在密封出价组合拍卖中与自己竞争

Natalia Santamaría
{"title":"在密封出价组合拍卖中与自己竞争","authors":"Natalia Santamaría","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1941814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combinatorial auctions are auctions of multiple heterogeneous objects that allow bids on subsets of the objects, giving bidders the flexibility to express if the objects in a set are more valuable together than separate. This added flexibility makes it possible for the bidders to express a variety of preferences, but also complicates the problem they need to solve to find their bidding strategies. I study the problem a bidder has to solve in first-price sealed-bid combinatorial auction of two objects. I find that bidders should avoid bidding for overlapping sets, if their bids can be greater than the best competitive bids; however, this theoretical prediction fails to hold in controlled laboratory experiments.","PeriodicalId":308717,"journal":{"name":"OPER: Single Decision Maker (Topic)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing Against Oneself in Sealed-Bid Combinatorial Auctions\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Santamaría\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1941814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Combinatorial auctions are auctions of multiple heterogeneous objects that allow bids on subsets of the objects, giving bidders the flexibility to express if the objects in a set are more valuable together than separate. This added flexibility makes it possible for the bidders to express a variety of preferences, but also complicates the problem they need to solve to find their bidding strategies. I study the problem a bidder has to solve in first-price sealed-bid combinatorial auction of two objects. I find that bidders should avoid bidding for overlapping sets, if their bids can be greater than the best competitive bids; however, this theoretical prediction fails to hold in controlled laboratory experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OPER: Single Decision Maker (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OPER: Single Decision Maker (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPER: Single Decision Maker (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

组合拍卖是对多个异构对象的拍卖,允许对这些对象的子集进行出价,从而使竞标者能够灵活地表达一组对象放在一起是否比分开更有价值。这种增加的灵活性使竞标者有可能表达各种各样的偏好,但也使他们需要解决的问题复杂化,以找到他们的投标策略。研究了两件物品的首价密封组合拍卖中竞标者必须解决的问题。我发现,如果竞标者的出价可能大于最佳竞争出价,则应避免对重叠集进行投标;然而,这种理论预测在受控的实验室实验中不成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competing Against Oneself in Sealed-Bid Combinatorial Auctions
Combinatorial auctions are auctions of multiple heterogeneous objects that allow bids on subsets of the objects, giving bidders the flexibility to express if the objects in a set are more valuable together than separate. This added flexibility makes it possible for the bidders to express a variety of preferences, but also complicates the problem they need to solve to find their bidding strategies. I study the problem a bidder has to solve in first-price sealed-bid combinatorial auction of two objects. I find that bidders should avoid bidding for overlapping sets, if their bids can be greater than the best competitive bids; however, this theoretical prediction fails to hold in controlled laboratory experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信