银团贷款的机构投资

Debarshi K. Nandy, Pei Shao
{"title":"银团贷款的机构投资","authors":"Debarshi K. Nandy, Pei Shao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.966276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent development in the syndicated loan market has been the arrival of institutional investors, including hedge funds and private equity funds as lenders. This paper asks several related questions regarding institutional participation in the syndicated loan market, and presents the first empirical analysis in the literature. We show that institutional investors who participate in the syndicated loan market act as lenders of last resort. We find that institutional investors primarily lend to riskier borrowers, for riskier purposes such as takeovers and recapitalizations, as opposed to commercial banks. Our results show that institutional loans have higher loan spreads than bank loans in the primary market, ceteris paribus. The higher riskiness of institutional loans however, does not fully explain this additional spread. Following information based theories we argue that this higher spread on institutional loans primarily serves as compensation to these investors for engaging in costly information production about borrowers, since institutions are uninformed investors in the syndicated loan market. We also show that borrowers are willing to pay the higher spread to institutional lenders as they are lenders of the last resort for these firms. Finally, consistent with the information production argument, our results show that the secondary loan market is primarily driven by trading on institutional loans; while on average only 6% of bank loans are traded, 30% to 35% of institutional loans are traded in the secondary market.","PeriodicalId":132549,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings (Archive)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Investment in Syndicated Loans\",\"authors\":\"Debarshi K. Nandy, Pei Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.966276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent development in the syndicated loan market has been the arrival of institutional investors, including hedge funds and private equity funds as lenders. This paper asks several related questions regarding institutional participation in the syndicated loan market, and presents the first empirical analysis in the literature. We show that institutional investors who participate in the syndicated loan market act as lenders of last resort. We find that institutional investors primarily lend to riskier borrowers, for riskier purposes such as takeovers and recapitalizations, as opposed to commercial banks. Our results show that institutional loans have higher loan spreads than bank loans in the primary market, ceteris paribus. The higher riskiness of institutional loans however, does not fully explain this additional spread. Following information based theories we argue that this higher spread on institutional loans primarily serves as compensation to these investors for engaging in costly information production about borrowers, since institutions are uninformed investors in the syndicated loan market. We also show that borrowers are willing to pay the higher spread to institutional lenders as they are lenders of the last resort for these firms. Finally, consistent with the information production argument, our results show that the secondary loan market is primarily driven by trading on institutional loans; while on average only 6% of bank loans are traded, 30% to 35% of institutional loans are traded in the secondary market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.966276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.966276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

银团贷款市场最近的一个发展是机构投资者的到来,其中包括对冲基金和私人股本基金。本文提出了机构参与银团贷款市场的几个相关问题,并在文献中首次进行了实证分析。研究表明,参与银团贷款市场的机构投资者扮演了最后贷款人的角色。我们发现,与商业银行不同,机构投资者主要贷款给风险较高的借款人,用于收购和资本重组等风险较高的目的。我们的研究结果表明,在同等条件下,机构贷款在一级市场上的贷款利差高于银行贷款。然而,机构贷款的高风险并不能完全解释这一额外利差。根据基于信息的理论,我们认为机构贷款的较高利差主要是对这些投资者进行补偿,因为这些投资者参与了有关借款人的昂贵信息生产,因为机构是银团贷款市场上不知情的投资者。我们还表明,借款人愿意向机构放款人支付更高的利差,因为机构放款人是这些公司的最后贷款人。最后,与信息生产理论一致,我们的研究结果表明,二级贷款市场主要由机构贷款交易驱动;平均只有6%的银行贷款在二级市场进行交易,而30%至35%的机构贷款在二级市场进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional Investment in Syndicated Loans
A recent development in the syndicated loan market has been the arrival of institutional investors, including hedge funds and private equity funds as lenders. This paper asks several related questions regarding institutional participation in the syndicated loan market, and presents the first empirical analysis in the literature. We show that institutional investors who participate in the syndicated loan market act as lenders of last resort. We find that institutional investors primarily lend to riskier borrowers, for riskier purposes such as takeovers and recapitalizations, as opposed to commercial banks. Our results show that institutional loans have higher loan spreads than bank loans in the primary market, ceteris paribus. The higher riskiness of institutional loans however, does not fully explain this additional spread. Following information based theories we argue that this higher spread on institutional loans primarily serves as compensation to these investors for engaging in costly information production about borrowers, since institutions are uninformed investors in the syndicated loan market. We also show that borrowers are willing to pay the higher spread to institutional lenders as they are lenders of the last resort for these firms. Finally, consistent with the information production argument, our results show that the secondary loan market is primarily driven by trading on institutional loans; while on average only 6% of bank loans are traded, 30% to 35% of institutional loans are traded in the secondary market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信