需求工程技术的需求

Linda A. Macaulay
{"title":"需求工程技术的需求","authors":"Linda A. Macaulay","doi":"10.1109/ICRE.1996.491440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first argument presented is that if we have a clear understanding of the objectives of the requirements engineering (RE) process then we can identify what techniques we need. No single method or technique will be sufficient. The second argument is that a key objective of the RE process is to specify a system which will ultimately be successful. Three common types of failure are examined: process failure, expectation failure and interaction failure. The third argument is that if the causes of each type of failure can be described then we will be able to identify what techniques are needed to help us avoid failure. The five common causes are described: the requirements engineering process itself, human communication within requirements, knowledge development, documentation of requirements and management. A discussion of each cause is followed by a list of the RE techniques needed. The paper concludes with a 'wish list' of seventy requirements for RE techniques, and a brief discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the RE community in meeting those requirements.","PeriodicalId":152956,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements for requirements engineering techniques\",\"authors\":\"Linda A. Macaulay\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRE.1996.491440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first argument presented is that if we have a clear understanding of the objectives of the requirements engineering (RE) process then we can identify what techniques we need. No single method or technique will be sufficient. The second argument is that a key objective of the RE process is to specify a system which will ultimately be successful. Three common types of failure are examined: process failure, expectation failure and interaction failure. The third argument is that if the causes of each type of failure can be described then we will be able to identify what techniques are needed to help us avoid failure. The five common causes are described: the requirements engineering process itself, human communication within requirements, knowledge development, documentation of requirements and management. A discussion of each cause is followed by a list of the RE techniques needed. The paper concludes with a 'wish list' of seventy requirements for RE techniques, and a brief discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the RE community in meeting those requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

提出的第一个论点是,如果我们对需求工程(RE)过程的目标有一个清晰的理解,那么我们就可以确定我们需要什么技术。没有一种方法或技术是足够的。第二个论点是,RE过程的一个关键目标是指定一个最终会成功的系统。研究了三种常见的失效类型:过程失效、期望失效和交互失效。第三种观点是,如果每种失败的原因都能被描述出来,那么我们就能确定需要哪些技术来帮助我们避免失败。描述了五个常见的原因:需求工程过程本身、需求中的人类交流、知识开发、需求文档和管理。在讨论每个原因之后,列出了所需的可再生能源技术。本文最后给出了一个“愿望清单”,列出了70个可再生能源技术的需求,并简要讨论了可再生能源社区在满足这些需求方面的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requirements for requirements engineering techniques
The first argument presented is that if we have a clear understanding of the objectives of the requirements engineering (RE) process then we can identify what techniques we need. No single method or technique will be sufficient. The second argument is that a key objective of the RE process is to specify a system which will ultimately be successful. Three common types of failure are examined: process failure, expectation failure and interaction failure. The third argument is that if the causes of each type of failure can be described then we will be able to identify what techniques are needed to help us avoid failure. The five common causes are described: the requirements engineering process itself, human communication within requirements, knowledge development, documentation of requirements and management. A discussion of each cause is followed by a list of the RE techniques needed. The paper concludes with a 'wish list' of seventy requirements for RE techniques, and a brief discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the RE community in meeting those requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信