机械收获青豆的田间损失

J. Glancey, W. E. Kee, T. Wootten, M. Dukes, B. C. Postles
{"title":"机械收获青豆的田间损失","authors":"J. Glancey, W. E. Kee, T. Wootten, M. Dukes, B. C. Postles","doi":"10.1300/J068V02N01_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pod stripper combines have become the predominant method of harvesting green peas for processing in the Mid-Atlantic region. A two-year investigation consisting of seventy-one field tests was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these combines for pea harvesting in a wide range of field conditions. Trash content in the harvested product ranged from 4 to 33.7% by weight with an overall average of 15.2%. Total field loss for all tests conducted ranged from 24 to 1408 kg/ha (21 to 1239 lbs/acre) and averaged 555 kg/ha (488 lbs/acre) over the two-year test period. This corresponded to a range of loss from 0.5 to 34% of the pea yield with an average loss of 10.4%. The majority of field losses for the seven varieties and four combine models evaluated was at the head of the combine averaging 70.3% of the total field loss. The variety ‘Quantum’ exhibited significantly higher total field loss than did other varieties tested. There were no significant differences at the 5% level in total loss or head...","PeriodicalId":169819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Losses for Mechanically Harvested Green Peas\",\"authors\":\"J. Glancey, W. E. Kee, T. Wootten, M. Dukes, B. C. Postles\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J068V02N01_08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Pod stripper combines have become the predominant method of harvesting green peas for processing in the Mid-Atlantic region. A two-year investigation consisting of seventy-one field tests was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these combines for pea harvesting in a wide range of field conditions. Trash content in the harvested product ranged from 4 to 33.7% by weight with an overall average of 15.2%. Total field loss for all tests conducted ranged from 24 to 1408 kg/ha (21 to 1239 lbs/acre) and averaged 555 kg/ha (488 lbs/acre) over the two-year test period. This corresponded to a range of loss from 0.5 to 34% of the pea yield with an average loss of 10.4%. The majority of field losses for the seven varieties and four combine models evaluated was at the head of the combine averaging 70.3% of the total field loss. The variety ‘Quantum’ exhibited significantly higher total field loss than did other varieties tested. There were no significant differences at the 5% level in total loss or head...\",\"PeriodicalId\":169819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068V02N01_08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068V02N01_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要脱荚联合收割机已成为中大西洋地区收获加工用青豆的主要方法。进行了为期两年的调查,包括71项田间试验,以评估这些联合收割机在广泛的田间条件下收获豌豆的有效性。收获产品的垃圾含量按重量计从4%到33.7%不等,总体平均为15.2%。在两年的测试期间,所有测试的总田间损失范围为24至1408公斤/公顷(21至1239磅/英亩),平均为555公斤/公顷(488磅/英亩)。这相当于豌豆产量的0.5 - 34%的损失范围,平均损失10.4%。7个品种和4个联合收割机模型的田间损失主要发生在联合收割机的前端,平均占田间损失总量的70.3%。品种“量子”表现出比其他品种更高的总田间损失。在5%的水平上,总损失和水头没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field Losses for Mechanically Harvested Green Peas
ABSTRACT Pod stripper combines have become the predominant method of harvesting green peas for processing in the Mid-Atlantic region. A two-year investigation consisting of seventy-one field tests was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these combines for pea harvesting in a wide range of field conditions. Trash content in the harvested product ranged from 4 to 33.7% by weight with an overall average of 15.2%. Total field loss for all tests conducted ranged from 24 to 1408 kg/ha (21 to 1239 lbs/acre) and averaged 555 kg/ha (488 lbs/acre) over the two-year test period. This corresponded to a range of loss from 0.5 to 34% of the pea yield with an average loss of 10.4%. The majority of field losses for the seven varieties and four combine models evaluated was at the head of the combine averaging 70.3% of the total field loss. The variety ‘Quantum’ exhibited significantly higher total field loss than did other varieties tested. There were no significant differences at the 5% level in total loss or head...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信