the effect on factor of “Perceived Ease of Use”. In conclusion, based on the results of experiment above, the grading course with learning objectives, training methods and contents have been modified and suggested.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":291191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"建築學報\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"建築學報\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/101632122021060116007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"建築學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/101632122021060116007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,由诸多文献中发现在建筑设计过程中以建筑性能分析软体辅助之相关议题,然而无论在业界实务端或学院教育,对于在设计流程中导入建筑性能分析软体的可信度、时间点、意愿、操作流程及相关背景知识仍未成熟。因此,本研究著重于整合国内实务端设计工作流程与重点模拟分析项目,提出一套学习的参考架构,并对设计者进行教育训练,以消弭设计阶段应用分析软体的障碍。本研究以7名建筑系学生为对象,进行一学期的教育训练实验,透过问卷和访谈进行综合性分析以评估训练成效。实验结果发现教育训练具有良好成效,参与者对建筑性能分析软体的知识有显著提升。虽然个体间学习成效存在差异(如参与者对技术易用性的认知不同),但对技术的价值认知与采纳意愿则皆有显著提升。然而,建筑能耗分析软体被发现训练成效不彰,可能归因为该能源相关专业本身之复杂性,训练时间不足,个体学习态度等,导致不容易在短期课程中立即获得良好学习成效,其在设计中的应用也受到限制。借此,本研究最后亦提出对未来建筑学院在理论与分析软体操作的整合课程建议,以协助学习者能够循序渐进,有效的应用辅助分析软体回馈建筑设计。 Since the sustainable issue has become a trend in recent years, the adoption of building performance analysis (BPA) tools in design process is not a news today. However, according to the literature review revealing the “rule of thumb” was still the measure when architects discuss the green building design. Also, the lack of background knowledge could always be noticed between the intention of sustainability and design works in either academic education or design practice. Therefore, this study was started on the BPA software training course of basic knowledge and application through the early design phase. To close the gap, a guided workflow of BPA tools was proposed for the designer’s needs. The guided workflow was used to draft a pilot experiment course in architectural education with 7 trainees. In order to enhance students’ fundamental knowledge. The results of the experiment showed subjects have a significant improvement on the knowledge of BPA tools (p-value <0.05), nevertheless, energy simulation learning showed on the opposite. The results also indicated that the individual discrepancy might cause the effect on factor of “Perceived Ease of Use”. In conclusion, based on the results of experiment above, the grading course with learning objectives, training methods and contents have been modified and suggested.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
建築環境模擬分析整合於設計流程之教育成效評估
近年來,由諸多文獻中發現在建築設計過程中以建築性能分析軟體輔助之相關議題,然而無論在業界實務端或學院教育,對於在設計流程中導入建築性能分析軟體的可信度、時間點、意願、操作流程及相關背景知識仍未成熟。因此,本研究著重於整合國內實務端設計工作流程與重點模擬分析項目,提出一套學習的參考架構,並對設計者進行教育訓練,以消弭設計階段應用分析軟體的障礙。本研究以7名建築系學生為對象,進行一學期的教育訓練實驗,透過問卷和訪談進行綜合性分析以評估訓練成效。實驗結果發現教育訓練具有良好成效,參與者對建築性能分析軟體的知識有顯著提升。雖然個體間學習成效存在差異(如參與者對技術易用性的認知不同),但對技術的價值認知與採納意願則皆有顯著提升。然而,建築能耗分析軟體被發現訓練成效不彰,可能歸因為該能源相關專業本身之複雜性,訓練時間不足,個體學習態度等,導致不容易在短期課程中立即獲得良好學習成效,其在設計中的應用也受到限制。藉此,本研究最後亦提出對未來建築學院在理論與分析軟體操作的整合課程建議,以協助學習者能夠循序漸進,有效的應用輔助分析軟體回饋建築設計。  Since the sustainable issue has become a trend in recent years, the adoption of building performance analysis (BPA) tools in design process is not a news today. However, according to the literature review revealing the “rule of thumb” was still the measure when architects discuss the green building design. Also, the lack of background knowledge could always be noticed between the intention of sustainability and design works in either academic education or design practice. Therefore, this study was started on the BPA software training course of basic knowledge and application through the early design phase. To close the gap, a guided workflow of BPA tools was proposed for the designer’s needs. The guided workflow was used to draft a pilot experiment course in architectural education with 7 trainees. In order to enhance students’ fundamental knowledge. The results of the experiment showed subjects have a significant improvement on the knowledge of BPA tools (p-value <0.05), nevertheless, energy simulation learning showed on the opposite. The results also indicated that the individual discrepancy might cause the effect on factor of “Perceived Ease of Use”. In conclusion, based on the results of experiment above, the grading course with learning objectives, training methods and contents have been modified and suggested.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信