B20:洪都拉斯农村的癌症筛查:多器官筛查方法的最大影响

L. Kennedy, Kayla Marra, Ethan LaRochelle, M. Chamberlin, K. Lyons, S. Bejarano, G. Tsongalis
{"title":"B20:洪都拉斯农村的癌症筛查:多器官筛查方法的最大影响","authors":"L. Kennedy, Kayla Marra, Ethan LaRochelle, M. Chamberlin, K. Lyons, S. Bejarano, G. Tsongalis","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Poverty, poor health infrastructure, and rurality contribute to lack of cancer screening for most residents of Honduras (HN). We hypothesized that if community-identified barriers were mitigated, rural Hondurans would participate in cancer screening; initial low-tech screening methods would be useful in identifying high-risk individuals in a large group; and that we could operationalize an acceptable and effective multiorgan screening program. Our objective was to test multiorgan cancer-screening strategies for challenging rural environments such as our site in rural El Rosario, Honduras and develop a strategy that would be generalizable to rural sites in other low-income countries. Methods: We conducted three cancer-screening projects (2013/n=449 women, 2016/n=389 women, 2017/n=299 men) by developing relationships with rural community leaders and Honduran oncologists. Together, we launched multiorgan screening events via a brigade-style medical outreach model designed to mitigate barriers to early detection of cancers. Key strategies: 1) a screening cascade system and low-tech methods to identify high-risk individuals for further screening; 2) triage for findings requiring additional workup, rather than focusing on making a definitive cancer diagnosis; 3) inserting cancer education into the participants9 experience; and 4) multiorgan screening to maximize cancer prevention with little additional use of resources. Community-identified barriers were transportation, cost, fear, and inconvenience; we negotiated an array of minimalist and highly effective community-based strategies to mitigate the barriers. In 2013 and 2016 we screened women for cancers including cervix, breast, oropharynx, and thyroid, and in 2017 screened men for testicular, oropharynx, skin, prostate, and colon cancers. Post-study, participants with suspicious findings were connected with follow-up care at a cancer center in HN. On-site screening methods ranged from no-tech, including surveys, clinical breast exams, throat palpation for thyroid, digital rectal exam for prostate, physical exam of testes, and visual skin inspection for skin cancer; to mid-tech, including telepathology for oral cancer, fecal occult blood test for colon cancer, and PSA for prostate; and high-tech PCR screening for high-risk HPV (hrHPV). Well-trained HN medical students staffed the screening areas; their participation is intended to increase long-term screening capacity in HN. Community leaders were responsible for promoting the screening clinic by training teens who traveled to villages to introduce the opportunity. Results: Participants came via a free bus, horse, motorbike, and on foot from 31 (2013), 40 (2016), and 38 (2017) different communities. Median age and years of education were 38/5 (2013), 40/6 (2016), and 47/4 (2017). Almost every participant completed all screenings. We found 11 types of hrHPV; in 2013/8.4% and 2016/12.5% were positive for 1 or more types. Referrals for breast follow-up were 2013/2.7% and 2016/4.4%. In 2017 (men), 26 referrals were: skin screening/2; testicular exams/2; colon/2; oropharynx/0; and 20 men for clinical prostate follow-up by a screening cascade of survey, digital rectal exam, and PSA. 249 men self-identified based on ASCO colon standards and brought stool samples for FOBT/4 tested positive. We used oral consent and focus groups for post-event evaluation. Comments reflected satisfaction with the medical students, convenience of a free bus, and protection of participants9 privacy. Conclusion: With community engagement and attention to planning for organized and rapid throughput, large-scale multiorgan cancer screening is feasible in low-income rural communities. Despite low expectation of male participation because it is “common knowledge” that Honduran males avoid clinics, our experience demonstrates that with mitigation of barriers, men will participate. Citation Format: Linda Skewes Kennedy, Kayla A. Marra, Ethan Phillip Marshall LaRochelle, Mary D. Chamberlin, Kathleen D. Lyons, Suyapa A. Bejarano, Gregory J. Tsongalis. Cancer screening in rural Honduras: Maximizing impact with a multiorgan screening approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B20.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B20: Cancer screening in rural Honduras: Maximizing impact with a multiorgan screening approach\",\"authors\":\"L. Kennedy, Kayla Marra, Ethan LaRochelle, M. Chamberlin, K. Lyons, S. Bejarano, G. Tsongalis\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Poverty, poor health infrastructure, and rurality contribute to lack of cancer screening for most residents of Honduras (HN). We hypothesized that if community-identified barriers were mitigated, rural Hondurans would participate in cancer screening; initial low-tech screening methods would be useful in identifying high-risk individuals in a large group; and that we could operationalize an acceptable and effective multiorgan screening program. Our objective was to test multiorgan cancer-screening strategies for challenging rural environments such as our site in rural El Rosario, Honduras and develop a strategy that would be generalizable to rural sites in other low-income countries. Methods: We conducted three cancer-screening projects (2013/n=449 women, 2016/n=389 women, 2017/n=299 men) by developing relationships with rural community leaders and Honduran oncologists. Together, we launched multiorgan screening events via a brigade-style medical outreach model designed to mitigate barriers to early detection of cancers. Key strategies: 1) a screening cascade system and low-tech methods to identify high-risk individuals for further screening; 2) triage for findings requiring additional workup, rather than focusing on making a definitive cancer diagnosis; 3) inserting cancer education into the participants9 experience; and 4) multiorgan screening to maximize cancer prevention with little additional use of resources. Community-identified barriers were transportation, cost, fear, and inconvenience; we negotiated an array of minimalist and highly effective community-based strategies to mitigate the barriers. In 2013 and 2016 we screened women for cancers including cervix, breast, oropharynx, and thyroid, and in 2017 screened men for testicular, oropharynx, skin, prostate, and colon cancers. Post-study, participants with suspicious findings were connected with follow-up care at a cancer center in HN. On-site screening methods ranged from no-tech, including surveys, clinical breast exams, throat palpation for thyroid, digital rectal exam for prostate, physical exam of testes, and visual skin inspection for skin cancer; to mid-tech, including telepathology for oral cancer, fecal occult blood test for colon cancer, and PSA for prostate; and high-tech PCR screening for high-risk HPV (hrHPV). Well-trained HN medical students staffed the screening areas; their participation is intended to increase long-term screening capacity in HN. Community leaders were responsible for promoting the screening clinic by training teens who traveled to villages to introduce the opportunity. Results: Participants came via a free bus, horse, motorbike, and on foot from 31 (2013), 40 (2016), and 38 (2017) different communities. Median age and years of education were 38/5 (2013), 40/6 (2016), and 47/4 (2017). Almost every participant completed all screenings. We found 11 types of hrHPV; in 2013/8.4% and 2016/12.5% were positive for 1 or more types. Referrals for breast follow-up were 2013/2.7% and 2016/4.4%. In 2017 (men), 26 referrals were: skin screening/2; testicular exams/2; colon/2; oropharynx/0; and 20 men for clinical prostate follow-up by a screening cascade of survey, digital rectal exam, and PSA. 249 men self-identified based on ASCO colon standards and brought stool samples for FOBT/4 tested positive. We used oral consent and focus groups for post-event evaluation. Comments reflected satisfaction with the medical students, convenience of a free bus, and protection of participants9 privacy. Conclusion: With community engagement and attention to planning for organized and rapid throughput, large-scale multiorgan cancer screening is feasible in low-income rural communities. Despite low expectation of male participation because it is “common knowledge” that Honduran males avoid clinics, our experience demonstrates that with mitigation of barriers, men will participate. Citation Format: Linda Skewes Kennedy, Kayla A. Marra, Ethan Phillip Marshall LaRochelle, Mary D. Chamberlin, Kathleen D. Lyons, Suyapa A. Bejarano, Gregory J. Tsongalis. Cancer screening in rural Honduras: Maximizing impact with a multiorgan screening approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B20.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

贫困、卫生基础设施差和农村是洪都拉斯大多数居民缺乏癌症筛查的原因(HN)。我们假设,如果社区确定的障碍得到缓解,洪都拉斯农村居民将参与癌症筛查;最初的低技术筛查方法将有助于在一大群人中识别高风险个体;我们可以实施一个可接受且有效的多器官筛查项目。我们的目标是在具有挑战性的农村环境中测试多器官癌症筛查策略,例如我们在洪都拉斯埃尔罗萨里奥农村的站点,并制定一项可推广到其他低收入国家农村站点的策略。方法:通过与农村社区领导人和洪都拉斯肿瘤学家建立关系,我们开展了三个癌症筛查项目(2013/n=449名女性,2016/n=389名女性,2017/n=299名男性)。我们一起通过一个旅式的医疗外展模式发起了多器官筛查活动,旨在减轻早期发现癌症的障碍。关键策略:1)筛选级联系统和低技术含量的方法,以确定高危人群进行进一步筛查;2)对需要额外检查的发现进行分诊,而不是专注于做出明确的癌症诊断;3)将癌症教育融入到参与者的体验中;4)多器官筛查,在很少额外使用资源的情况下最大限度地预防癌症。社区确定的障碍是交通、成本、恐惧和不便;我们协商了一系列以社区为基础的极简和高效的战略,以减轻障碍。2013年和2016年,我们对女性进行了宫颈癌、乳腺癌、口咽癌和甲状腺癌筛查,2017年对男性进行了睾丸癌、口咽癌、皮肤癌、前列腺癌和结肠癌筛查。研究结束后,有可疑发现的参与者在HN的癌症中心接受了随访治疗。现场筛查方法从无技术,包括调查、临床乳房检查、甲状腺喉触诊、前列腺直肠指检、睾丸体检、皮肤癌目视皮肤检查;到中端技术,包括口腔癌的病理学检查、结肠癌的粪便潜血检查和前列腺PSA检查;高科技PCR筛查高危HPV (hrHPV)。训练有素的医学院学生在筛查区工作;他们的参与旨在提高HN的长期筛查能力。社区领导人负责通过培训青少年到村庄介绍这个机会来推广筛查诊所。结果:参与者从31个(2013年)、40个(2016年)和38个(2017年)不同的社区乘坐免费巴士、骑马、摩托车和步行来到这里。中位年龄和受教育年限分别为38/5(2013年)、40/6(2016年)和47/4(2017年)。几乎每个参与者都完成了所有的筛选。我们发现了11种hrHPV;2013/8.4%和2016/12.5%为1种或1种以上阳性。转诊乳腺随访分别为2013/2.7%和2016/4.4%。2017年(男性)26例转诊为:皮肤筛查/2例;睾丸考试/ 2;结肠/ 2;口咽/ 0;20名男性通过调查、直肠指检和PSA筛查级联进行临床前列腺随访。249名男性根据ASCO结肠标准自我鉴定,并带来粪便样本,FOBT/4检测呈阳性。我们采用口头同意和焦点小组进行事后评估。评论反映了对医学生的满意、免费巴士的便利以及对参与者隐私的保护。结论:在社区参与和重视规划有组织和快速的通量下,大规模的多器官癌症筛查在低收入农村社区是可行的。尽管对男性参与的期望很低,因为洪都拉斯男性不去诊所是“常识”,但我们的经验表明,随着障碍的减少,男性将会参与进来。引文格式:Linda Skewes Kennedy, Kayla A. Marra, Ethan Phillip Marshall LaRochelle, Mary D. Chamberlin, Kathleen D. Lyons, Suyapa A. Bejarano, Gregory J. Tsongalis。洪都拉斯农村的癌症筛查:多器官筛查方法的最大影响[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr B20。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract B20: Cancer screening in rural Honduras: Maximizing impact with a multiorgan screening approach
Introduction: Poverty, poor health infrastructure, and rurality contribute to lack of cancer screening for most residents of Honduras (HN). We hypothesized that if community-identified barriers were mitigated, rural Hondurans would participate in cancer screening; initial low-tech screening methods would be useful in identifying high-risk individuals in a large group; and that we could operationalize an acceptable and effective multiorgan screening program. Our objective was to test multiorgan cancer-screening strategies for challenging rural environments such as our site in rural El Rosario, Honduras and develop a strategy that would be generalizable to rural sites in other low-income countries. Methods: We conducted three cancer-screening projects (2013/n=449 women, 2016/n=389 women, 2017/n=299 men) by developing relationships with rural community leaders and Honduran oncologists. Together, we launched multiorgan screening events via a brigade-style medical outreach model designed to mitigate barriers to early detection of cancers. Key strategies: 1) a screening cascade system and low-tech methods to identify high-risk individuals for further screening; 2) triage for findings requiring additional workup, rather than focusing on making a definitive cancer diagnosis; 3) inserting cancer education into the participants9 experience; and 4) multiorgan screening to maximize cancer prevention with little additional use of resources. Community-identified barriers were transportation, cost, fear, and inconvenience; we negotiated an array of minimalist and highly effective community-based strategies to mitigate the barriers. In 2013 and 2016 we screened women for cancers including cervix, breast, oropharynx, and thyroid, and in 2017 screened men for testicular, oropharynx, skin, prostate, and colon cancers. Post-study, participants with suspicious findings were connected with follow-up care at a cancer center in HN. On-site screening methods ranged from no-tech, including surveys, clinical breast exams, throat palpation for thyroid, digital rectal exam for prostate, physical exam of testes, and visual skin inspection for skin cancer; to mid-tech, including telepathology for oral cancer, fecal occult blood test for colon cancer, and PSA for prostate; and high-tech PCR screening for high-risk HPV (hrHPV). Well-trained HN medical students staffed the screening areas; their participation is intended to increase long-term screening capacity in HN. Community leaders were responsible for promoting the screening clinic by training teens who traveled to villages to introduce the opportunity. Results: Participants came via a free bus, horse, motorbike, and on foot from 31 (2013), 40 (2016), and 38 (2017) different communities. Median age and years of education were 38/5 (2013), 40/6 (2016), and 47/4 (2017). Almost every participant completed all screenings. We found 11 types of hrHPV; in 2013/8.4% and 2016/12.5% were positive for 1 or more types. Referrals for breast follow-up were 2013/2.7% and 2016/4.4%. In 2017 (men), 26 referrals were: skin screening/2; testicular exams/2; colon/2; oropharynx/0; and 20 men for clinical prostate follow-up by a screening cascade of survey, digital rectal exam, and PSA. 249 men self-identified based on ASCO colon standards and brought stool samples for FOBT/4 tested positive. We used oral consent and focus groups for post-event evaluation. Comments reflected satisfaction with the medical students, convenience of a free bus, and protection of participants9 privacy. Conclusion: With community engagement and attention to planning for organized and rapid throughput, large-scale multiorgan cancer screening is feasible in low-income rural communities. Despite low expectation of male participation because it is “common knowledge” that Honduran males avoid clinics, our experience demonstrates that with mitigation of barriers, men will participate. Citation Format: Linda Skewes Kennedy, Kayla A. Marra, Ethan Phillip Marshall LaRochelle, Mary D. Chamberlin, Kathleen D. Lyons, Suyapa A. Bejarano, Gregory J. Tsongalis. Cancer screening in rural Honduras: Maximizing impact with a multiorgan screening approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B20.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信