虚假的安全感:预测不确定性对飓风损失的影响

Andrew B. Martinez
{"title":"虚假的安全感:预测不确定性对飓风损失的影响","authors":"Andrew B. Martinez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3070154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can forecasts of natural disasters alter their destructiveness? Poor forecasts increase damages when individuals do not mitigate risks based on the false belief that they will be unaffected. We test this hypothesis by examining the impact of 12-hour-ahead forecasts on hurricane damages and find that larger errors in the storm's predicted landfall location lead to higher damages. The cumulative reduction in damages from forecast improvements since 1970 is about $82 billion. This exceeds the U.S. government’s spending on these forecasts and private willingness to pay for them. The benefits from forecast improvements are underestimated and individual adaptation decisions matter.","PeriodicalId":157380,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A False Sense of Security: The Impact of Forecast Uncertainty on Hurricane Damages\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B. Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3070154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can forecasts of natural disasters alter their destructiveness? Poor forecasts increase damages when individuals do not mitigate risks based on the false belief that they will be unaffected. We test this hypothesis by examining the impact of 12-hour-ahead forecasts on hurricane damages and find that larger errors in the storm's predicted landfall location lead to higher damages. The cumulative reduction in damages from forecast improvements since 1970 is about $82 billion. This exceeds the U.S. government’s spending on these forecasts and private willingness to pay for them. The benefits from forecast improvements are underestimated and individual adaptation decisions matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Anthropology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Anthropology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对自然灾害的预测能改变其破坏性吗?当人们错误地认为自己不会受到影响而不去降低风险时,糟糕的预测会增加损失。我们通过检查12小时前对飓风损失的预测影响来检验这一假设,发现风暴预测登陆位置的较大误差导致更高的损失。自1970年以来,由于预报改进而减少的损失累计约为820亿美元。这超过了美国政府在这些预测上的支出和私人支付意愿。预测改进带来的好处被低估了,个人的适应决策很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A False Sense of Security: The Impact of Forecast Uncertainty on Hurricane Damages
Can forecasts of natural disasters alter their destructiveness? Poor forecasts increase damages when individuals do not mitigate risks based on the false belief that they will be unaffected. We test this hypothesis by examining the impact of 12-hour-ahead forecasts on hurricane damages and find that larger errors in the storm's predicted landfall location lead to higher damages. The cumulative reduction in damages from forecast improvements since 1970 is about $82 billion. This exceeds the U.S. government’s spending on these forecasts and private willingness to pay for them. The benefits from forecast improvements are underestimated and individual adaptation decisions matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信