理解和无力。存在主义和现象学分析

E. Kosilova
{"title":"理解和无力。存在主义和现象学分析","authors":"E. Kosilova","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2023-1-31-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is about the issue of understanding as possession and other possibilities of understanding / misunderstanding. Understanding as possession was analyzed by Sartre, and he also introduces the figurative term “digestive” understanding. It means that while understanding we ourselves constitute meanings and use them for our own purposes, both mental and practical. Understanding and knowledge are types of power. The creation of projects and drafts, which Heidegger speaks of, is the mastery of the world. Subject’s activity, which is spoken of in post-Kantian epistemology, implies his desire to create and understand the world in his own way. Digestive understanding reduces the external meaning to a limited subjective meaning and thereby provokes protest. The concept of powerlessness is introduced as an existential disposition: the renunciation of power over the world. At the same time, there is a refusal to spread understanding as a digestive attitude to the subject. Complete misunderstanding is impossible, but meaning can be accepted as a gift, as Marion says. Marion’s concept of a saturated phenomenon in the case extends to the whole world. Levinas’s doctrine of the Other is also used: the Other turns out to be a saturated phenomenon that has its own meaning. Parallels can be drawn with the Sufi concept of “inner silence” and monastic practices. Refusal of the power and struggle leads to finding harmony with the world","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UNDERSTANDING AND POWERLESSNESS. AN EXISTENTIAL AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"E. Kosilova\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6401-2023-1-31-47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is about the issue of understanding as possession and other possibilities of understanding / misunderstanding. Understanding as possession was analyzed by Sartre, and he also introduces the figurative term “digestive” understanding. It means that while understanding we ourselves constitute meanings and use them for our own purposes, both mental and practical. Understanding and knowledge are types of power. The creation of projects and drafts, which Heidegger speaks of, is the mastery of the world. Subject’s activity, which is spoken of in post-Kantian epistemology, implies his desire to create and understand the world in his own way. Digestive understanding reduces the external meaning to a limited subjective meaning and thereby provokes protest. The concept of powerlessness is introduced as an existential disposition: the renunciation of power over the world. At the same time, there is a refusal to spread understanding as a digestive attitude to the subject. Complete misunderstanding is impossible, but meaning can be accepted as a gift, as Marion says. Marion’s concept of a saturated phenomenon in the case extends to the whole world. Levinas’s doctrine of the Other is also used: the Other turns out to be a saturated phenomenon that has its own meaning. Parallels can be drawn with the Sufi concept of “inner silence” and monastic practices. Refusal of the power and struggle leads to finding harmony with the world\",\"PeriodicalId\":127301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2023-1-31-47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2023-1-31-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是关于理解作为占有和其他理解/误解的可能性的问题。萨特分析了作为占有的理解,并引入了“消化”理解这一比喻性术语。这意味着,在理解的同时,我们自己也构成了意义,并将其用于我们自己的目的,无论是精神上的还是实践上的。理解和知识是力量的两种形式。海德格尔所说的计划和草稿的创造,是对世界的掌握。在后康德认识论中,主体的活动暗示着他以自己的方式创造和理解世界的愿望。消化性理解将外在意义简化为有限的主观意义,从而引发抗议。无能为力的概念是作为一种存在倾向引入的:放弃对世界的权力。与此同时,也有一种拒绝传播理解的态度,作为对这一主题的消化态度。完全的误解是不可能的,但正如马里恩所说,意义可以作为一种礼物被接受。马里昂对饱和现象的概念在这个案例中延伸到了整个世界。列维纳斯的他者学说也被使用:他者被证明是一个饱和的现象,有它自己的意义。苏菲派的“内心宁静”概念和修道实践也有相似之处。拒绝权力和斗争导致与世界的和谐
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UNDERSTANDING AND POWERLESSNESS. AN EXISTENTIAL AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
The article is about the issue of understanding as possession and other possibilities of understanding / misunderstanding. Understanding as possession was analyzed by Sartre, and he also introduces the figurative term “digestive” understanding. It means that while understanding we ourselves constitute meanings and use them for our own purposes, both mental and practical. Understanding and knowledge are types of power. The creation of projects and drafts, which Heidegger speaks of, is the mastery of the world. Subject’s activity, which is spoken of in post-Kantian epistemology, implies his desire to create and understand the world in his own way. Digestive understanding reduces the external meaning to a limited subjective meaning and thereby provokes protest. The concept of powerlessness is introduced as an existential disposition: the renunciation of power over the world. At the same time, there is a refusal to spread understanding as a digestive attitude to the subject. Complete misunderstanding is impossible, but meaning can be accepted as a gift, as Marion says. Marion’s concept of a saturated phenomenon in the case extends to the whole world. Levinas’s doctrine of the Other is also used: the Other turns out to be a saturated phenomenon that has its own meaning. Parallels can be drawn with the Sufi concept of “inner silence” and monastic practices. Refusal of the power and struggle leads to finding harmony with the world
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信