初中生反射思维的过程,学习实用主义,解决建筑材料上的平面空间问题

Y. Pranyata, Rosita Dwi Ferdiani
{"title":"初中生反射思维的过程,学习实用主义,解决建筑材料上的平面空间问题","authors":"Y. Pranyata, Rosita Dwi Ferdiani","doi":"10.30653/003.202172.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study will reveal the nature of the Reflective Thinking Process of Junior High School Students with Pragmatic Learning Style in Solving Problems in Curved Side Space Building Materials. This research was conducted in MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The research subjects were 9th grade students of MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The number of subjects in this study amounted to 2 MTs students with pragmatic learning style. Researchers in this qualitative research, act as the main instrument. While the supporting instruments in this study were in the form of test sheets, questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The results showed that: 1) In the Reacting phase. In the reacting phase, subject 1 was not able to mention in detail what was known but was able to mention what was asked and was unable to explain in detail the relationship between what was asked and what was known. While subject 2 is able to mention in detail what is known and what is being asked, and is able to explain in detail the relationship between what is asked and what is known. 2) In the Comparing phase. In this phase, subject 1 is able to explain the answers to the problems obtained, remember the formula used to answer the questions, and be able to relate the problems asked to the problems at hand. While subject 2 is able to remember the formula needed, but unable to apply it to the problem. So there is an error in answering the question. 3) In the Contemplating phase. In this phase, both subjects were able to detect errors and truths, and were able to correct errors. But at the time of concluding, subject 1 could conclude correctly, and subject 2 could not conclude correctly, because of errors made during the comparing phase.","PeriodicalId":311833,"journal":{"name":"MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proses Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Bergaya Belajar Pragmatis Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar\",\"authors\":\"Y. Pranyata, Rosita Dwi Ferdiani\",\"doi\":\"10.30653/003.202172.195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study will reveal the nature of the Reflective Thinking Process of Junior High School Students with Pragmatic Learning Style in Solving Problems in Curved Side Space Building Materials. This research was conducted in MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The research subjects were 9th grade students of MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The number of subjects in this study amounted to 2 MTs students with pragmatic learning style. Researchers in this qualitative research, act as the main instrument. While the supporting instruments in this study were in the form of test sheets, questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The results showed that: 1) In the Reacting phase. In the reacting phase, subject 1 was not able to mention in detail what was known but was able to mention what was asked and was unable to explain in detail the relationship between what was asked and what was known. While subject 2 is able to mention in detail what is known and what is being asked, and is able to explain in detail the relationship between what is asked and what is known. 2) In the Comparing phase. In this phase, subject 1 is able to explain the answers to the problems obtained, remember the formula used to answer the questions, and be able to relate the problems asked to the problems at hand. While subject 2 is able to remember the formula needed, but unable to apply it to the problem. So there is an error in answering the question. 3) In the Contemplating phase. In this phase, both subjects were able to detect errors and truths, and were able to correct errors. But at the time of concluding, subject 1 could conclude correctly, and subject 2 could not conclude correctly, because of errors made during the comparing phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202172.195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202172.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在揭示具有语用学习风格的初中生在解决曲面边空间建筑材料问题时的反思性思维过程的本质。本研究在MTs. mittahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan进行。研究对象为MTs. mittahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan的九年级学生。本研究对象为2名具有语用学习风格的MTs学生。研究者在这种定性研究中,充当主要的工具。而本研究的辅助工具是测试单、问卷和访谈指南。结果表明:1)在反应阶段。在反应阶段,被试1不能详细地提到已知的内容,但能够提到被问的内容,并且不能详细地解释被问的内容与已知内容之间的关系。而受试者2能够详细地提到已知和被问到的内容,并且能够详细地解释被问到的内容和已知内容之间的关系。2)在比较阶段。在这个阶段,受试者1能够解释所得到的问题的答案,记住用来回答问题的公式,并能够将所问的问题与手头的问题联系起来。受试者2能够记住所需的公式,但无法将其应用到问题中。所以回答这个问题是错误的。3)考虑阶段。在这个阶段,两个实验对象都能够发现错误和真相,并且能够纠正错误。但在总结时,由于比较阶段的错误,受试者1可以正确总结,而受试者2不能正确总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proses Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Bergaya Belajar Pragmatis Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar
This study will reveal the nature of the Reflective Thinking Process of Junior High School Students with Pragmatic Learning Style in Solving Problems in Curved Side Space Building Materials. This research was conducted in MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The research subjects were 9th grade students of MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The number of subjects in this study amounted to 2 MTs students with pragmatic learning style. Researchers in this qualitative research, act as the main instrument. While the supporting instruments in this study were in the form of test sheets, questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The results showed that: 1) In the Reacting phase. In the reacting phase, subject 1 was not able to mention in detail what was known but was able to mention what was asked and was unable to explain in detail the relationship between what was asked and what was known. While subject 2 is able to mention in detail what is known and what is being asked, and is able to explain in detail the relationship between what is asked and what is known. 2) In the Comparing phase. In this phase, subject 1 is able to explain the answers to the problems obtained, remember the formula used to answer the questions, and be able to relate the problems asked to the problems at hand. While subject 2 is able to remember the formula needed, but unable to apply it to the problem. So there is an error in answering the question. 3) In the Contemplating phase. In this phase, both subjects were able to detect errors and truths, and were able to correct errors. But at the time of concluding, subject 1 could conclude correctly, and subject 2 could not conclude correctly, because of errors made during the comparing phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信