涡轮机械损失分析:机械功势与熵分析的关系

J. Leggett, Yaomin Zhao, E. Richardson, R. Sandberg
{"title":"涡轮机械损失分析:机械功势与熵分析的关系","authors":"J. Leggett, Yaomin Zhao, E. Richardson, R. Sandberg","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-59436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Physics-based loss analysis methods have been developed to interpret the detailed three-dimensional and time-dependent predictions of turbomachinery CFD simulations. This paper contrasts two analysis methods for assessing loss: entropy loss analysis (Zhao & Sandberg, GT2019-90126) and mechanical work potential analysis (Miller, GT2013-95488). The two individual analyses are applied to high-fidelity simulation data for linear high-pressure compressor and high-pressure turbine cascades. The results show each analysis captures the loss generating processes in different ways, corresponding to different terms in their equations. The key loss generation processes are shown to be turbulent and mean viscous dissipation in the mechanical work potential analysis, and mean viscous dissipation and turbulence production in the entropy loss analysis. A relationship between the two approaches is derived rigorously, providing a means to convert between the results of the two approaches, enabling designers to assess individual stage performance using the entropy-based analysis and multiple stages in terms of mechanical work potential, by using the same reference pressure.","PeriodicalId":369703,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turbomachinery Loss Analysis: The Relationship Between Mechanical Work Potential and Entropy Analyses\",\"authors\":\"J. Leggett, Yaomin Zhao, E. Richardson, R. Sandberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2021-59436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Physics-based loss analysis methods have been developed to interpret the detailed three-dimensional and time-dependent predictions of turbomachinery CFD simulations. This paper contrasts two analysis methods for assessing loss: entropy loss analysis (Zhao & Sandberg, GT2019-90126) and mechanical work potential analysis (Miller, GT2013-95488). The two individual analyses are applied to high-fidelity simulation data for linear high-pressure compressor and high-pressure turbine cascades. The results show each analysis captures the loss generating processes in different ways, corresponding to different terms in their equations. The key loss generation processes are shown to be turbulent and mean viscous dissipation in the mechanical work potential analysis, and mean viscous dissipation and turbulence production in the entropy loss analysis. A relationship between the two approaches is derived rigorously, providing a means to convert between the results of the two approaches, enabling designers to assess individual stage performance using the entropy-based analysis and multiple stages in terms of mechanical work potential, by using the same reference pressure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-59436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-59436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于物理的损失分析方法已经发展到解释涡轮机械CFD模拟的详细三维和时间相关预测。本文对比了两种评估损失的分析方法:熵损失分析(Zhao & Sandberg, GT2019-90126)和机械功势分析(Miller, GT2013-95488)。这两种单独的分析分别应用于高压压气机和高压涡轮叶栅的高保真仿真数据。结果表明,每种分析都以不同的方式捕获了损失产生过程,对应于其方程中的不同项。在力学功势分析中,主要的损失产生过程为湍流耗散和平均粘滞耗散,在熵损失分析中,主要的损失产生过程为平均粘滞耗散和湍流产生。两种方法之间的关系得到了严格的推导,提供了一种在两种方法的结果之间进行转换的方法,使设计人员能够使用基于熵的分析来评估单个阶段的性能,并通过使用相同的参考压力来评估多个阶段的机械功势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turbomachinery Loss Analysis: The Relationship Between Mechanical Work Potential and Entropy Analyses
Physics-based loss analysis methods have been developed to interpret the detailed three-dimensional and time-dependent predictions of turbomachinery CFD simulations. This paper contrasts two analysis methods for assessing loss: entropy loss analysis (Zhao & Sandberg, GT2019-90126) and mechanical work potential analysis (Miller, GT2013-95488). The two individual analyses are applied to high-fidelity simulation data for linear high-pressure compressor and high-pressure turbine cascades. The results show each analysis captures the loss generating processes in different ways, corresponding to different terms in their equations. The key loss generation processes are shown to be turbulent and mean viscous dissipation in the mechanical work potential analysis, and mean viscous dissipation and turbulence production in the entropy loss analysis. A relationship between the two approaches is derived rigorously, providing a means to convert between the results of the two approaches, enabling designers to assess individual stage performance using the entropy-based analysis and multiple stages in terms of mechanical work potential, by using the same reference pressure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信