对沙赫库鲁叛乱和回历1000年中马赫迪话语的评价

Mihriban Artan
{"title":"对沙赫库鲁叛乱和回历1000年中马赫迪话语的评价","authors":"Mihriban Artan","doi":"10.24082/2022.abked.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the history of Islam, many people who wanted to benefit from the power of the Savior concept declared themselves “Mahdi”. In addition, members of many political formations, religious-mystical groups and sects accepted the leader of the community to which they belonged as Mahdi. The existing powers, political formations/ movements and beliefs that these Mahdis saw as rivals have become a symbol of evil against them. Thereby a tremendous rivalry, representing good and evil, developed between them. In this rivalry, the goal of the leaders or belief leaders, who declared themselves Mahdi, was to eliminate the rival political formations, raise themselves to the dominant position and seize power. This situation has been occurred since the early days of Islam and this kind of cases have always had similar characteristics. Similar methods have been used in most of the rebellions organized around this idea. Shahkulu which occurred in 1511 was undoubtedly manifested by similar ways.This paper will examine the Mahdian aspect of the Shahkulu Rebellion and the methods applied by Shahkulu. The study will have some basic questions in this direction and will make some inferences about the role of the Mahdi discourse in the Shahkulu Rebellion within the scope of these questions. How was the phenomenon of Mahdi understood in 16th-century Islam? Why did the leaders of the 16th-century Islamic states (Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires) and sects use the title Mahdi? How did Shahkulu reach the rank of Mahdi? What metaphors of the Mahdi concept did Shahkulu use? How did Shahkulu utilize Shah Ismail’s charisma for his political interests? The answers to all these questions, which present the basic questions of our study, will be given in the conclusion.Within the scope of the above-mentioned questions, this paper will try to enlighten the effect of Hijri 1000 on the Mahdi concept in the 16th century, the nature that the Mahdi discourse (seen in the Shahkulu Rebellion wich was the first of the Kizilbash uprisings with the Mahdi concept, emerged in the 16th century) gave to the rebellion, and the ground prepared for the next uprisings. Besides, the paper will discuss and compare the main sources, reports, letters and researches by using a descriptive, interpretive and holistic method.","PeriodicalId":274288,"journal":{"name":"ALEVİLİK–BEKTAŞİLİK ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of The Mahdi Discourse in the Shahkulu Rebellion and Hijri 1000\",\"authors\":\"Mihriban Artan\",\"doi\":\"10.24082/2022.abked.368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Throughout the history of Islam, many people who wanted to benefit from the power of the Savior concept declared themselves “Mahdi”. In addition, members of many political formations, religious-mystical groups and sects accepted the leader of the community to which they belonged as Mahdi. The existing powers, political formations/ movements and beliefs that these Mahdis saw as rivals have become a symbol of evil against them. Thereby a tremendous rivalry, representing good and evil, developed between them. In this rivalry, the goal of the leaders or belief leaders, who declared themselves Mahdi, was to eliminate the rival political formations, raise themselves to the dominant position and seize power. This situation has been occurred since the early days of Islam and this kind of cases have always had similar characteristics. Similar methods have been used in most of the rebellions organized around this idea. Shahkulu which occurred in 1511 was undoubtedly manifested by similar ways.This paper will examine the Mahdian aspect of the Shahkulu Rebellion and the methods applied by Shahkulu. The study will have some basic questions in this direction and will make some inferences about the role of the Mahdi discourse in the Shahkulu Rebellion within the scope of these questions. How was the phenomenon of Mahdi understood in 16th-century Islam? Why did the leaders of the 16th-century Islamic states (Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires) and sects use the title Mahdi? How did Shahkulu reach the rank of Mahdi? What metaphors of the Mahdi concept did Shahkulu use? How did Shahkulu utilize Shah Ismail’s charisma for his political interests? The answers to all these questions, which present the basic questions of our study, will be given in the conclusion.Within the scope of the above-mentioned questions, this paper will try to enlighten the effect of Hijri 1000 on the Mahdi concept in the 16th century, the nature that the Mahdi discourse (seen in the Shahkulu Rebellion wich was the first of the Kizilbash uprisings with the Mahdi concept, emerged in the 16th century) gave to the rebellion, and the ground prepared for the next uprisings. Besides, the paper will discuss and compare the main sources, reports, letters and researches by using a descriptive, interpretive and holistic method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALEVİLİK–BEKTAŞİLİK ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALEVİLİK–BEKTAŞİLİK ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24082/2022.abked.368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALEVİLİK–BEKTAŞİLİK ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24082/2022.abked.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

纵观伊斯兰教的历史,许多想从救世主概念的力量中受益的人宣称自己是“马赫迪”。此外,许多政治组织、宗教神秘团体和教派的成员都接受他们所属社区的领袖马赫迪。现存的权力、政治组织/运动和信仰被这些马赫迪视为对手,已经成为对抗他们的邪恶象征。因此,一场代表善与恶的巨大竞争在他们之间展开。在这种竞争中,宣称自己是马赫迪的领袖或信仰领袖的目标是消灭敌对的政治派别,提升自己的统治地位并夺取权力。这种情况从伊斯兰教早期就开始发生,这种案件总是具有相似的特点。在围绕这一思想组织起来的大多数叛乱中,都使用了类似的方法。发生在1511年的Shahkulu无疑也有类似的表现。本文将考察沙赫库鲁叛乱的马吉德方面以及沙赫库鲁所采用的方法。本研究将在这个方向上提出一些基本问题,并在这些问题的范围内对马赫迪话语在沙赫库鲁叛乱中的作用作出一些推论。16世纪的伊斯兰教如何理解马赫迪现象?为什么16世纪的伊斯兰国家(奥斯曼帝国、萨法维帝国和莫卧儿帝国)和教派的领导人使用马赫迪这个头衔?沙赫库鲁是如何达到马赫迪的地位的?沙赫库鲁用了什么比喻马赫迪的概念?沙库鲁如何利用沙伊斯梅尔的个人魅力来谋取自己的政治利益?所有这些问题都是我们研究的基本问题,这些问题的答案将在结束语中给出。在上述问题的范围内,本文将试图揭示Hijri 1000对16世纪马赫迪概念的影响,马赫迪话语的性质(见于16世纪出现的第一次以马赫迪概念为基础的克齐尔巴什起义中的沙库鲁起义)赋予了叛乱,并为下一次起义奠定了基础。此外,本文将采用描述性,解释性和整体性的方法对主要来源,报告,信件和研究进行讨论和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of The Mahdi Discourse in the Shahkulu Rebellion and Hijri 1000
Throughout the history of Islam, many people who wanted to benefit from the power of the Savior concept declared themselves “Mahdi”. In addition, members of many political formations, religious-mystical groups and sects accepted the leader of the community to which they belonged as Mahdi. The existing powers, political formations/ movements and beliefs that these Mahdis saw as rivals have become a symbol of evil against them. Thereby a tremendous rivalry, representing good and evil, developed between them. In this rivalry, the goal of the leaders or belief leaders, who declared themselves Mahdi, was to eliminate the rival political formations, raise themselves to the dominant position and seize power. This situation has been occurred since the early days of Islam and this kind of cases have always had similar characteristics. Similar methods have been used in most of the rebellions organized around this idea. Shahkulu which occurred in 1511 was undoubtedly manifested by similar ways.This paper will examine the Mahdian aspect of the Shahkulu Rebellion and the methods applied by Shahkulu. The study will have some basic questions in this direction and will make some inferences about the role of the Mahdi discourse in the Shahkulu Rebellion within the scope of these questions. How was the phenomenon of Mahdi understood in 16th-century Islam? Why did the leaders of the 16th-century Islamic states (Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires) and sects use the title Mahdi? How did Shahkulu reach the rank of Mahdi? What metaphors of the Mahdi concept did Shahkulu use? How did Shahkulu utilize Shah Ismail’s charisma for his political interests? The answers to all these questions, which present the basic questions of our study, will be given in the conclusion.Within the scope of the above-mentioned questions, this paper will try to enlighten the effect of Hijri 1000 on the Mahdi concept in the 16th century, the nature that the Mahdi discourse (seen in the Shahkulu Rebellion wich was the first of the Kizilbash uprisings with the Mahdi concept, emerged in the 16th century) gave to the rebellion, and the ground prepared for the next uprisings. Besides, the paper will discuss and compare the main sources, reports, letters and researches by using a descriptive, interpretive and holistic method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信