高等教育电子学习基准:方法论文献回顾

Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam, Somya Agrawal, Long-Sheng Chen, Quoc-Anh Nguyen
{"title":"高等教育电子学习基准:方法论文献回顾","authors":"Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam, Somya Agrawal, Long-Sheng Chen, Quoc-Anh Nguyen","doi":"10.1145/3481056.3481081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid advancements in technology and the Internet have encouraged the use of e-learning practices in many countries for training professionals in higher education. E-learning systems provide a link between instructional content and other learning activities offering digital tools and better services to facilitate learning. Within this context, e-learning quality assurance has become extremely vital for higher education institutions (HEIs) in terms of student retention and satisfaction. Based on twenty-two recent studies, this paper reviews, analyzes and synthesizes the existing literature with the aim to improve e-learning quality and identify the standards, criteria and benchmarks for e-learning systems and their evaluation. Results show that the studies were distinct majorly in terms of the research methods used for e-learning benchmarking and e-learning evaluation. Eight out of twenty-two studies focused on comprehensive framework and benchmarking indicators, while four studies provided theoretical and conceptual analysis. It was also found that three studies introduced the results of benchmarking e-learning case studies and studied conceptual models for evaluating e-learning and two studies presented evaluation criteria and the factors for e-learning evaluation. The authors provided a comparison of methodological approaches of these studies and also explored how benchmarking e-learning can be implemented for quality assurance in theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":172046,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Learning Benchmarking in Higher Education: Methodology Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam, Somya Agrawal, Long-Sheng Chen, Quoc-Anh Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3481056.3481081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rapid advancements in technology and the Internet have encouraged the use of e-learning practices in many countries for training professionals in higher education. E-learning systems provide a link between instructional content and other learning activities offering digital tools and better services to facilitate learning. Within this context, e-learning quality assurance has become extremely vital for higher education institutions (HEIs) in terms of student retention and satisfaction. Based on twenty-two recent studies, this paper reviews, analyzes and synthesizes the existing literature with the aim to improve e-learning quality and identify the standards, criteria and benchmarks for e-learning systems and their evaluation. Results show that the studies were distinct majorly in terms of the research methods used for e-learning benchmarking and e-learning evaluation. Eight out of twenty-two studies focused on comprehensive framework and benchmarking indicators, while four studies provided theoretical and conceptual analysis. It was also found that three studies introduced the results of benchmarking e-learning case studies and studied conceptual models for evaluating e-learning and two studies presented evaluation criteria and the factors for e-learning evaluation. The authors provided a comparison of methodological approaches of these studies and also explored how benchmarking e-learning can be implemented for quality assurance in theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术和互联网的迅速发展鼓励许多国家利用电子学习实践培训高等教育专业人员。电子学习系统提供了教学内容与其他学习活动之间的联系,提供了促进学习的数字工具和更好的服务。在这种背景下,电子学习质量保证对于高等教育机构(HEIs)来说,在学生保留率和满意度方面变得至关重要。本文以22项最新研究为基础,对现有文献进行了回顾、分析和综合,旨在提高电子学习质量,确定电子学习系统及其评估的标准、标准和基准。结果表明,研究的差异主要体现在对e-learning标杆和e-learning评价的研究方法上。22项研究中有8项侧重于综合框架和基准指标,而4项研究提供了理论和概念分析。研究还发现,有三项研究介绍了基准化电子学习案例研究的结果,并研究了评估电子学习的概念模型,有两项研究提出了评估标准和评估电子学习的因素。作者对这些研究的方法方法进行了比较,并探讨了如何在理论和实践中实施基准电子学习以保证质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-Learning Benchmarking in Higher Education: Methodology Literature Review
Rapid advancements in technology and the Internet have encouraged the use of e-learning practices in many countries for training professionals in higher education. E-learning systems provide a link between instructional content and other learning activities offering digital tools and better services to facilitate learning. Within this context, e-learning quality assurance has become extremely vital for higher education institutions (HEIs) in terms of student retention and satisfaction. Based on twenty-two recent studies, this paper reviews, analyzes and synthesizes the existing literature with the aim to improve e-learning quality and identify the standards, criteria and benchmarks for e-learning systems and their evaluation. Results show that the studies were distinct majorly in terms of the research methods used for e-learning benchmarking and e-learning evaluation. Eight out of twenty-two studies focused on comprehensive framework and benchmarking indicators, while four studies provided theoretical and conceptual analysis. It was also found that three studies introduced the results of benchmarking e-learning case studies and studied conceptual models for evaluating e-learning and two studies presented evaluation criteria and the factors for e-learning evaluation. The authors provided a comparison of methodological approaches of these studies and also explored how benchmarking e-learning can be implemented for quality assurance in theory and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信