日间护理手术中鞘内(1%)2-氯普鲁卡因与鞘内(0.5%)感索卡因的比较研究

Y. Anarase, A. Bhalerao
{"title":"日间护理手术中鞘内(1%)2-氯普鲁卡因与鞘内(0.5%)感索卡因的比较研究","authors":"Y. Anarase, A. Bhalerao","doi":"10.26611/101511211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Day-care surgery, it is the patient being discharged from the hospital on the same day of surgical procedure, has become immensely popular modality of treatment throughout the globe. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal (1%) 2-Chloroprocaine and intrathecal (0.5%) sensorcaine for day care infraumbilical surgeries. Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized study carried out in the patients undergoing the various infraumbilical day care surgeries under spinal anaesthesia at tertiary health care centre. After the ethical permission, the written informed consent was obtained from 70 patients and was enrolled in the study. Out of 70 patients, 35 patients were enrolled to Group A i.e. Chloroprocaine Group and 35 patient in Group B i.e. Sensorcaine Group The patients were randomly allocated in to the groups by computer generated random numbers. . The subarachonoid block was given to the patients in Group A with (1% ) 50 mg chlorprocaine and in Group B with( 0.5% ) 15 mg sensorcaine. The data was then analyzed by unpaired t-test and chi-square test by SPSS 19 version software. Results: The mean age in both the groups were comparable i.e. 34 ± 4.65 35± 3.97 (t=0.76,df=48,P>0.05) and the Male to Female ratio was also comparable i.e. 2.5 :1 and 1.67:1 (X2=0.35,df=1,p>0.05). Time for onset of Sensory block(min) was comparable in both the groups was 2.45 ± 1.03 and 2.29 ± 0.93 (P>0.05,t=0.72,df=68); Time for onset of Motor block (min) was comparable i.e. 3.1± 0.34 and 2.84 ± 1.04 (P >0.05,t=0.92,df=68); Total duration of sensory block (min) was significantly higher in group B ( 167 ±43.87) than Group A (105.62±30.56), (P<0.05,t=4.92,df=68); Total duration of motor block (min) was significantly greater in Group B(135±54.32) than Group A (95.73± 30.76), (P<0.05,t=1.02,df=68). Conclusion: It can be concluded from this study that sensorcaine was superior to chloroprocaine with respect to sensory motor blockade otherwise it was comparable in all the other characteristics of anaesthesia.","PeriodicalId":118187,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of intrathecal (1%) 2-Chloroprocaine Vs intrathecal (0.5%) Sensorcaine for day care surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Y. Anarase, A. Bhalerao\",\"doi\":\"10.26611/101511211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Day-care surgery, it is the patient being discharged from the hospital on the same day of surgical procedure, has become immensely popular modality of treatment throughout the globe. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal (1%) 2-Chloroprocaine and intrathecal (0.5%) sensorcaine for day care infraumbilical surgeries. Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized study carried out in the patients undergoing the various infraumbilical day care surgeries under spinal anaesthesia at tertiary health care centre. After the ethical permission, the written informed consent was obtained from 70 patients and was enrolled in the study. Out of 70 patients, 35 patients were enrolled to Group A i.e. Chloroprocaine Group and 35 patient in Group B i.e. Sensorcaine Group The patients were randomly allocated in to the groups by computer generated random numbers. . The subarachonoid block was given to the patients in Group A with (1% ) 50 mg chlorprocaine and in Group B with( 0.5% ) 15 mg sensorcaine. The data was then analyzed by unpaired t-test and chi-square test by SPSS 19 version software. Results: The mean age in both the groups were comparable i.e. 34 ± 4.65 35± 3.97 (t=0.76,df=48,P>0.05) and the Male to Female ratio was also comparable i.e. 2.5 :1 and 1.67:1 (X2=0.35,df=1,p>0.05). Time for onset of Sensory block(min) was comparable in both the groups was 2.45 ± 1.03 and 2.29 ± 0.93 (P>0.05,t=0.72,df=68); Time for onset of Motor block (min) was comparable i.e. 3.1± 0.34 and 2.84 ± 1.04 (P >0.05,t=0.92,df=68); Total duration of sensory block (min) was significantly higher in group B ( 167 ±43.87) than Group A (105.62±30.56), (P<0.05,t=4.92,df=68); Total duration of motor block (min) was significantly greater in Group B(135±54.32) than Group A (95.73± 30.76), (P<0.05,t=1.02,df=68). Conclusion: It can be concluded from this study that sensorcaine was superior to chloroprocaine with respect to sensory motor blockade otherwise it was comparable in all the other characteristics of anaesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26611/101511211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/101511211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日间护理手术,即患者在手术当天出院,已经成为全球范围内非常流行的治疗方式。目的和目的:比较鞘内(1%)2-氯普鲁卡因和鞘内(0.5%)感索卡因在日托脐下手术中的疗效。方法:这是一项前瞻性,随机研究,在三级卫生保健中心接受脊髓麻醉下各种脐下日托手术的患者中进行。经伦理许可后,获得70例患者的书面知情同意书,纳入研究。70例患者中,35例患者入组A组,即氯普鲁卡因组,35例患者入组B组,即感索卡因组,采用计算机生成的随机数将患者随机分为两组。A组给予(1%)氯普鲁卡因50 mg, B组给予(0.5%)感索卡因15 mg蛛网膜下腔阻滞。采用SPSS 19版软件进行非配对t检验和卡方检验。结果:两组患者的平均年龄为34±4.65 35±3.97 (t=0.76,df=48,P>0.05),男女性别比为2.5:1和1.67:1 (X2=0.35,df=1, P>0.05)。两组感觉阻滞发生时间(min)比较,分别为2.45±1.03和2.29±0.93 (P>0.05,t=0.72,df=68);运动阻滞发生时间(min)具有可比性,分别为3.1±0.34和2.84±1.04 (P >0.05,t=0.92,df=68);感觉阻滞总持续时间(min) B组(167±43.87)显著高于A组(105.62±30.56),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,t=4.92,df=68);运动阻滞总持续时间(min) B组(135±54.32)显著大于A组(95.73±30.76),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,t=1.02,df=68)。结论:从本研究可以得出,感觉卡因在感觉运动阻滞方面优于氯普鲁卡因,而在麻醉的所有其他特征方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of intrathecal (1%) 2-Chloroprocaine Vs intrathecal (0.5%) Sensorcaine for day care surgeries
Background: Day-care surgery, it is the patient being discharged from the hospital on the same day of surgical procedure, has become immensely popular modality of treatment throughout the globe. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal (1%) 2-Chloroprocaine and intrathecal (0.5%) sensorcaine for day care infraumbilical surgeries. Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized study carried out in the patients undergoing the various infraumbilical day care surgeries under spinal anaesthesia at tertiary health care centre. After the ethical permission, the written informed consent was obtained from 70 patients and was enrolled in the study. Out of 70 patients, 35 patients were enrolled to Group A i.e. Chloroprocaine Group and 35 patient in Group B i.e. Sensorcaine Group The patients were randomly allocated in to the groups by computer generated random numbers. . The subarachonoid block was given to the patients in Group A with (1% ) 50 mg chlorprocaine and in Group B with( 0.5% ) 15 mg sensorcaine. The data was then analyzed by unpaired t-test and chi-square test by SPSS 19 version software. Results: The mean age in both the groups were comparable i.e. 34 ± 4.65 35± 3.97 (t=0.76,df=48,P>0.05) and the Male to Female ratio was also comparable i.e. 2.5 :1 and 1.67:1 (X2=0.35,df=1,p>0.05). Time for onset of Sensory block(min) was comparable in both the groups was 2.45 ± 1.03 and 2.29 ± 0.93 (P>0.05,t=0.72,df=68); Time for onset of Motor block (min) was comparable i.e. 3.1± 0.34 and 2.84 ± 1.04 (P >0.05,t=0.92,df=68); Total duration of sensory block (min) was significantly higher in group B ( 167 ±43.87) than Group A (105.62±30.56), (P<0.05,t=4.92,df=68); Total duration of motor block (min) was significantly greater in Group B(135±54.32) than Group A (95.73± 30.76), (P<0.05,t=1.02,df=68). Conclusion: It can be concluded from this study that sensorcaine was superior to chloroprocaine with respect to sensory motor blockade otherwise it was comparable in all the other characteristics of anaesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信