运动对物体参数的适应性研究

F. Huang, R. Gillespie, A. Kuo
{"title":"运动对物体参数的适应性研究","authors":"F. Huang, R. Gillespie, A. Kuo","doi":"10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study healthy human subjects (n=10) manually controlled a rotary handle to track a sinusoidally moving target as displayed on a computer screen. During movement, either the apparent handle inertia or tracking frequency changed to a higher or lower value. We analyzed the initial performance recovery following task perturbation using a linear fit of the velocity tracking error trends. For both types of task perturbations, we found significant increases in the intercept of the line fit (paired t-tests, two-tailed: p<.05) compared to trials with no change. We also found that adaptation rates indicated by the slope of the line fit of the tracking velocity error were larger for frequency changes than for apparent changes of the inertia for parameter increases (p=0.029, paired t-tests, one-tailed) and parameter decreases (p=0.055, paired tests, one-tailed). Our results provide evidence that humans use low impedance control that is task-specific to object parameters such as inertia. In addition, the results provide evidence that the adaptation to motion parameter changes and object parameter changes are different control processes.","PeriodicalId":131431,"journal":{"name":"9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005.","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of motor adaptation to movement versus object parameters\",\"authors\":\"F. Huang, R. Gillespie, A. Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study healthy human subjects (n=10) manually controlled a rotary handle to track a sinusoidally moving target as displayed on a computer screen. During movement, either the apparent handle inertia or tracking frequency changed to a higher or lower value. We analyzed the initial performance recovery following task perturbation using a linear fit of the velocity tracking error trends. For both types of task perturbations, we found significant increases in the intercept of the line fit (paired t-tests, two-tailed: p<.05) compared to trials with no change. We also found that adaptation rates indicated by the slope of the line fit of the tracking velocity error were larger for frequency changes than for apparent changes of the inertia for parameter increases (p=0.029, paired t-tests, one-tailed) and parameter decreases (p=0.055, paired tests, one-tailed). Our results provide evidence that humans use low impedance control that is task-specific to object parameters such as inertia. In addition, the results provide evidence that the adaptation to motion parameter changes and object parameter changes are different control processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005.\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,健康的人类受试者(n=10)手动控制旋转手柄来跟踪显示在计算机屏幕上的正弦运动目标。在运动过程中,手柄表观惯量或跟踪频率会发生较大或较小的变化。我们使用速度跟踪误差趋势的线性拟合分析了任务扰动后的初始性能恢复。对于这两种类型的任务扰动,我们发现与没有变化的试验相比,线拟合截距显著增加(配对t检验,双尾:p< 0.05)。我们还发现,跟踪速度误差的线拟合斜率表示的自适应率对频率变化的适应率大于对参数增加(p=0.029,成对t检验,单侧)和参数减少(p=0.055,成对检验,单侧)的表观惯性变化的适应率。我们的结果提供了证据,证明人类使用低阻抗控制,这是特定于任务的对象参数,如惯性。此外,研究结果还证明了对运动参数变化的适应与对目标参数变化的适应是不同的控制过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of motor adaptation to movement versus object parameters
In this study healthy human subjects (n=10) manually controlled a rotary handle to track a sinusoidally moving target as displayed on a computer screen. During movement, either the apparent handle inertia or tracking frequency changed to a higher or lower value. We analyzed the initial performance recovery following task perturbation using a linear fit of the velocity tracking error trends. For both types of task perturbations, we found significant increases in the intercept of the line fit (paired t-tests, two-tailed: p<.05) compared to trials with no change. We also found that adaptation rates indicated by the slope of the line fit of the tracking velocity error were larger for frequency changes than for apparent changes of the inertia for parameter increases (p=0.029, paired t-tests, one-tailed) and parameter decreases (p=0.055, paired tests, one-tailed). Our results provide evidence that humans use low impedance control that is task-specific to object parameters such as inertia. In addition, the results provide evidence that the adaptation to motion parameter changes and object parameter changes are different control processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信