《2006年公司法》——革命还是演变?

John Birds
{"title":"《2006年公司法》——革命还是演变?","authors":"John Birds","doi":"10.1108/03090550710759649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The Companies Act became law in November 2006. Government spokesmen have claimed that it will simplify the running of the private companies that constitute the majority of registered companies and that it will enhance shareholder engagement in large quoted companies. Aims to question whether this is really the case.Design/methodology/approach – The article is a critical commentary.Findings – There are some good things in the Act but it can be argued that these hardly add up to a revolution, and the new Act remains full of regulatory requirements for all companies, something that will be compounded when the mass of necessary secondary legislation is introduced.Originality/value – Shows that evolution rather than revolution would seem a more apt description of this legislation.","PeriodicalId":447231,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Companies Act 2006 – revolution or evolution?\",\"authors\":\"John Birds\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/03090550710759649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The Companies Act became law in November 2006. Government spokesmen have claimed that it will simplify the running of the private companies that constitute the majority of registered companies and that it will enhance shareholder engagement in large quoted companies. Aims to question whether this is really the case.Design/methodology/approach – The article is a critical commentary.Findings – There are some good things in the Act but it can be argued that these hardly add up to a revolution, and the new Act remains full of regulatory requirements for all companies, something that will be compounded when the mass of necessary secondary legislation is introduced.Originality/value – Shows that evolution rather than revolution would seem a more apt description of this legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550710759649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550710759649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的——《公司法》于2006年11月成为法律。政府发言人表示,新规将简化占大多数注册公司的私营公司的运作,并会加强股东对大型上市公司的参与。目的是质疑这是否真的是这样。设计/方法论/方法——这篇文章是一篇批评性评论。调查结果-该法案中有一些好的方面,但可以说,这些都不足以构成一场革命,新法案仍然充满了对所有公司的监管要求,当大量必要的次级立法被引入时,这些要求将变得更加复杂。原创性/价值-表明进化而不是革命似乎更适合描述这项立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Companies Act 2006 – revolution or evolution?
Purpose – The Companies Act became law in November 2006. Government spokesmen have claimed that it will simplify the running of the private companies that constitute the majority of registered companies and that it will enhance shareholder engagement in large quoted companies. Aims to question whether this is really the case.Design/methodology/approach – The article is a critical commentary.Findings – There are some good things in the Act but it can be argued that these hardly add up to a revolution, and the new Act remains full of regulatory requirements for all companies, something that will be compounded when the mass of necessary secondary legislation is introduced.Originality/value – Shows that evolution rather than revolution would seem a more apt description of this legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信