约瑟夫·科苏斯和伦理学作为意义与空虚之间的中介。

Pedro Fonseca Jorge
{"title":"约瑟夫·科苏斯和伦理学作为意义与空虚之间的中介。","authors":"Pedro Fonseca Jorge","doi":"10.53681/c1514225187514391s.31.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joseph Kosuth’s “One and Three Chairs” is considered the materialization of his 1969 essay “Art after Philosophy”, where he defined Conceptual Art, in which Meaning relied solely in its authors mind, expressed through a tireless repetition. Although this kind of reiteration could become means for an understanding, the fact that no effort was made (so to speak) in explaining one’s personal views, deprived the observer of the needed resources for its interpretation. Here lies a dilemma where Conceptual Art can be criticised, since, if an artist can hide behind the observer’s lack of understanding, he can, in fact, propose something that, also for him, is devoid of meaning. This is why Kosuth’s work may consist not in the materialization of Conceptual Art itself, but in the defence that at the foundation of an artist's work there must be strong ethical values, manifested precisely through a correlation between Sign, Signifier and Signified, in which “One and Three Chairs”, and his subsequent work, repeatedly dwells, defending the expression of an honesty that should guide Conceptual Art, in its own defence, but also of its authors’ and appreciators’ defence.","PeriodicalId":394078,"journal":{"name":"Convergences - Journal of Research and Arts Education","volume":"932 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joseph Kosuth and ethics as a mediator between meaning and emptiness.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Fonseca Jorge\",\"doi\":\"10.53681/c1514225187514391s.31.142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Joseph Kosuth’s “One and Three Chairs” is considered the materialization of his 1969 essay “Art after Philosophy”, where he defined Conceptual Art, in which Meaning relied solely in its authors mind, expressed through a tireless repetition. Although this kind of reiteration could become means for an understanding, the fact that no effort was made (so to speak) in explaining one’s personal views, deprived the observer of the needed resources for its interpretation. Here lies a dilemma where Conceptual Art can be criticised, since, if an artist can hide behind the observer’s lack of understanding, he can, in fact, propose something that, also for him, is devoid of meaning. This is why Kosuth’s work may consist not in the materialization of Conceptual Art itself, but in the defence that at the foundation of an artist's work there must be strong ethical values, manifested precisely through a correlation between Sign, Signifier and Signified, in which “One and Three Chairs”, and his subsequent work, repeatedly dwells, defending the expression of an honesty that should guide Conceptual Art, in its own defence, but also of its authors’ and appreciators’ defence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Convergences - Journal of Research and Arts Education\",\"volume\":\"932 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Convergences - Journal of Research and Arts Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.31.142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergences - Journal of Research and Arts Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.31.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约瑟夫·科苏斯的《一把和三把椅子》被认为是他1969年的文章《哲学之后的艺术》的具体化,在那篇文章中,他定义了概念艺术,其中意义完全依赖于作者的思想,通过不懈的重复来表达。虽然这种重复可以成为一种理解的手段,但事实上,没有努力(可以这么说)解释一个人的个人观点,剥夺了观察者解释所需要的资源。这里存在着一个观念艺术可以被批评的困境,因为,如果一个艺术家可以隐藏在观察者缺乏理解的背后,他实际上可以提出一些对他来说也没有意义的东西。这就是为什么Kosuth的作品可能不在于概念艺术本身的物化,而在于在艺术家作品的基础上必须有强烈的伦理价值,通过符号、能指和所指之间的关联来精确地表现出来,《一把和三把椅子》和他随后的作品反复存在,捍卫一种诚实的表达,这种表达应该指导概念艺术,为自己辩护,也为其作者和鉴赏者辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joseph Kosuth and ethics as a mediator between meaning and emptiness.
Joseph Kosuth’s “One and Three Chairs” is considered the materialization of his 1969 essay “Art after Philosophy”, where he defined Conceptual Art, in which Meaning relied solely in its authors mind, expressed through a tireless repetition. Although this kind of reiteration could become means for an understanding, the fact that no effort was made (so to speak) in explaining one’s personal views, deprived the observer of the needed resources for its interpretation. Here lies a dilemma where Conceptual Art can be criticised, since, if an artist can hide behind the observer’s lack of understanding, he can, in fact, propose something that, also for him, is devoid of meaning. This is why Kosuth’s work may consist not in the materialization of Conceptual Art itself, but in the defence that at the foundation of an artist's work there must be strong ethical values, manifested precisely through a correlation between Sign, Signifier and Signified, in which “One and Three Chairs”, and his subsequent work, repeatedly dwells, defending the expression of an honesty that should guide Conceptual Art, in its own defence, but also of its authors’ and appreciators’ defence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信