特定领域论坛线程的自动汇总:收集参考数据

S. Verberne, Antal van den Bosch, S. Wubben, E. Krahmer
{"title":"特定领域论坛线程的自动汇总:收集参考数据","authors":"S. Verberne, Antal van den Bosch, S. Wubben, E. Krahmer","doi":"10.1145/3020165.3022127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We create and analyze two sets of reference summaries for discussion threads on a patient support forum: expert summaries and crowdsourced, non-expert summaries. Ideally, reference summaries for discussion forum threads are created by expert members of the forum community. When there are few or no expert members available, crowdsourcing the reference summaries is an alternative. In this paper we investigate whether domain-specific forum data requires the hiring of domain experts for creating reference summaries. We analyze the inter-rater agreement for both data-sets and we train summarization models using the two types of reference summaries. The inter-rater agreement in crowdsourced reference summaries is low, close to random, while domain experts achieve a considerably higher, fair, agreement. The trained models however are similar to each other. We conclude that it is possible to train an extractive summarization model on crowdsourced data that is similar to an expert model, even if the inter-rater agreement for the crowdsourced data is low.","PeriodicalId":398762,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Summarization of Domain-specific Forum Threads: Collecting Reference Data\",\"authors\":\"S. Verberne, Antal van den Bosch, S. Wubben, E. Krahmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3020165.3022127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We create and analyze two sets of reference summaries for discussion threads on a patient support forum: expert summaries and crowdsourced, non-expert summaries. Ideally, reference summaries for discussion forum threads are created by expert members of the forum community. When there are few or no expert members available, crowdsourcing the reference summaries is an alternative. In this paper we investigate whether domain-specific forum data requires the hiring of domain experts for creating reference summaries. We analyze the inter-rater agreement for both data-sets and we train summarization models using the two types of reference summaries. The inter-rater agreement in crowdsourced reference summaries is low, close to random, while domain experts achieve a considerably higher, fair, agreement. The trained models however are similar to each other. We conclude that it is possible to train an extractive summarization model on crowdsourced data that is similar to an expert model, even if the inter-rater agreement for the crowdsourced data is low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们为患者支持论坛的讨论线程创建并分析了两组参考摘要:专家摘要和众包的非专家摘要。理想情况下,讨论论坛线程的参考摘要由论坛社区的专家成员创建。当专家成员很少或没有可用时,众包参考摘要是另一种选择。在本文中,我们研究了特定领域的论坛数据是否需要聘请领域专家来创建参考摘要。我们分析了两种数据集之间的一致性,并使用两种类型的参考摘要来训练摘要模型。在众包参考摘要中,评价者之间的一致性很低,接近随机,而领域专家则达到了相当高的、公平的一致性。然而,经过训练的模型彼此相似。我们得出的结论是,即使众包数据的评分一致性很低,也有可能在众包数据上训练一个类似于专家模型的提取摘要模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic Summarization of Domain-specific Forum Threads: Collecting Reference Data
We create and analyze two sets of reference summaries for discussion threads on a patient support forum: expert summaries and crowdsourced, non-expert summaries. Ideally, reference summaries for discussion forum threads are created by expert members of the forum community. When there are few or no expert members available, crowdsourcing the reference summaries is an alternative. In this paper we investigate whether domain-specific forum data requires the hiring of domain experts for creating reference summaries. We analyze the inter-rater agreement for both data-sets and we train summarization models using the two types of reference summaries. The inter-rater agreement in crowdsourced reference summaries is low, close to random, while domain experts achieve a considerably higher, fair, agreement. The trained models however are similar to each other. We conclude that it is possible to train an extractive summarization model on crowdsourced data that is similar to an expert model, even if the inter-rater agreement for the crowdsourced data is low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信