RDPLF地区无菌性腹膜炎发病率的变异性

C. Verger, G. Veniez, M. Dratwa
{"title":"RDPLF地区无菌性腹膜炎发病率的变异性","authors":"C. Verger, G. Veniez, M. Dratwa","doi":"10.25796/bdd.v1i1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim : Peritonitis rate in the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF) is one episode per 32 patient-months. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the percentage of germ-free, or aseptic, peritonitis in all centers, and also by center.Methods : a first group representing all patients treated in metropolitan France in 2017 was selected to identify the rate of peritonitis and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis. Some centers have very low rates and the percentages of aseptic peritonitis would have had little value on small numbers, so we selected a second group of patients treated between 2010 and 2017 and retained centers that had at least 20 peritonitis. The rate of aseptic peritonitis in these centers was calculated individually per center. An additional survey was also carried out at the centers to find out their conditions for collecting and culturing effluent peritoneal dialysis fluid.Results : In 2017, out of 1071 peritonitis, 17.2% had no germ identified. During the period from January 2010 to December 2017, 6068 episodes of peritonitis were reported, including 954 without any germ identified (15.7%). One hundred and one centers had more than 20 episodes of peritonitis during this period. In these centers, the percentage of aseptic peritonitis has varied from less than 6% to more than 50%. The additional survey revealed that the sampling conditions varied considerably from one center to another and sometimes they even were not known to all members of the same team.Conclusion : the peritonitis rates in France and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis are in line with international recommendations. However, there is considerable inter-center variability which would require defining the best sampling conditions and the application of good bacteriological practices. It also highlights the interest of taking into account the center effect in statistical models used in studies. \n ","PeriodicalId":366938,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of aseptic peritonitis rates in the RDPLF\",\"authors\":\"C. Verger, G. Veniez, M. Dratwa\",\"doi\":\"10.25796/bdd.v1i1.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim : Peritonitis rate in the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF) is one episode per 32 patient-months. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the percentage of germ-free, or aseptic, peritonitis in all centers, and also by center.Methods : a first group representing all patients treated in metropolitan France in 2017 was selected to identify the rate of peritonitis and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis. Some centers have very low rates and the percentages of aseptic peritonitis would have had little value on small numbers, so we selected a second group of patients treated between 2010 and 2017 and retained centers that had at least 20 peritonitis. The rate of aseptic peritonitis in these centers was calculated individually per center. An additional survey was also carried out at the centers to find out their conditions for collecting and culturing effluent peritoneal dialysis fluid.Results : In 2017, out of 1071 peritonitis, 17.2% had no germ identified. During the period from January 2010 to December 2017, 6068 episodes of peritonitis were reported, including 954 without any germ identified (15.7%). One hundred and one centers had more than 20 episodes of peritonitis during this period. In these centers, the percentage of aseptic peritonitis has varied from less than 6% to more than 50%. The additional survey revealed that the sampling conditions varied considerably from one center to another and sometimes they even were not known to all members of the same team.Conclusion : the peritonitis rates in France and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis are in line with international recommendations. However, there is considerable inter-center variability which would require defining the best sampling conditions and the application of good bacteriological practices. It also highlights the interest of taking into account the center effect in statistical models used in studies. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":366938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v1i1.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v1i1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:法语腹膜透析登记(RDPLF)的腹膜炎发生率为每32个患者月发生一次。本研究的目的是评估所有中心的无菌或无菌性腹膜炎的百分比,也可以按中心进行评估。方法:选择2017年在法国大都市接受治疗的所有患者作为第一组,确定腹膜炎的发生率和无菌性腹膜炎的百分比。一些中心的发生率非常低,无菌性腹膜炎的百分比对小数字没有什么价值,因此我们选择了第二组在2010年至2017年期间接受治疗的患者,并保留了至少有20例腹膜炎的中心。这些中心的无菌性腹膜炎发生率按每个中心单独计算。还在各中心进行了另一项调查,以了解其收集和培养流出腹膜透析液的条件。结果:2017年1071例腹膜炎中,17.2%未检出细菌。2010年1月至2017年12月,共报告腹膜炎6068例,其中未检出细菌954例(15.7%)。101个中心在此期间有超过20次腹膜炎发作。在这些中心,无菌性腹膜炎的比例从不到6%到超过50%不等。另一项调查显示,每个中心的抽样条件差别很大,有时甚至同一小组的所有成员都不知道。结论:法国的腹膜炎发病率和无菌性腹膜炎的比例符合国际推荐。然而,中心之间存在相当大的差异,这需要确定最佳采样条件和应用良好的细菌学实践。它还强调了在研究中使用的统计模型中考虑中心效应的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability of aseptic peritonitis rates in the RDPLF
Aim : Peritonitis rate in the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF) is one episode per 32 patient-months. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the percentage of germ-free, or aseptic, peritonitis in all centers, and also by center.Methods : a first group representing all patients treated in metropolitan France in 2017 was selected to identify the rate of peritonitis and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis. Some centers have very low rates and the percentages of aseptic peritonitis would have had little value on small numbers, so we selected a second group of patients treated between 2010 and 2017 and retained centers that had at least 20 peritonitis. The rate of aseptic peritonitis in these centers was calculated individually per center. An additional survey was also carried out at the centers to find out their conditions for collecting and culturing effluent peritoneal dialysis fluid.Results : In 2017, out of 1071 peritonitis, 17.2% had no germ identified. During the period from January 2010 to December 2017, 6068 episodes of peritonitis were reported, including 954 without any germ identified (15.7%). One hundred and one centers had more than 20 episodes of peritonitis during this period. In these centers, the percentage of aseptic peritonitis has varied from less than 6% to more than 50%. The additional survey revealed that the sampling conditions varied considerably from one center to another and sometimes they even were not known to all members of the same team.Conclusion : the peritonitis rates in France and the percentage of aseptic peritonitis are in line with international recommendations. However, there is considerable inter-center variability which would require defining the best sampling conditions and the application of good bacteriological practices. It also highlights the interest of taking into account the center effect in statistical models used in studies.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信