最后的评论

Andean Ontologies Pub Date : 2019-07-16 DOI:10.5744/florida/9780813056371.003.0012

{"title":"最后的评论","authors":"","doi":"10.5744/florida/9780813056371.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter reflects on the previous chapters, noting that the “ontological turn” calls for new ways of thinking about archaeological material. It notes in particular three themes that run through the various contributions: (1) using indigenous, post-conquest concepts to interrogate pre-Columbian materials; (2) rethinking the status of the human body; and (3) applying relational, or mereological, thinking to illuminate the Andean archaeological record.","PeriodicalId":356569,"journal":{"name":"Andean Ontologies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Final Commentaries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.5744/florida/9780813056371.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This concluding chapter reflects on the previous chapters, noting that the “ontological turn” calls for new ways of thinking about archaeological material. It notes in particular three themes that run through the various contributions: (1) using indigenous, post-conquest concepts to interrogate pre-Columbian materials; (2) rethinking the status of the human body; and (3) applying relational, or mereological, thinking to illuminate the Andean archaeological record.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Andean Ontologies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Andean Ontologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813056371.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andean Ontologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813056371.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这最后一章反映了前几章，注意到“本体论转向”要求新的方式来思考考古材料。它特别指出了贯穿各种贡献的三个主题:(1)使用土著的，征服后的概念来询问前哥伦布时期的材料;(2)重新思考人体的地位;(3)运用关系学或气象学的思维来阐明安第斯考古记录。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Final Commentaries

This concluding chapter reflects on the previous chapters, noting that the “ontological turn” calls for new ways of thinking about archaeological material. It notes in particular three themes that run through the various contributions: (1) using indigenous, post-conquest concepts to interrogate pre-Columbian materials; (2) rethinking the status of the human body; and (3) applying relational, or mereological, thinking to illuminate the Andean archaeological record.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Andean Ontologies

自引率

0.00%

发文量