土耳其妇女的产前诊断偏好及其选择与气质的关系

O. B. Tulmac, V. Buturak
{"title":"土耳其妇女的产前诊断偏好及其选择与气质的关系","authors":"O. B. Tulmac, V. Buturak","doi":"10.2174/1573404817666210122151815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe purpose of this study is to explain which choices Turkish women prefer for\nprenatal diagnosis more frequently and to find out if there is any association between\ntemperament and decisions through the prenatal diagnostic steps or consistency of decision.\n\n\n\nThis is a cross-sectional study on pregnant women who admitted to\nour outpatient clinic based on the responses to a self-administered questionnaire at the time of\ncombined test or triple test as the first prenatal screening test. 198 pregnant completed selfadministered questionnaires comprising 131 questions including Temperament Evaluation of\nMemphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego questionnaire (TEMPS-A).\n\n\n\nOverall, 88.4% of women were willing to learn if there was an anomaly, whereas 4.5%\ndid not; 7.5% were uncertain. Of the included patients, 87.9% would decide on the screening\ntests to be performed, 23.2% had a positive attitude on diagnostic tests, and only 13.1% were\nin favour of termination. No association was found between the temperament scores and\npositive, negative and indecisive attitudes of the patients. In addition, there was no relation\nbetween being decisive and indecisive, and the temperament scores except for cyclothymic\nscores. Indecisive attitude to termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores (5 (1–\n13) for decisive patients, 7 (0–17 for indecisive patients, p=0.035).\n\n\n\n We found that affective temperaments measured by the TEMPS-A are not related\nwith the attitudes about prenatal screening or diagnostic tests or termination. Indecisive attitude\nto termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores.\n\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal diagnosis preferences of turkish women and the association of their choices with temperament\",\"authors\":\"O. B. Tulmac, V. Buturak\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404817666210122151815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe purpose of this study is to explain which choices Turkish women prefer for\\nprenatal diagnosis more frequently and to find out if there is any association between\\ntemperament and decisions through the prenatal diagnostic steps or consistency of decision.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis is a cross-sectional study on pregnant women who admitted to\\nour outpatient clinic based on the responses to a self-administered questionnaire at the time of\\ncombined test or triple test as the first prenatal screening test. 198 pregnant completed selfadministered questionnaires comprising 131 questions including Temperament Evaluation of\\nMemphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego questionnaire (TEMPS-A).\\n\\n\\n\\nOverall, 88.4% of women were willing to learn if there was an anomaly, whereas 4.5%\\ndid not; 7.5% were uncertain. Of the included patients, 87.9% would decide on the screening\\ntests to be performed, 23.2% had a positive attitude on diagnostic tests, and only 13.1% were\\nin favour of termination. No association was found between the temperament scores and\\npositive, negative and indecisive attitudes of the patients. In addition, there was no relation\\nbetween being decisive and indecisive, and the temperament scores except for cyclothymic\\nscores. Indecisive attitude to termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores (5 (1–\\n13) for decisive patients, 7 (0–17 for indecisive patients, p=0.035).\\n\\n\\n\\n We found that affective temperaments measured by the TEMPS-A are not related\\nwith the attitudes about prenatal screening or diagnostic tests or termination. Indecisive attitude\\nto termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210122151815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210122151815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是解释土耳其妇女更倾向于产前诊断的哪些选择,并通过产前诊断步骤或决定的一致性来发现气质和决定之间是否存在任何关联。这是一项横断面研究,基于在首次产前筛查时进行联合检查或三重检查时自我填写的问卷。198名孕妇完成了包括孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥气质评价问卷(TEMPS-A)在内的131个问题的自填问卷。总体而言,88.4%的女性愿意了解是否存在异常,而4.5%的女性不愿意;7.5%的人不确定。在纳入的患者中,87.9%的人会决定进行筛查试验,23.2%的人对诊断试验持积极态度,只有13.1%的人赞成终止妊娠。气质得分与患者的积极、消极和优柔寡断态度之间无相关性。此外,果断和优柔寡断与气质得分之间没有关系,但循环胸腺得分除外。对终止的优柔寡断态度与较高的循环胸腺评分相关(果断患者为5(1-13),优柔寡断患者为7 (0-17),p=0.035)。我们发现TEMPS-A测量的情感气质与产前筛查、诊断测试或终止妊娠的态度无关。对终止的优柔寡断态度与较高的循环胸腺评分相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prenatal diagnosis preferences of turkish women and the association of their choices with temperament
The purpose of this study is to explain which choices Turkish women prefer for prenatal diagnosis more frequently and to find out if there is any association between temperament and decisions through the prenatal diagnostic steps or consistency of decision. This is a cross-sectional study on pregnant women who admitted to our outpatient clinic based on the responses to a self-administered questionnaire at the time of combined test or triple test as the first prenatal screening test. 198 pregnant completed selfadministered questionnaires comprising 131 questions including Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego questionnaire (TEMPS-A). Overall, 88.4% of women were willing to learn if there was an anomaly, whereas 4.5% did not; 7.5% were uncertain. Of the included patients, 87.9% would decide on the screening tests to be performed, 23.2% had a positive attitude on diagnostic tests, and only 13.1% were in favour of termination. No association was found between the temperament scores and positive, negative and indecisive attitudes of the patients. In addition, there was no relation between being decisive and indecisive, and the temperament scores except for cyclothymic scores. Indecisive attitude to termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores (5 (1– 13) for decisive patients, 7 (0–17 for indecisive patients, p=0.035). We found that affective temperaments measured by the TEMPS-A are not related with the attitudes about prenatal screening or diagnostic tests or termination. Indecisive attitude to termination was associated with higher cyclothymic scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信