不同有机肥和无机肥对不同灌溉方式下紫花苜蓿产量的响应

Faryal Ahmed, Fahad Waris, S. Zamir, M. Sajjad, S. Nazeer, A. Khan, F. Mustafa
{"title":"不同有机肥和无机肥对不同灌溉方式下紫花苜蓿产量的响应","authors":"Faryal Ahmed, Fahad Waris, S. Zamir, M. Sajjad, S. Nazeer, A. Khan, F. Mustafa","doi":"10.36348/sjls.2023.v08i01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was laid out to determine the response of different organic and inorganic fertilizers on alfalfa yield under different types of irrigation water. First factor comprised of two treatments as chemical fertilizer (NP 58-88 kh ha-1), Organic fertilizer as poultry manure (5 tonnes ha-1) and the other factor was comprised of three treatments as tube well water, Canal water and Treated wastewater. The results indicated that fertilizer's application significantly affected the parameters. Chemical fertilizers significantly effect on plant height (50.23 cm), number of stems per m-2 (647.67) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%). Irrigation levels had a significant effect on parameters especially canal water performed better. Plant height (49.79 cm), crop growth rate (2.37g m2 day-1) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%) these parameters were observed as better for canal water. A combination of chemical fertilizer with tube well water performed better as the maximum results were seemed for parameters of the leaf to stem ratio (0.99), root length (14.58 cm), pH (8.15), nitrogen percentage (0.05%) and organic matter content (0.85). The better performance of soil for Lucerne crop was observed in chemical fertilizer than in FYM and poultry manure. The positive effect of canal water and chemical fertilizers on available moisture in the soil was estimated. All treatment means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at a 5% probability level. During the experiment period, significantly higher crop yield was obtained in canal water and chemical fertilizer. The study concluded that the canal water and chemical fertilizer boosted crop yield and growth, improved Lucerne's quality content.","PeriodicalId":219819,"journal":{"name":"Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of Different Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Alfalfa Yield Under Different Types of Irrigation Water\",\"authors\":\"Faryal Ahmed, Fahad Waris, S. Zamir, M. Sajjad, S. Nazeer, A. Khan, F. Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sjls.2023.v08i01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experiment was laid out to determine the response of different organic and inorganic fertilizers on alfalfa yield under different types of irrigation water. First factor comprised of two treatments as chemical fertilizer (NP 58-88 kh ha-1), Organic fertilizer as poultry manure (5 tonnes ha-1) and the other factor was comprised of three treatments as tube well water, Canal water and Treated wastewater. The results indicated that fertilizer's application significantly affected the parameters. Chemical fertilizers significantly effect on plant height (50.23 cm), number of stems per m-2 (647.67) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%). Irrigation levels had a significant effect on parameters especially canal water performed better. Plant height (49.79 cm), crop growth rate (2.37g m2 day-1) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%) these parameters were observed as better for canal water. A combination of chemical fertilizer with tube well water performed better as the maximum results were seemed for parameters of the leaf to stem ratio (0.99), root length (14.58 cm), pH (8.15), nitrogen percentage (0.05%) and organic matter content (0.85). The better performance of soil for Lucerne crop was observed in chemical fertilizer than in FYM and poultry manure. The positive effect of canal water and chemical fertilizers on available moisture in the soil was estimated. All treatment means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at a 5% probability level. During the experiment period, significantly higher crop yield was obtained in canal water and chemical fertilizer. The study concluded that the canal water and chemical fertilizer boosted crop yield and growth, improved Lucerne's quality content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjls.2023.v08i01.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjls.2023.v08i01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过试验研究了不同灌溉方式下不同有机肥和无机肥对紫花苜蓿产量的影响。第一个因素由两种处理组成,即化肥(NP 58-88 kh ha-1),有机肥作为家禽粪便(5吨ha-1),另一个因素由三种处理组成,即管井水,运河水和处理过的废水。结果表明,施肥对这些参数有显著影响。化肥对株高(50.23 cm)、每m-2茎数(647.67)和氮素含量(0.05%)有显著影响。灌溉水平对各参数有显著影响,尤其是渠水表现较好。渠水条件下,株高(49.79 cm)、作物生长率(2.37g m2 day-1)和氮素含量(0.05%)较好。管井水配施效果较好,叶柄比(0.99)、根长(14.58 cm)、pH(8.15)、氮含量(0.05%)和有机质含量(0.85)等指标均达到最大值。施用化肥对苜蓿作物的土壤性能优于施用化肥和禽粪。评价了渠水和化肥对土壤有效水分的积极影响。所有治疗方法在5%概率水平上采用最小显著性差异(LSD)检验进行比较。试验期内,施用运河水和化肥可显著提高作物产量。研究表明,运河水和化肥促进了作物的产量和生长,提高了卢塞恩的品质含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response of Different Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Alfalfa Yield Under Different Types of Irrigation Water
An experiment was laid out to determine the response of different organic and inorganic fertilizers on alfalfa yield under different types of irrigation water. First factor comprised of two treatments as chemical fertilizer (NP 58-88 kh ha-1), Organic fertilizer as poultry manure (5 tonnes ha-1) and the other factor was comprised of three treatments as tube well water, Canal water and Treated wastewater. The results indicated that fertilizer's application significantly affected the parameters. Chemical fertilizers significantly effect on plant height (50.23 cm), number of stems per m-2 (647.67) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%). Irrigation levels had a significant effect on parameters especially canal water performed better. Plant height (49.79 cm), crop growth rate (2.37g m2 day-1) and nitrogen percentage (0.05%) these parameters were observed as better for canal water. A combination of chemical fertilizer with tube well water performed better as the maximum results were seemed for parameters of the leaf to stem ratio (0.99), root length (14.58 cm), pH (8.15), nitrogen percentage (0.05%) and organic matter content (0.85). The better performance of soil for Lucerne crop was observed in chemical fertilizer than in FYM and poultry manure. The positive effect of canal water and chemical fertilizers on available moisture in the soil was estimated. All treatment means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at a 5% probability level. During the experiment period, significantly higher crop yield was obtained in canal water and chemical fertilizer. The study concluded that the canal water and chemical fertilizer boosted crop yield and growth, improved Lucerne's quality content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信