营销缅因州餐桌土豆

G. Berney, G. Grajewski, D. Hinman, M. Prater, April Taylor
{"title":"营销缅因州餐桌土豆","authors":"G. Berney, G. Grajewski, D. Hinman, M. Prater, April Taylor","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.147004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Marketing Services Division of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) was asked by USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) National Program Leader and ARS’s New England Soil and Water Research Laboratory personnel to help with existing efforts to assist Maine fresh potato farmers in their search for alternative marketing strategies, and reverse the recent decline in the profitability of their operations. ARS researchers previously had conducted an exhaustive study defining possible crop rotations for potatoes to maintain soil fertility, reduce pest infestation, and preserve crop yields. In the course of the investigation, they determined that Maine producers needed help in marketing their products and turned to AMS for expertise in marketing and distribution practices. As a result, AMS’s Marketing Services Division initiated a study to evaluate the Maine potato industry and identify changes in business planning, product aggregation and handling, grower organization, distribution practices, and marketing activities that might help Maine’s fresh potato growers. In order to more fully understand the Maine potato marketing situation, AMS and ARS staff interviewed people involved in the potato industry. In January 2007, they contacted Maine Potato Board members and staff and scheduled a meeting with the board. Also at that time, AMS and ARS staff met with the Maine Commissioner of Agriculture and the USDA State Farm Service Agency (FSA) Director who helped them understand the financial situation of Maine tablestock potato producers. Beginning in June 2007, AMS researchers arranged on-site meetings with wholesalers and market news reporters in Jessup, MD, and Boston, MA, and with several potato farm operators in northern Maine. This was followed in 2008 by interviews and conference calls with chain store buyers in Virginia and Washington, DC; Cooperative Extension educators in Maine; potato brokers; AMS Market News staff in Benton Harbor, MI, and Boston; and USDA Federal inspectors. To better learn how Maine’s fresh potato producers could best penetrate the markets for “sustainable,” “local,” and “eco-labeled” foods, they met with the management and staffs of Red Tomato, Whole Foods Market, and Appalachian Sustainable Development, retailers on the forefront of developing direct supply chains for locally grown food. To understand the different potato products marketed to consumers, AMS researchers conducted informal surveys of retail merchandising practices for Maine-origin and other potatoes at chain store outlets. AMS researchers also undertook several supplemental analyses to identify Maine’s relative competitiveness with other sources of supply in major market locations. Prices of Maine fresh potatoes were compared with those of potatoes from other production areas from AMS Market News data. The costs of rail, truck, and water transportation for Maine and other fresh potatoes to major market locations were also examined using waybill data, to understand the transportation burden faced by Maine’s fresh potato producers. The cost of energy and Maine’s position in the competitive world of electricity, fuel, and natural gas supply and rates were compared with other producing areas to highlight the challenges Maine faces. The report also examines how fresh potato growers, repackers, and marketers in other parts of the country use cooperative marketing and supply control mechanisms, category management, and branding/promotional programs to enhance marketing efficiency and performance, and how channel diversification into processed market items, such as dehydrated products, starch, and plastics can help support fresh potato growers by creating alternative outlets for grade 2 and cull potatoes.","PeriodicalId":338433,"journal":{"name":"The research reports","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marketing Maine Tablestock Potatoes\",\"authors\":\"G. Berney, G. Grajewski, D. Hinman, M. Prater, April Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.147004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Marketing Services Division of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) was asked by USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) National Program Leader and ARS’s New England Soil and Water Research Laboratory personnel to help with existing efforts to assist Maine fresh potato farmers in their search for alternative marketing strategies, and reverse the recent decline in the profitability of their operations. ARS researchers previously had conducted an exhaustive study defining possible crop rotations for potatoes to maintain soil fertility, reduce pest infestation, and preserve crop yields. In the course of the investigation, they determined that Maine producers needed help in marketing their products and turned to AMS for expertise in marketing and distribution practices. As a result, AMS’s Marketing Services Division initiated a study to evaluate the Maine potato industry and identify changes in business planning, product aggregation and handling, grower organization, distribution practices, and marketing activities that might help Maine’s fresh potato growers. In order to more fully understand the Maine potato marketing situation, AMS and ARS staff interviewed people involved in the potato industry. In January 2007, they contacted Maine Potato Board members and staff and scheduled a meeting with the board. Also at that time, AMS and ARS staff met with the Maine Commissioner of Agriculture and the USDA State Farm Service Agency (FSA) Director who helped them understand the financial situation of Maine tablestock potato producers. Beginning in June 2007, AMS researchers arranged on-site meetings with wholesalers and market news reporters in Jessup, MD, and Boston, MA, and with several potato farm operators in northern Maine. This was followed in 2008 by interviews and conference calls with chain store buyers in Virginia and Washington, DC; Cooperative Extension educators in Maine; potato brokers; AMS Market News staff in Benton Harbor, MI, and Boston; and USDA Federal inspectors. To better learn how Maine’s fresh potato producers could best penetrate the markets for “sustainable,” “local,” and “eco-labeled” foods, they met with the management and staffs of Red Tomato, Whole Foods Market, and Appalachian Sustainable Development, retailers on the forefront of developing direct supply chains for locally grown food. To understand the different potato products marketed to consumers, AMS researchers conducted informal surveys of retail merchandising practices for Maine-origin and other potatoes at chain store outlets. AMS researchers also undertook several supplemental analyses to identify Maine’s relative competitiveness with other sources of supply in major market locations. Prices of Maine fresh potatoes were compared with those of potatoes from other production areas from AMS Market News data. The costs of rail, truck, and water transportation for Maine and other fresh potatoes to major market locations were also examined using waybill data, to understand the transportation burden faced by Maine’s fresh potato producers. The cost of energy and Maine’s position in the competitive world of electricity, fuel, and natural gas supply and rates were compared with other producing areas to highlight the challenges Maine faces. The report also examines how fresh potato growers, repackers, and marketers in other parts of the country use cooperative marketing and supply control mechanisms, category management, and branding/promotional programs to enhance marketing efficiency and performance, and how channel diversification into processed market items, such as dehydrated products, starch, and plastics can help support fresh potato growers by creating alternative outlets for grade 2 and cull potatoes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The research reports\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The research reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.147004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.147004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国农业部农业营销服务处(AMS)营销服务部受美国农业部农业研究服务处(ARS)国家项目负责人和ARS新英格兰土壤和水研究实验室人员的委托,协助缅因州新鲜马铃薯农民寻找替代营销策略,并扭转其业务盈利能力最近下降的趋势。农业研究所的研究人员此前进行了一项详尽的研究,确定了马铃薯可能的轮作,以保持土壤肥力,减少害虫侵扰,并保持作物产量。在调查过程中,他们确定缅因州的生产商在营销产品方面需要帮助,并向AMS寻求营销和分销实践方面的专业知识。因此,AMS的营销服务部发起了一项研究,以评估缅因州的马铃薯产业,并确定在商业计划、产品聚集和处理、种植者组织、分销实践和营销活动方面的变化,这些变化可能有助于缅因州的新鲜马铃薯种植者。为了更全面地了解缅因州马铃薯的营销情况,AMS和ARS的工作人员采访了马铃薯行业的相关人士。2007年1月,他们联系了缅因州马铃薯委员会的成员和工作人员,并安排了一次董事会会议。同时,AMS和ARS的工作人员会见了缅因州农业专员和美国农业部国家农场服务局(FSA)局长,他们帮助他们了解缅因州食用马铃薯生产商的财务状况。从2007年6月开始,AMS研究人员安排了与马里兰州杰瑟普和马萨诸塞州波士顿的批发商和市场新闻记者以及缅因州北部的几个马铃薯农场经营者的现场会议。2008年,他又对弗吉尼亚州和华盛顿特区的连锁店买家进行了采访和电话会议;缅因州合作推广教育工作者;土豆经纪人;AMS市场新闻工作人员在本顿港,密歇根州和波士顿;和美国农业部联邦检查员。为了更好地了解缅因州的新鲜马铃薯生产商如何才能最好地打入“可持续”、“本地”和“生态标签”食品市场,他们会见了红番茄、全食市场和阿巴拉契亚可持续发展公司的管理层和员工,这些零售商都是发展本地种植食品直接供应链的前沿。为了了解销售给消费者的不同土豆产品,美国农业研究中心的研究人员对连锁商店销售缅因州原产土豆和其他土豆的零售销售做法进行了非正式调查。AMS的研究人员还进行了几项补充分析,以确定缅因州与主要市场位置的其他供应来源的相对竞争力。缅因州新鲜土豆的价格与AMS市场新闻数据中其他产区的土豆价格进行了比较。利用运单数据,研究了缅因州和其他地方的新鲜土豆到主要市场的铁路、卡车和水路运输成本,以了解缅因州新鲜土豆生产商面临的运输负担。能源成本以及缅因州在竞争激烈的电力、燃料和天然气供应和价格方面的地位与其他产区进行了比较,以突出缅因州面临的挑战。报告还研究了该国其他地区的新鲜马铃薯种植者、再包装商和营销商如何利用合作营销和供应控制机制、品类管理和品牌/促销计划来提高营销效率和业绩,以及如何通过为二级马铃薯和精加工马铃薯创造替代销售渠道,使加工市场产品(如脱水产品、淀粉和塑料)多样化,从而帮助支持新鲜马铃薯种植者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marketing Maine Tablestock Potatoes
The Marketing Services Division of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) was asked by USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) National Program Leader and ARS’s New England Soil and Water Research Laboratory personnel to help with existing efforts to assist Maine fresh potato farmers in their search for alternative marketing strategies, and reverse the recent decline in the profitability of their operations. ARS researchers previously had conducted an exhaustive study defining possible crop rotations for potatoes to maintain soil fertility, reduce pest infestation, and preserve crop yields. In the course of the investigation, they determined that Maine producers needed help in marketing their products and turned to AMS for expertise in marketing and distribution practices. As a result, AMS’s Marketing Services Division initiated a study to evaluate the Maine potato industry and identify changes in business planning, product aggregation and handling, grower organization, distribution practices, and marketing activities that might help Maine’s fresh potato growers. In order to more fully understand the Maine potato marketing situation, AMS and ARS staff interviewed people involved in the potato industry. In January 2007, they contacted Maine Potato Board members and staff and scheduled a meeting with the board. Also at that time, AMS and ARS staff met with the Maine Commissioner of Agriculture and the USDA State Farm Service Agency (FSA) Director who helped them understand the financial situation of Maine tablestock potato producers. Beginning in June 2007, AMS researchers arranged on-site meetings with wholesalers and market news reporters in Jessup, MD, and Boston, MA, and with several potato farm operators in northern Maine. This was followed in 2008 by interviews and conference calls with chain store buyers in Virginia and Washington, DC; Cooperative Extension educators in Maine; potato brokers; AMS Market News staff in Benton Harbor, MI, and Boston; and USDA Federal inspectors. To better learn how Maine’s fresh potato producers could best penetrate the markets for “sustainable,” “local,” and “eco-labeled” foods, they met with the management and staffs of Red Tomato, Whole Foods Market, and Appalachian Sustainable Development, retailers on the forefront of developing direct supply chains for locally grown food. To understand the different potato products marketed to consumers, AMS researchers conducted informal surveys of retail merchandising practices for Maine-origin and other potatoes at chain store outlets. AMS researchers also undertook several supplemental analyses to identify Maine’s relative competitiveness with other sources of supply in major market locations. Prices of Maine fresh potatoes were compared with those of potatoes from other production areas from AMS Market News data. The costs of rail, truck, and water transportation for Maine and other fresh potatoes to major market locations were also examined using waybill data, to understand the transportation burden faced by Maine’s fresh potato producers. The cost of energy and Maine’s position in the competitive world of electricity, fuel, and natural gas supply and rates were compared with other producing areas to highlight the challenges Maine faces. The report also examines how fresh potato growers, repackers, and marketers in other parts of the country use cooperative marketing and supply control mechanisms, category management, and branding/promotional programs to enhance marketing efficiency and performance, and how channel diversification into processed market items, such as dehydrated products, starch, and plastics can help support fresh potato growers by creating alternative outlets for grade 2 and cull potatoes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信