机器人的个性化自我解释:目标与信念在儿童和成人机器人行为解释中的作用

Frank Kaptein, J. Broekens, K. Hindriks, Mark Antonius Neerincx
{"title":"机器人的个性化自我解释:目标与信念在儿童和成人机器人行为解释中的作用","authors":"Frank Kaptein, J. Broekens, K. Hindriks, Mark Antonius Neerincx","doi":"10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good explanation takes the user who is receiving the explanation into account. We aim to get a better understanding of user preferences and the differences between children and adults who receive explanations from a robot. We implemented a Nao-robot as a belief-desire-intention (BDI)-based agent and explained its actions using two different explanation styles. Both are based on how humans explain and justify their actions to each other. One explanation style communicates the beliefs that give context information on why the agent performed the action. The other explanation style communicates the goals that inform the user of the agent's desired state when performing the action. We conducted a user study (19 children, 19 adults) in which a Nao-robot performed actions to support type 1 diabetes mellitus management. We investigated the preference of children and adults for goalversus belief-based action explanations. From this, we learned that adults have a significantly higher tendency to prefer goal-based action explanations. This work is a necessary step in addressing the challenge of providing personalised explanations in human-robot and human-agent interaction.","PeriodicalId":134777,"journal":{"name":"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalised self-explanation by robots: The role of goals versus beliefs in robot-action explanation for children and adults\",\"authors\":\"Frank Kaptein, J. Broekens, K. Hindriks, Mark Antonius Neerincx\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A good explanation takes the user who is receiving the explanation into account. We aim to get a better understanding of user preferences and the differences between children and adults who receive explanations from a robot. We implemented a Nao-robot as a belief-desire-intention (BDI)-based agent and explained its actions using two different explanation styles. Both are based on how humans explain and justify their actions to each other. One explanation style communicates the beliefs that give context information on why the agent performed the action. The other explanation style communicates the goals that inform the user of the agent's desired state when performing the action. We conducted a user study (19 children, 19 adults) in which a Nao-robot performed actions to support type 1 diabetes mellitus management. We investigated the preference of children and adults for goalversus belief-based action explanations. From this, we learned that adults have a significantly higher tendency to prefer goal-based action explanations. This work is a necessary step in addressing the challenge of providing personalised explanations in human-robot and human-agent interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

一个好的解释会考虑到接受解释的用户。我们的目标是更好地了解用户偏好,以及接受机器人解释的儿童和成人之间的差异。我们将Nao-robot实现为基于信念-欲望-意图(BDI)的智能体,并使用两种不同的解释风格来解释其行为。两者都是基于人类如何向彼此解释和证明自己的行为。一种解释风格传达的信念给出了代理为什么执行动作的上下文信息。另一种解释风格传达目标,在执行操作时通知用户代理的期望状态。我们进行了一项用户研究(19名儿童,19名成人),在该研究中,一个nao -机器人执行支持1型糖尿病管理的动作。我们调查了儿童和成人对基于目标和基于信念的行为解释的偏好。由此,我们了解到,成年人更倾向于选择基于目标的行为解释。这项工作是解决在人机和人机交互中提供个性化解释的挑战的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalised self-explanation by robots: The role of goals versus beliefs in robot-action explanation for children and adults
A good explanation takes the user who is receiving the explanation into account. We aim to get a better understanding of user preferences and the differences between children and adults who receive explanations from a robot. We implemented a Nao-robot as a belief-desire-intention (BDI)-based agent and explained its actions using two different explanation styles. Both are based on how humans explain and justify their actions to each other. One explanation style communicates the beliefs that give context information on why the agent performed the action. The other explanation style communicates the goals that inform the user of the agent's desired state when performing the action. We conducted a user study (19 children, 19 adults) in which a Nao-robot performed actions to support type 1 diabetes mellitus management. We investigated the preference of children and adults for goalversus belief-based action explanations. From this, we learned that adults have a significantly higher tendency to prefer goal-based action explanations. This work is a necessary step in addressing the challenge of providing personalised explanations in human-robot and human-agent interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信