社会人口特征、决策空间与医院管理能力:工作环境的因果模型

Ar-an J. Nano
{"title":"社会人口特征、决策空间与医院管理能力:工作环境的因果模型","authors":"Ar-an J. Nano","doi":"10.46409/002.kvbv7483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To develop a Causal Model that fits the working environment and assess the correlation between the working environment and socio-demographic characteristics, the level of decision space, and management capacity among training hospitals in region 10. \nMethods: This Causal-Comparative Research utilized a questionnaire from the decision space model, the Black Box Model of Public Management Capacity, and the Nursing Work Index answered by 185 randomly chosen hospital staff from two DOH hospitals in Northern Mindanao.\nResults: Results showed a wide level of Decision Space (M = 3.90), a high level of Management Capacity (M = 4.01) and Working Environment (M = 3.85). The result also showed a moderate to significant solid relationship between Decision Space (r = .44), Management Capacity (r = .83), and Working Environment; a strong relationship between and working environment. There is no relationship between Socio-Demographic profiles. Among the variables Managing for Result (b = .307), Human Resource Management (b = .258), Capital Management (b = .162), and IT Management (b = .124) predict a positive Working Environment. Lastly, among the causal models tested, a model that explains that an indirect relationship of Human Resource Management (b = .258) and IT Management (b = .405) to Working Environment through Managing for Results and a direct correlation between Human Resource Management (b = .298), Capital Management (b = .185), Managing for Results (b = .325) and Working Environment, showed meets the predetermined criteria for best fit.\" \nConclusion and Implications: The study concludes that Managing for Results or the ability to integrate results in the planning and implementation, human resource management, and capital management are essential skills that would improve the working conditions of healthcare workers.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-Demographic Profile, Decision Space, and Management Capacity of Hospitals: A Causal Model on Work Environment\",\"authors\":\"Ar-an J. Nano\",\"doi\":\"10.46409/002.kvbv7483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To develop a Causal Model that fits the working environment and assess the correlation between the working environment and socio-demographic characteristics, the level of decision space, and management capacity among training hospitals in region 10. \\nMethods: This Causal-Comparative Research utilized a questionnaire from the decision space model, the Black Box Model of Public Management Capacity, and the Nursing Work Index answered by 185 randomly chosen hospital staff from two DOH hospitals in Northern Mindanao.\\nResults: Results showed a wide level of Decision Space (M = 3.90), a high level of Management Capacity (M = 4.01) and Working Environment (M = 3.85). The result also showed a moderate to significant solid relationship between Decision Space (r = .44), Management Capacity (r = .83), and Working Environment; a strong relationship between and working environment. There is no relationship between Socio-Demographic profiles. Among the variables Managing for Result (b = .307), Human Resource Management (b = .258), Capital Management (b = .162), and IT Management (b = .124) predict a positive Working Environment. Lastly, among the causal models tested, a model that explains that an indirect relationship of Human Resource Management (b = .258) and IT Management (b = .405) to Working Environment through Managing for Results and a direct correlation between Human Resource Management (b = .298), Capital Management (b = .185), Managing for Results (b = .325) and Working Environment, showed meets the predetermined criteria for best fit.\\\" \\nConclusion and Implications: The study concludes that Managing for Results or the ability to integrate results in the planning and implementation, human resource management, and capital management are essential skills that would improve the working conditions of healthcare workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.kvbv7483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.kvbv7483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一个适合工作环境的因果模型,评估10区培训医院工作环境与社会人口特征、决策空间水平和管理能力之间的相关性。方法:采用决策空间模型、公共管理能力黑盒模型和护理工作指数问卷进行因果对比研究,随机抽取棉兰老岛北部两家卫生部医院的185名医护人员进行问卷调查。结果:决策空间(M = 3.90)、管理能力(M = 4.01)和工作环境(M = 3.85)水平较高。决策空间(r = 0.44)、管理能力(r = 0.83)与工作环境之间存在中等到显著的关系;良好的人际关系和工作环境。社会人口特征之间没有关系。在结果管理(b = .307)变量中,人力资源管理(b = .258)、资本管理(b = .162)、信息技术管理(b = .124)预测了积极的工作环境。最后,在检验的因果模型中,一个模型解释了人力资源管理(b = .258)和IT管理(b = .405)通过结果管理与工作环境的间接关系,以及人力资源管理(b = .298)、资本管理(b = .185)、结果管理(b = .325)和工作环境之间的直接关系,表明符合预定的最佳拟合标准。结论和启示:本研究得出结论,结果管理或将结果整合到计划和实施、人力资源管理和资本管理中的能力是改善卫生保健工作者工作条件的基本技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socio-Demographic Profile, Decision Space, and Management Capacity of Hospitals: A Causal Model on Work Environment
Aim: To develop a Causal Model that fits the working environment and assess the correlation between the working environment and socio-demographic characteristics, the level of decision space, and management capacity among training hospitals in region 10. Methods: This Causal-Comparative Research utilized a questionnaire from the decision space model, the Black Box Model of Public Management Capacity, and the Nursing Work Index answered by 185 randomly chosen hospital staff from two DOH hospitals in Northern Mindanao. Results: Results showed a wide level of Decision Space (M = 3.90), a high level of Management Capacity (M = 4.01) and Working Environment (M = 3.85). The result also showed a moderate to significant solid relationship between Decision Space (r = .44), Management Capacity (r = .83), and Working Environment; a strong relationship between and working environment. There is no relationship between Socio-Demographic profiles. Among the variables Managing for Result (b = .307), Human Resource Management (b = .258), Capital Management (b = .162), and IT Management (b = .124) predict a positive Working Environment. Lastly, among the causal models tested, a model that explains that an indirect relationship of Human Resource Management (b = .258) and IT Management (b = .405) to Working Environment through Managing for Results and a direct correlation between Human Resource Management (b = .298), Capital Management (b = .185), Managing for Results (b = .325) and Working Environment, showed meets the predetermined criteria for best fit." Conclusion and Implications: The study concludes that Managing for Results or the ability to integrate results in the planning and implementation, human resource management, and capital management are essential skills that would improve the working conditions of healthcare workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信