屈折的类别

P. Matthews
{"title":"屈折的类别","authors":"P. Matthews","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198830115.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores inflectional categories. The criteria by which inflectional categories can be established were more complex. They are not of form alone, as was, for example, the distinction between basic or ‘first-struck’ words and ones morphologically ‘derived’. Nor are they of meaning only, as, for example, the varied ‘powers’ or subtypes of conjunctions. They were of correlations between meanings and forms. Modern ‘gender’ derives from terms in Greek (genos) and Latin (genus) that applied to classes whose members have a common birth or origin: thus ‘offspring’, ‘generation’, and ‘race’. For the grammarians, the criteria by which genders are distinguished were of how forms can combine in utterances. The remaining inflectional properties are those specific to verbs and participles. The most straightforward perhaps were those of what in modern grammars is called ‘voice’: in the term used by the Greek grammarians, such as Dionysius Thrax, diathesis.","PeriodicalId":288335,"journal":{"name":"What Graeco-Roman Grammar Was About","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflectional categories\",\"authors\":\"P. Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198830115.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores inflectional categories. The criteria by which inflectional categories can be established were more complex. They are not of form alone, as was, for example, the distinction between basic or ‘first-struck’ words and ones morphologically ‘derived’. Nor are they of meaning only, as, for example, the varied ‘powers’ or subtypes of conjunctions. They were of correlations between meanings and forms. Modern ‘gender’ derives from terms in Greek (genos) and Latin (genus) that applied to classes whose members have a common birth or origin: thus ‘offspring’, ‘generation’, and ‘race’. For the grammarians, the criteria by which genders are distinguished were of how forms can combine in utterances. The remaining inflectional properties are those specific to verbs and participles. The most straightforward perhaps were those of what in modern grammars is called ‘voice’: in the term used by the Greek grammarians, such as Dionysius Thrax, diathesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"What Graeco-Roman Grammar Was About\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"What Graeco-Roman Grammar Was About\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830115.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What Graeco-Roman Grammar Was About","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830115.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章探讨屈折词类。屈折分类建立的标准更为复杂。它们并不仅仅是形式上的区别,例如,基本词和词形上的“衍生词”之间的区别。它们不仅仅是有意义的,例如,不同的“力量”或连词的子类型。它们是意义和形式之间的关联。现代的“性别”一词源于希腊语(genos)和拉丁语(genus)中的术语,这些术语适用于成员有共同出生或起源的阶级:因此是“后代”、“世代”和“种族”。对于语法学家来说,区分性别的标准是形式如何在话语中组合。其余的屈折特性是动词和分词特有的。最直接的可能是那些在现代语法中被称为“声音”的东西:在希腊语法学家,如Dionysius Thrax所使用的术语中,素质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inflectional categories
This chapter explores inflectional categories. The criteria by which inflectional categories can be established were more complex. They are not of form alone, as was, for example, the distinction between basic or ‘first-struck’ words and ones morphologically ‘derived’. Nor are they of meaning only, as, for example, the varied ‘powers’ or subtypes of conjunctions. They were of correlations between meanings and forms. Modern ‘gender’ derives from terms in Greek (genos) and Latin (genus) that applied to classes whose members have a common birth or origin: thus ‘offspring’, ‘generation’, and ‘race’. For the grammarians, the criteria by which genders are distinguished were of how forms can combine in utterances. The remaining inflectional properties are those specific to verbs and participles. The most straightforward perhaps were those of what in modern grammars is called ‘voice’: in the term used by the Greek grammarians, such as Dionysius Thrax, diathesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信