POLRI框架分析在compa.com和sec处理著作权演示

Tiara Febriani, Lusia Handayani, Vinta Sevilla
{"title":"POLRI框架分析在compa.com和sec处理著作权演示","authors":"Tiara Febriani, Lusia Handayani, Vinta Sevilla","doi":"10.32509/pustakom.v5i1.1814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UU Cipta Kerja experienced pros and cons after it was passed on October 4, 2020. Therefore, various community groups hold demonstrations throughout October 2020. Polri has duties and obligations in handling and securing demonstrations. This incident attracted a lot of attention from Indonesian citizen, therefore online news portals such as kompas.com and detik.com raised this news. This study aims to find out how detik.com and kompas.com frame the police's handling demonstrations against the job creation law through Robert Entman's framing model and construct the reality of the news. This study uses qualitative descriptive approach with constructivist paradigm and uses framing analysis method. Results showed that kompas.com considered the Police to have not handled demonstrations according to their duties and obligations, while detik.com considered the Police to have handled demonstrations well. The construction of the reality of kompas.com is that the Police aggressive and repressive actions and tend to be pro to masses, while detik.com constructs that the Police perform well and corner the anarcho groups who are rioting. Differences in reality construction occur due differences in media ideology, where kompas.com has social democratic ideology that has  humanist approach, then detik.com has nationalist ideology that tends to side with government officials.","PeriodicalId":191134,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS FRAMING POLRI PADA PENANGANAN DEMONSTRASI UU CIPTA KERJA DI KOMPAS.COM DAN DETIK.COM\",\"authors\":\"Tiara Febriani, Lusia Handayani, Vinta Sevilla\",\"doi\":\"10.32509/pustakom.v5i1.1814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"UU Cipta Kerja experienced pros and cons after it was passed on October 4, 2020. Therefore, various community groups hold demonstrations throughout October 2020. Polri has duties and obligations in handling and securing demonstrations. This incident attracted a lot of attention from Indonesian citizen, therefore online news portals such as kompas.com and detik.com raised this news. This study aims to find out how detik.com and kompas.com frame the police's handling demonstrations against the job creation law through Robert Entman's framing model and construct the reality of the news. This study uses qualitative descriptive approach with constructivist paradigm and uses framing analysis method. Results showed that kompas.com considered the Police to have not handled demonstrations according to their duties and obligations, while detik.com considered the Police to have handled demonstrations well. The construction of the reality of kompas.com is that the Police aggressive and repressive actions and tend to be pro to masses, while detik.com constructs that the Police perform well and corner the anarcho groups who are rioting. Differences in reality construction occur due differences in media ideology, where kompas.com has social democratic ideology that has  humanist approach, then detik.com has nationalist ideology that tends to side with government officials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v5i1.1814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v5i1.1814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

UU Cipta Kerja在2020年10月4日通过后经历了利弊。因此,各种社区团体将在2020年10月举行示威活动。Polri有责任和义务处理和保护示威活动。这一事件引起了印尼公民的广泛关注,因此kompas.com和detik.com等在线新闻门户网站提出了这一消息。本研究旨在透过罗伯特·恩特曼(Robert Entman)的框架模型,找出detik.com和kompas.com如何建构警察处理抗议创造就业法的示威活动,并建构新闻的真实性。本研究采用建构主义范式的定性描述方法和框架分析方法。结果显示,kompas.com认为警方没有按照职责和义务处理示威活动,而detik.com则认为警方处理示威活动很好。kompas.com的现实建构是警察的侵略和镇压行动,倾向于亲群众,而detik.com则建构了警察的表现良好,并将骚乱的无政府组织包围起来。现实建构的差异是由于媒介意识形态的差异造成的,圆通网的社会民主主义意识形态倾向于人文主义,而大众网的民族主义意识形态倾向于站在政府官员一边。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS FRAMING POLRI PADA PENANGANAN DEMONSTRASI UU CIPTA KERJA DI KOMPAS.COM DAN DETIK.COM
UU Cipta Kerja experienced pros and cons after it was passed on October 4, 2020. Therefore, various community groups hold demonstrations throughout October 2020. Polri has duties and obligations in handling and securing demonstrations. This incident attracted a lot of attention from Indonesian citizen, therefore online news portals such as kompas.com and detik.com raised this news. This study aims to find out how detik.com and kompas.com frame the police's handling demonstrations against the job creation law through Robert Entman's framing model and construct the reality of the news. This study uses qualitative descriptive approach with constructivist paradigm and uses framing analysis method. Results showed that kompas.com considered the Police to have not handled demonstrations according to their duties and obligations, while detik.com considered the Police to have handled demonstrations well. The construction of the reality of kompas.com is that the Police aggressive and repressive actions and tend to be pro to masses, while detik.com constructs that the Police perform well and corner the anarcho groups who are rioting. Differences in reality construction occur due differences in media ideology, where kompas.com has social democratic ideology that has  humanist approach, then detik.com has nationalist ideology that tends to side with government officials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信