{"title":"移民对非裔美国人收入的影响:1979- 1989年纽约市劳动力市场的就业水平分析","authors":"D. Howell, Elizabeth J. Mueller","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.104648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The improvement in the relative economic status of African-American Workers in the 1960's and 1970's was reversed in the 1980's, a decade that also featured a collapse in the relative (and real) wages of the last skilled (Bound and Freeman, 1992; Blau and Kahn, 1992; Levy and Murnane, 1992). At the same time, the U.S. experienced the largest absolute and per capita levels of immigration since the early part of the century. Significantly, this recent wave of immigrants was far less skilled, at least in terms of educational attainment, than earlier waves of immigrants in the post-war period. Friedberg and Hunt (1995) report that 43% of new immigrants did not possess the equivalent of a high school degree. And according to a recent study by david Jaeger (1995), in the 50 largest metropolitan areas employed male immigrants were about 16% of the civilian workforce with less than a high school degree in 1980; by 1990 this figure was over 30%. For women, this figure rose from 17% to almost 28%. Not surprisingly, there is a concern that growing numbers of immigrant workers have negatively affected the standing of African-American in urban labor markets. But with the exception of Borjas, Freeman and Katz (1996) and Jaeger (1995), the consensus in the research community appears to be that there has been little if any negative wage effects (see the surveys by Borjas, 1994; Friedberg and Hunt, 1995; and DeFreitas, 1996; National Academy of Sciences 1997). This is a rather surprising finding, since it requires a nearly instantaneous adjustment to labor supply shocks in local labor markets. Borjas (1994) terms this an \"unresolved puzzle.\" Indeed, it is a particularly puzzling since the sharp growth in the supply of low-skill immigrants took place during a decade in which the power of labor market institutions to shelter low-skill workers from intense wage competition was severely eroded. In our view, the failure to find earnings effects from sharply rising supplies of low-skill foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore these effects with across- metropolitan tests. Since immigrants are overwhelmingly concentrated in a small number of urban labor markets, such as Los Angeles, New York, Houston, San Francisco, and Miami, we would expect wage effects to be concentrated in these same cities.","PeriodicalId":114523,"journal":{"name":"Labor eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Immigrants on African-American Earnings: A Jobs-Level Analysis of the New York City Labor Market, 1979-89\",\"authors\":\"D. Howell, Elizabeth J. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.104648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The improvement in the relative economic status of African-American Workers in the 1960's and 1970's was reversed in the 1980's, a decade that also featured a collapse in the relative (and real) wages of the last skilled (Bound and Freeman, 1992; Blau and Kahn, 1992; Levy and Murnane, 1992). At the same time, the U.S. experienced the largest absolute and per capita levels of immigration since the early part of the century. Significantly, this recent wave of immigrants was far less skilled, at least in terms of educational attainment, than earlier waves of immigrants in the post-war period. Friedberg and Hunt (1995) report that 43% of new immigrants did not possess the equivalent of a high school degree. And according to a recent study by david Jaeger (1995), in the 50 largest metropolitan areas employed male immigrants were about 16% of the civilian workforce with less than a high school degree in 1980; by 1990 this figure was over 30%. For women, this figure rose from 17% to almost 28%. Not surprisingly, there is a concern that growing numbers of immigrant workers have negatively affected the standing of African-American in urban labor markets. But with the exception of Borjas, Freeman and Katz (1996) and Jaeger (1995), the consensus in the research community appears to be that there has been little if any negative wage effects (see the surveys by Borjas, 1994; Friedberg and Hunt, 1995; and DeFreitas, 1996; National Academy of Sciences 1997). This is a rather surprising finding, since it requires a nearly instantaneous adjustment to labor supply shocks in local labor markets. Borjas (1994) terms this an \\\"unresolved puzzle.\\\" Indeed, it is a particularly puzzling since the sharp growth in the supply of low-skill immigrants took place during a decade in which the power of labor market institutions to shelter low-skill workers from intense wage competition was severely eroded. In our view, the failure to find earnings effects from sharply rising supplies of low-skill foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore these effects with across- metropolitan tests. Since immigrants are overwhelmingly concentrated in a small number of urban labor markets, such as Los Angeles, New York, Houston, San Francisco, and Miami, we would expect wage effects to be concentrated in these same cities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.104648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.104648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
20世纪60年代和70年代非洲裔美国工人相对经济地位的改善在20世纪80年代发生了逆转,这十年也以最后熟练工人的相对(和实际)工资的崩溃为特征(Bound和Freeman, 1992;Blau和Kahn, 1992;Levy and Murnane, 1992)。与此同时,美国经历了自本世纪初以来最大的绝对移民和人均移民水平。值得注意的是,与战后早期的移民浪潮相比,最近这波移民的技术水平要低得多,至少在教育程度方面是如此。弗里德伯格和亨特(1995)报告说,43%的新移民没有相当于高中学历。根据大卫·耶格(david Jaeger, 1995)最近的一项研究,1980年,在50个最大的都市地区,男性移民约占高中以下学历的文职劳动力的16%;到1990年,这个数字超过了30%。对于女性来说,这一数字从17%上升到近28%。毫不奇怪,人们担心越来越多的移民工人对非洲裔美国人在城市劳动力市场的地位产生了负面影响。但除了Borjas、Freeman和Katz(1996)以及Jaeger(1995)之外,研究界的共识似乎是,工资的负面影响微乎其微(见Borjas的调查,1994;弗里德伯格和亨特,1995;和DeFreitas, 1996;国家科学院1997)。这是一个相当令人惊讶的发现,因为它需要对当地劳动力市场的劳动力供应冲击进行近乎即时的调整。Borjas(1994)称这是一个“未解之谜”。事实上,这是一个特别令人困惑的问题,因为低技能移民供应的急剧增长发生在劳动力市场机构保护低技能工人免受激烈工资竞争的力量严重削弱的十年里。在我们看来,在日益放松管制的劳动力市场中,未能发现低技能外国出生工人供应急剧增加对收入的影响,这可能反映了主导的研究方法,这种研究方法一直在探索日益放松管制的劳动力市场中外国出生工人的影响,这可能反映了主导的研究方法,这种研究方法一直在通过跨大都市测试来探索这些影响。由于移民绝大多数集中在少数城市劳动力市场,如洛杉矶、纽约、休斯顿、旧金山和迈阿密,我们预计工资效应将集中在这些城市。
The Effects of Immigrants on African-American Earnings: A Jobs-Level Analysis of the New York City Labor Market, 1979-89
The improvement in the relative economic status of African-American Workers in the 1960's and 1970's was reversed in the 1980's, a decade that also featured a collapse in the relative (and real) wages of the last skilled (Bound and Freeman, 1992; Blau and Kahn, 1992; Levy and Murnane, 1992). At the same time, the U.S. experienced the largest absolute and per capita levels of immigration since the early part of the century. Significantly, this recent wave of immigrants was far less skilled, at least in terms of educational attainment, than earlier waves of immigrants in the post-war period. Friedberg and Hunt (1995) report that 43% of new immigrants did not possess the equivalent of a high school degree. And according to a recent study by david Jaeger (1995), in the 50 largest metropolitan areas employed male immigrants were about 16% of the civilian workforce with less than a high school degree in 1980; by 1990 this figure was over 30%. For women, this figure rose from 17% to almost 28%. Not surprisingly, there is a concern that growing numbers of immigrant workers have negatively affected the standing of African-American in urban labor markets. But with the exception of Borjas, Freeman and Katz (1996) and Jaeger (1995), the consensus in the research community appears to be that there has been little if any negative wage effects (see the surveys by Borjas, 1994; Friedberg and Hunt, 1995; and DeFreitas, 1996; National Academy of Sciences 1997). This is a rather surprising finding, since it requires a nearly instantaneous adjustment to labor supply shocks in local labor markets. Borjas (1994) terms this an "unresolved puzzle." Indeed, it is a particularly puzzling since the sharp growth in the supply of low-skill immigrants took place during a decade in which the power of labor market institutions to shelter low-skill workers from intense wage competition was severely eroded. In our view, the failure to find earnings effects from sharply rising supplies of low-skill foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore foreign-born workers in increasingly deregulated labor markets may reflect the dominant research methodology, which has been to explore these effects with across- metropolitan tests. Since immigrants are overwhelmingly concentrated in a small number of urban labor markets, such as Los Angeles, New York, Houston, San Francisco, and Miami, we would expect wage effects to be concentrated in these same cities.